从Ceridwen Dovey的《只有动物》(2014)重新审视拟人化的“问题”

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN AUSTRALIAN LITERARY STUDIES Pub Date : 2019-07-05 DOI:10.20314/ALS.80AC7927CD
C. Archer-Lean
{"title":"从Ceridwen Dovey的《只有动物》(2014)重新审视拟人化的“问题”","authors":"C. Archer-Lean","doi":"10.20314/ALS.80AC7927CD","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Ceridwen Dovey’s short story cycle, Only the Animals, inter-textual allusions to established fictional animals are imposed onto settings of human conflict and ventriloquised through diverse animal subjects. This paper defends narrating from a non-human animal perspective, not as a radical act, but as a move to reinvigorate our conceptions of human-animal relations. Meaningful encounters between human and non-human animals are presented with a recognition of the impossibility of full and mutual inter-species understanding. The juxtaposition of the limits of figuring literary animals with human/animal intimacy and incomprehension marks Dovey’s work as a logical progression of some ideas presented in J. M. Coetzee’s Elizabeth Costello. This paper reads Dovey’s deployment of textual self-referentiality and overt intersection with Coetzee’s work in Only the Animals as a reflexive writing form that works to critique another representational dispossession: that of anthropocentric realism. Both works understand that humans do not share language with non-human animals but we often meet questions of the animal through stories. This makes the stories we tell highly significant; indeed – vital – components of the cultural landscape.","PeriodicalId":42299,"journal":{"name":"AUSTRALIAN LITERARY STUDIES","volume":"364 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the ‘Problem’ of Anthropomorphism through Ceridwen Dovey’s *Only the Animals* (2014)\",\"authors\":\"C. Archer-Lean\",\"doi\":\"10.20314/ALS.80AC7927CD\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Ceridwen Dovey’s short story cycle, Only the Animals, inter-textual allusions to established fictional animals are imposed onto settings of human conflict and ventriloquised through diverse animal subjects. This paper defends narrating from a non-human animal perspective, not as a radical act, but as a move to reinvigorate our conceptions of human-animal relations. Meaningful encounters between human and non-human animals are presented with a recognition of the impossibility of full and mutual inter-species understanding. The juxtaposition of the limits of figuring literary animals with human/animal intimacy and incomprehension marks Dovey’s work as a logical progression of some ideas presented in J. M. Coetzee’s Elizabeth Costello. This paper reads Dovey’s deployment of textual self-referentiality and overt intersection with Coetzee’s work in Only the Animals as a reflexive writing form that works to critique another representational dispossession: that of anthropocentric realism. Both works understand that humans do not share language with non-human animals but we often meet questions of the animal through stories. This makes the stories we tell highly significant; indeed – vital – components of the cultural landscape.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AUSTRALIAN LITERARY STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"364 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AUSTRALIAN LITERARY STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20314/ALS.80AC7927CD\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AUSTRALIAN LITERARY STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20314/ALS.80AC7927CD","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在Ceridwen Dovey的短篇小说《只有动物》中,对既定虚构动物的跨文本典故被强加在人类冲突的背景下,并通过不同的动物主题进行腹语表达。本文为从非人类动物的角度进行叙述辩护,这不是一种激进的行为,而是一种重振我们对人类与动物关系概念的举措。人类和非人类动物之间有意义的相遇是在认识到物种之间不可能完全相互理解的情况下进行的。将文学动物形象的局限性与人/动物的亲密感和不理解并置,标志着多维的作品是对J·M·库切的《伊丽莎白·科斯特洛》中提出的一些想法的逻辑推进。本文将多维在《只有动物》中对文本自指性和与库切作品的公开交叉的部署解读为一种反射性的写作形式,旨在批判另一种表征性的剥夺:以人类为中心的现实主义。这两部作品都明白,人类并不与非人类动物共享语言,但我们经常通过故事来遇到动物的问题。这使得我们讲述的故事意义重大;文化景观的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revisiting the ‘Problem’ of Anthropomorphism through Ceridwen Dovey’s *Only the Animals* (2014)
In Ceridwen Dovey’s short story cycle, Only the Animals, inter-textual allusions to established fictional animals are imposed onto settings of human conflict and ventriloquised through diverse animal subjects. This paper defends narrating from a non-human animal perspective, not as a radical act, but as a move to reinvigorate our conceptions of human-animal relations. Meaningful encounters between human and non-human animals are presented with a recognition of the impossibility of full and mutual inter-species understanding. The juxtaposition of the limits of figuring literary animals with human/animal intimacy and incomprehension marks Dovey’s work as a logical progression of some ideas presented in J. M. Coetzee’s Elizabeth Costello. This paper reads Dovey’s deployment of textual self-referentiality and overt intersection with Coetzee’s work in Only the Animals as a reflexive writing form that works to critique another representational dispossession: that of anthropocentric realism. Both works understand that humans do not share language with non-human animals but we often meet questions of the animal through stories. This makes the stories we tell highly significant; indeed – vital – components of the cultural landscape.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AUSTRALIAN LITERARY STUDIES
AUSTRALIAN LITERARY STUDIES LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Review of *The Cambridge Companion to the Australian Novel*, edited by Nicholas Birns and Louis Klee Textual Encounters of the Bird Kind: Dal Stivens and the Night Parrot Review of *Decolonising Animals*, edited by Rick de Vos ‘I Want a Mortgage and Comfort’: Consumption, Totality and Identity in Australian Gay Fiction Ruth Park’s Charlie Rothe: Reading *Harp in the South* (1948) and *Poor Man’s Orange* (1949)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1