碳捕获和地质储存的风险管理:来自结构化专家启发的见解

Patricia Larkin, R. Gracie, A. Shafiei, M. Dusseault, M. Sarkarfarshi, W. Aspinall, D. Krewski
{"title":"碳捕获和地质储存的风险管理:来自结构化专家启发的见解","authors":"Patricia Larkin, R. Gracie, A. Shafiei, M. Dusseault, M. Sarkarfarshi, W. Aspinall, D. Krewski","doi":"10.1504/ijram.2019.103334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With a focus on risk management (RM) in injection and storage for carbon capture and geological sequestration (CCS), an expert elicitation of scientific judgements quantified collective uncertainty ranges for a number of difficult environmental and human health risk challenges. Results suggest similarities and differences in opinions, an outcome that may be reflective of both the newness and the complexity of this technology. A suitable monitoring period was estimated at about a century; however, uncertainty was three orders of magnitude, with an upper (5th percentile) value of almost 1,000 years. For selected low probability high impact georisks, only site selection and monitoring were considered 'very' effective RM options. Monitoring, well integrity studies, emergency response plan, automatic emergency shut down system and training were considered 'very' or 'extremely' effective in managing two risks more directly related to human health. Experts responded with a wide uncertainty spread for a regulated threshold of minor, major and catastrophic leakage. A companion paper discusses elicitation findings for issues related to risk assessment.","PeriodicalId":35420,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/ijram.2019.103334","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk management in carbon capture and geological storage: insights from a structured expert elicitation\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Larkin, R. Gracie, A. Shafiei, M. Dusseault, M. Sarkarfarshi, W. Aspinall, D. Krewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ijram.2019.103334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With a focus on risk management (RM) in injection and storage for carbon capture and geological sequestration (CCS), an expert elicitation of scientific judgements quantified collective uncertainty ranges for a number of difficult environmental and human health risk challenges. Results suggest similarities and differences in opinions, an outcome that may be reflective of both the newness and the complexity of this technology. A suitable monitoring period was estimated at about a century; however, uncertainty was three orders of magnitude, with an upper (5th percentile) value of almost 1,000 years. For selected low probability high impact georisks, only site selection and monitoring were considered 'very' effective RM options. Monitoring, well integrity studies, emergency response plan, automatic emergency shut down system and training were considered 'very' or 'extremely' effective in managing two risks more directly related to human health. Experts responded with a wide uncertainty spread for a regulated threshold of minor, major and catastrophic leakage. A companion paper discusses elicitation findings for issues related to risk assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/ijram.2019.103334\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijram.2019.103334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijram.2019.103334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

重点关注碳捕获和地质封存(CCS)注入和储存过程中的风险管理(RM),专家对科学判断的启发量化了一些困难的环境和人类健康风险挑战的集体不确定性范围。研究结果表明,人们的观点有相似之处,也有不同之处,这一结果可能反映了这项技术的新颖性和复杂性。适当的监测期估计约为一个世纪;然而,不确定性是三个数量级,其上限(百分之五)值几乎为1000年。对于选定的低概率、高影响地理区域,只有选址和监测被认为是“非常”有效的RM选项。监测、油井完整性研究、应急响应计划、自动紧急关闭系统和培训被认为在管理与人类健康更直接相关的两种风险方面“非常”或“极其”有效。专家们的反应是,对轻微、重大和灾难性泄漏的规定阈值存在广泛的不确定性。一篇配套论文讨论了风险评估相关问题的启发结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk management in carbon capture and geological storage: insights from a structured expert elicitation
With a focus on risk management (RM) in injection and storage for carbon capture and geological sequestration (CCS), an expert elicitation of scientific judgements quantified collective uncertainty ranges for a number of difficult environmental and human health risk challenges. Results suggest similarities and differences in opinions, an outcome that may be reflective of both the newness and the complexity of this technology. A suitable monitoring period was estimated at about a century; however, uncertainty was three orders of magnitude, with an upper (5th percentile) value of almost 1,000 years. For selected low probability high impact georisks, only site selection and monitoring were considered 'very' effective RM options. Monitoring, well integrity studies, emergency response plan, automatic emergency shut down system and training were considered 'very' or 'extremely' effective in managing two risks more directly related to human health. Experts responded with a wide uncertainty spread for a regulated threshold of minor, major and catastrophic leakage. A companion paper discusses elicitation findings for issues related to risk assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management
International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The IJRAM is an interdisciplinary and refereed journal that provides cross learning between: - Different business and economics, as well as scientific and technological, disciplines - Energy industries, environmental and ecological systems - Safety, public health and medical services - Software services, reliability and safety
期刊最新文献
A unified fuzzy system for evaluating work related postural risk score of discomfort prone body parts of workers through rapid upper limb assessment Deciding when defence in depth control strategies are necessary for risk management and crisis response Uncertainty and resilience in strategic management: profile of a robust company Prehospital emergency medical treatment teams' competence to act in an AMOK situation On the use of analytical inequalities for improving reliability and reducing risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1