家庭系统差异量表(DoFSI):一种新的定性家庭干预和评估工具的开发和内容验证

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy Pub Date : 2023-05-18 DOI:10.1002/anzf.1532
Mary Jane Wilt
{"title":"家庭系统差异量表(DoFSI):一种新的定性家庭干预和评估工具的开发和内容验证","authors":"Mary Jane Wilt","doi":"10.1002/anzf.1532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ever since family systems therapy became a field of study in the mid-20th century, family functioning has defied numeric data, making families about as easy to measure as the quantum world, with all their complexity and variability – and messiness. Over the years, numerous quantitative measures have attempted to master this feat, with varying success. However, quantitative, postpositivist measures do not collect rich, meaningful data about the lived experiences of real people in unique family situations. The qualitative instrument developed and validated in this study, however, utilised participant data for its final version to increase its relevance and practicality. By soliciting the input of participants in the process of psychosocial research and intervention development, this applied study aims to improve both adherence to and effectiveness of the treatment tool, bridging the gap between research and real life. This descriptive phenomenological qualitative study gathered data from nine participants on the feasibility, acceptability, usability and relevance of a new family systems intervention tool, the Differentiation of Family System Inventory (DoFSI), founded on Bowen Family Systems theory (BFST) and Papero's five-dimensional BFST-derived framework which follows the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) established by the National Institute of Mental Health in 2009. According to the preponderance of the data, the DoFSI is user-friendly, practical, relevant, and useful as a tool for ongoing reflection and growth and is appropriate for both personal and professional use. The data affirmed the practicality, content validity and usable format of the inventory, while implicating and prompting a return to Bowen's seminal work, <i>Family Therapy in Clinical Practice</i>, to ensure the content validity of the final version of the instrument, a derivative of the study data.</p>","PeriodicalId":51763,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/anzf.1532","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiation of Family System Inventory (DoFSI): Development and content validation of a new qualitative family intervention and evaluation tool\",\"authors\":\"Mary Jane Wilt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/anzf.1532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Ever since family systems therapy became a field of study in the mid-20th century, family functioning has defied numeric data, making families about as easy to measure as the quantum world, with all their complexity and variability – and messiness. Over the years, numerous quantitative measures have attempted to master this feat, with varying success. However, quantitative, postpositivist measures do not collect rich, meaningful data about the lived experiences of real people in unique family situations. The qualitative instrument developed and validated in this study, however, utilised participant data for its final version to increase its relevance and practicality. By soliciting the input of participants in the process of psychosocial research and intervention development, this applied study aims to improve both adherence to and effectiveness of the treatment tool, bridging the gap between research and real life. This descriptive phenomenological qualitative study gathered data from nine participants on the feasibility, acceptability, usability and relevance of a new family systems intervention tool, the Differentiation of Family System Inventory (DoFSI), founded on Bowen Family Systems theory (BFST) and Papero's five-dimensional BFST-derived framework which follows the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) established by the National Institute of Mental Health in 2009. According to the preponderance of the data, the DoFSI is user-friendly, practical, relevant, and useful as a tool for ongoing reflection and growth and is appropriate for both personal and professional use. The data affirmed the practicality, content validity and usable format of the inventory, while implicating and prompting a return to Bowen's seminal work, <i>Family Therapy in Clinical Practice</i>, to ensure the content validity of the final version of the instrument, a derivative of the study data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/anzf.1532\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anzf.1532\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anzf.1532","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自从家庭系统疗法在20世纪中期成为一个研究领域以来,家庭功能就一直无视数字数据,使家庭变得像量子世界一样容易测量,尽管它充满了复杂性、可变性和混乱。多年来,许多量化措施试图掌握这一壮举,取得了不同程度的成功。然而,定量的、后实证主义的措施并没有收集到丰富的、有意义的数据,这些数据是关于真实的人在独特的家庭情况下的生活经历。然而,在本研究中开发和验证的定性工具在其最终版本中使用了参与者数据,以增加其相关性和实用性。通过征求参与者在社会心理研究和干预发展过程中的意见,本应用研究旨在提高治疗工具的依从性和有效性,弥合研究与现实生活之间的差距。这项描述性现象学定性研究收集了来自九名参与者的关于新的家庭系统干预工具的可行性、可接受性、可用性和相关性的数据,家庭系统量表的区分(DoFSI)建立在Bowen家庭系统理论(BFST)和Papero的五维BFST衍生框架之上,该框架遵循国家心理健康研究所于2009年建立的研究领域标准(RDoC)。根据数据的优势,DoFSI是用户友好的、实用的、相关的和有用的,是一个持续反思和成长的工具,适合个人和专业使用。这些数据肯定了该量表的实用性、内容效度和可用格式,同时暗示并促使我们回归Bowen的开创性工作《临床实践中的家庭治疗》,以确保该量表最终版本(研究数据的衍生品)的内容效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differentiation of Family System Inventory (DoFSI): Development and content validation of a new qualitative family intervention and evaluation tool

Ever since family systems therapy became a field of study in the mid-20th century, family functioning has defied numeric data, making families about as easy to measure as the quantum world, with all their complexity and variability – and messiness. Over the years, numerous quantitative measures have attempted to master this feat, with varying success. However, quantitative, postpositivist measures do not collect rich, meaningful data about the lived experiences of real people in unique family situations. The qualitative instrument developed and validated in this study, however, utilised participant data for its final version to increase its relevance and practicality. By soliciting the input of participants in the process of psychosocial research and intervention development, this applied study aims to improve both adherence to and effectiveness of the treatment tool, bridging the gap between research and real life. This descriptive phenomenological qualitative study gathered data from nine participants on the feasibility, acceptability, usability and relevance of a new family systems intervention tool, the Differentiation of Family System Inventory (DoFSI), founded on Bowen Family Systems theory (BFST) and Papero's five-dimensional BFST-derived framework which follows the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) established by the National Institute of Mental Health in 2009. According to the preponderance of the data, the DoFSI is user-friendly, practical, relevant, and useful as a tool for ongoing reflection and growth and is appropriate for both personal and professional use. The data affirmed the practicality, content validity and usable format of the inventory, while implicating and prompting a return to Bowen's seminal work, Family Therapy in Clinical Practice, to ensure the content validity of the final version of the instrument, a derivative of the study data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The ANZJFT is reputed to be the most-stolen professional journal in Australia! It is read by clinicians as well as by academics, and each issue includes substantial papers reflecting original perspectives on theory and practice. A lively magazine section keeps its finger on the pulse of family therapy in Australia and New Zealand via local correspondents, and four Foreign Correspondents report on developments in the US and Europe.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Adult relationship ruptures, positive psychology, cultural sensitivity, disability culture, child–parent relationship therapy and interviewing Monica McGoldrick Genograms, culture, love and sisterhood: A conversation with Monica McGoldrick Envisaging a thriving future: The integration of positive psychology into brief psychotherapy and family therapy practice Working with adult families of origin: On the nature of rupture and repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1