运动的乐趣:体育课程设计的非参与者

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/25742981.2021.1878918
S. Stevens, Ian Culpan
{"title":"运动的乐趣:体育课程设计的非参与者","authors":"S. Stevens, Ian Culpan","doi":"10.1080/25742981.2021.1878918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article seeks to expose the unconscious exclusion of the joy of movement in PE curriculum, using the New Zealand Curriculum (NZC) as a case study. The article discusses the joy of movement, the social construction of movement pleasure and the role of movement pleasure in the physical education setting. An analogy of the ‘non-participant’ is used to encourage readers to think about the similarities of the entrenched biases that occur when we design curriculum, units of work, or lessons in PE. These biases often shape lessons that instinctively neglect the ‘non-participant’; and in a similar fashion shape lessons where ‘joy’ or ‘pleasure’ are simply addendums or bi-products. The article pays homage to the challenges the physical education profession has faced with regard to performativity; acknowledging that this has marginalised the inclusion of pleasure as an explicit outcome in curriculum. Nevertheless, the authors draw from literature to express the importance of movement pleasure in PE, and subsequently encourage those designing curriculum to think about joy more explicitly in achievement objectives or outcomes.","PeriodicalId":36887,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education","volume":"12 1","pages":"80 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/25742981.2021.1878918","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The joy of movement: the non-participant in physical education curriculum design\",\"authors\":\"S. Stevens, Ian Culpan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25742981.2021.1878918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article seeks to expose the unconscious exclusion of the joy of movement in PE curriculum, using the New Zealand Curriculum (NZC) as a case study. The article discusses the joy of movement, the social construction of movement pleasure and the role of movement pleasure in the physical education setting. An analogy of the ‘non-participant’ is used to encourage readers to think about the similarities of the entrenched biases that occur when we design curriculum, units of work, or lessons in PE. These biases often shape lessons that instinctively neglect the ‘non-participant’; and in a similar fashion shape lessons where ‘joy’ or ‘pleasure’ are simply addendums or bi-products. The article pays homage to the challenges the physical education profession has faced with regard to performativity; acknowledging that this has marginalised the inclusion of pleasure as an explicit outcome in curriculum. Nevertheless, the authors draw from literature to express the importance of movement pleasure in PE, and subsequently encourage those designing curriculum to think about joy more explicitly in achievement objectives or outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"80 - 93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/25742981.2021.1878918\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2021.1878918\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2021.1878918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要本文以新西兰课程为例,试图揭示体育课程中对运动乐趣的无意识排斥。本文论述了运动的乐趣、运动乐趣的社会建构以及运动乐趣在体育教学中的作用。“非参与者”的比喻被用来鼓励读者思考在我们设计体育课程、作业单元或课程时发生的根深蒂固的偏见的相似之处。这些偏见往往会形成本能地忽视“非参与者”的课程;在类似的时尚造型课程中,“快乐”或“愉悦”只是附加词或双产品。这篇文章对体育专业在表演性方面所面临的挑战表示敬意;承认这已经将快乐作为一种明确的结果纳入课程中。尽管如此,作者还是从文献中表达了运动乐趣在体育中的重要性,并随后鼓励课程设计人员在成就目标或结果中更明确地思考快乐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The joy of movement: the non-participant in physical education curriculum design
ABSTRACT This article seeks to expose the unconscious exclusion of the joy of movement in PE curriculum, using the New Zealand Curriculum (NZC) as a case study. The article discusses the joy of movement, the social construction of movement pleasure and the role of movement pleasure in the physical education setting. An analogy of the ‘non-participant’ is used to encourage readers to think about the similarities of the entrenched biases that occur when we design curriculum, units of work, or lessons in PE. These biases often shape lessons that instinctively neglect the ‘non-participant’; and in a similar fashion shape lessons where ‘joy’ or ‘pleasure’ are simply addendums or bi-products. The article pays homage to the challenges the physical education profession has faced with regard to performativity; acknowledging that this has marginalised the inclusion of pleasure as an explicit outcome in curriculum. Nevertheless, the authors draw from literature to express the importance of movement pleasure in PE, and subsequently encourage those designing curriculum to think about joy more explicitly in achievement objectives or outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Physical education pedagogies for health Physical education pedagogies for health , edited by Lorraine Cale and Jo Harris, London and New York, Routledge, 2022, 142 pp., US$64.95 ISBN 978-1-003-22590-4. ‘Publicness of education’: framing possibilities for decolonising practices in Health and Physical Education Preservice teachers’ health literacy levels and perceptions of teaching capabilities: an Australian case study ‘Sometimes unfair is fair’: New Zealand HPE teachers’ perceptions of social justice Benefits of hybridising the activist approach and teaching games for understanding to empower girls in physical education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1