治疗性家庭护理计划:加拿大安大略省为期10年的治疗寄养社区实施

Q2 Social Sciences Developmental Child Welfare Pub Date : 2019-01-10 DOI:10.1177/2516103218815701
D. Browne, Jacqueline Johnson, E. Beatty, M. Cameron, D. Durham, A. Shlonsky
{"title":"治疗性家庭护理计划:加拿大安大略省为期10年的治疗寄养社区实施","authors":"D. Browne, Jacqueline Johnson, E. Beatty, M. Cameron, D. Durham, A. Shlonsky","doi":"10.1177/2516103218815701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study describes a community implementation of treatment foster care (TFC) for children and youth involved with child welfare in Ontario, Canada. There were two guiding research questions: (1) how are children and adolescents changing over the course of services and (2) how have the placements of children and adolescents changed over time? Clinical outcomes were tracked using the Assessment Checklist for Children (ACC) and Assessment Checklist for Adolescents (ACAs)—clinical tools that were specially designed to assess the functioning of young people in care. There were 1,068 ACCs on 518 children, and 559 ACAs on 222 adolescents. Each additional year of involvement with Therapeutic Family Care Program corresponded to additional improvement for both children, d = −.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) = −.25 to −.12, and adolescents, d = −.11; 95%CI = −.18 to −.03. Moderators and subdomains of clinical improvement were considered, though findings generally revealed significant improvement over time for most youngsters in most clinical areas. At the program level, there has been a significant increase in placement permanence across the last decade (i.e., greater prevalence of birth parent, adoption, and kinship care). In sum, this study illustrates an example of community implementation for TFC in a child welfare setting, which necessarily includes the systematic tracking of outcomes in the context of evidence-supported intervention.","PeriodicalId":36239,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Child Welfare","volume":"95 1","pages":"22 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2516103218815701","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Therapeutic Family Care Program: A 10-year community implementation of Treatment Foster Care in Ontario, Canada\",\"authors\":\"D. Browne, Jacqueline Johnson, E. Beatty, M. Cameron, D. Durham, A. Shlonsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2516103218815701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study describes a community implementation of treatment foster care (TFC) for children and youth involved with child welfare in Ontario, Canada. There were two guiding research questions: (1) how are children and adolescents changing over the course of services and (2) how have the placements of children and adolescents changed over time? Clinical outcomes were tracked using the Assessment Checklist for Children (ACC) and Assessment Checklist for Adolescents (ACAs)—clinical tools that were specially designed to assess the functioning of young people in care. There were 1,068 ACCs on 518 children, and 559 ACAs on 222 adolescents. Each additional year of involvement with Therapeutic Family Care Program corresponded to additional improvement for both children, d = −.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) = −.25 to −.12, and adolescents, d = −.11; 95%CI = −.18 to −.03. Moderators and subdomains of clinical improvement were considered, though findings generally revealed significant improvement over time for most youngsters in most clinical areas. At the program level, there has been a significant increase in placement permanence across the last decade (i.e., greater prevalence of birth parent, adoption, and kinship care). In sum, this study illustrates an example of community implementation for TFC in a child welfare setting, which necessarily includes the systematic tracking of outcomes in the context of evidence-supported intervention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Child Welfare\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"22 - 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2516103218815701\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Child Welfare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2516103218815701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Child Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2516103218815701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究描述了加拿大安大略省参与儿童福利的儿童和青少年治疗寄养(TFC)的社区实施情况。有两个指导性的研究问题:(1)儿童和青少年在服务过程中是如何变化的;(2)儿童和青少年的安置是如何随时间变化的?临床结果使用儿童评估清单(ACC)和青少年评估清单(ACAs)进行跟踪,这些临床工具专门用于评估青少年在护理中的功能。对518名儿童进行了1068次acca,对222名青少年进行了559次acca。治疗性家庭护理计划每增加一年,两个孩子的改善程度就会增加,d = - 0.18;95%置信区间(CI) =−。25 ~−。12岁,青少年d = - 0.11;95%ci =−。18至−.03。虽然研究结果普遍显示,随着时间的推移,大多数年轻人在大多数临床领域都有显著的改善,但我们考虑了临床改善的调节因子和子领域。在项目层面,在过去的十年中,安置的持久性有了显著的增加(即,亲生父母、收养和亲属照顾的更普遍)。总而言之,本研究说明了在儿童福利环境中社区实施TFC的一个例子,其中必然包括在证据支持的干预背景下对结果的系统跟踪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Therapeutic Family Care Program: A 10-year community implementation of Treatment Foster Care in Ontario, Canada
The present study describes a community implementation of treatment foster care (TFC) for children and youth involved with child welfare in Ontario, Canada. There were two guiding research questions: (1) how are children and adolescents changing over the course of services and (2) how have the placements of children and adolescents changed over time? Clinical outcomes were tracked using the Assessment Checklist for Children (ACC) and Assessment Checklist for Adolescents (ACAs)—clinical tools that were specially designed to assess the functioning of young people in care. There were 1,068 ACCs on 518 children, and 559 ACAs on 222 adolescents. Each additional year of involvement with Therapeutic Family Care Program corresponded to additional improvement for both children, d = −.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) = −.25 to −.12, and adolescents, d = −.11; 95%CI = −.18 to −.03. Moderators and subdomains of clinical improvement were considered, though findings generally revealed significant improvement over time for most youngsters in most clinical areas. At the program level, there has been a significant increase in placement permanence across the last decade (i.e., greater prevalence of birth parent, adoption, and kinship care). In sum, this study illustrates an example of community implementation for TFC in a child welfare setting, which necessarily includes the systematic tracking of outcomes in the context of evidence-supported intervention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Developmental Child Welfare
Developmental Child Welfare Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 measures on the lives of unaccompanied refugee minors Preparedness for adulthood among young adults with histories of out-of-home care Evaluating the impact of attachment and trauma training for children’s social care teams Evaluating the impact of attachment and trauma training for children’s social care teams Cumulative risk exposure is associated with increased risk for PTSD but not depression or anxiety. Results from a UK clinical sample of children and adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1