A. Cervantes-Arriaga, Cynthia Sarabia-Tapia, O. Esquivel-Zapata, Susana López-Alamillo, Etienne Reséndiz-Henriquez, T. Corona, M. Rodríguez‐Violante
{"title":"帕金森病患者诊断途径中的陷阱和注意事项","authors":"A. Cervantes-Arriaga, Cynthia Sarabia-Tapia, O. Esquivel-Zapata, Susana López-Alamillo, Etienne Reséndiz-Henriquez, T. Corona, M. Rodríguez‐Violante","doi":"10.24875/rmn.21000041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We carried out a cross-sectional study to identify the factors involved in each stage of the diagnosis pathway that may lead to a diagnostic delay in persons with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with PD were included. A questionnaire assessing the recognition of the initial symptoms, pathway to seek attention diagnosis and perception on the diagnostic time and identified barriers was applied. Diagnosis delay was defined as ≥ 12 months between initial recognition of the symptom and the definitive diagnosis of PD. Results: A total of 114 patients (57.9% male) with PD were included in the study. The overall median time of the diagnosis pathway was 14.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 31) months and the longest time in this pathway was between the first medical consultation and the definitive diagnosis of PD, a median of 9 (IQR 14) months. The main appraisal of the first symptom was being “not worried” (48.2%). The mains reasons for seeking medical attention were symptom worsening (42.1%). Patient’s perception on the diagnostic time was reported as very adequate/adequate in 52.7%. Barriers delaying the diagnosis identified included the belief of spontaneous symptoms relief and lack of trust in their doctor. Conclusion: Both the person with PD and the physician play a shared role in the diagnosis of PD. Improving the awareness of the disease, as well as improving medical education on PD, could result in a timely diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":53921,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mexicana de Neurociencia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pitfalls and caveats in the diagnostic pathway of people with Parkinson’s disease\",\"authors\":\"A. Cervantes-Arriaga, Cynthia Sarabia-Tapia, O. Esquivel-Zapata, Susana López-Alamillo, Etienne Reséndiz-Henriquez, T. Corona, M. Rodríguez‐Violante\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/rmn.21000041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: We carried out a cross-sectional study to identify the factors involved in each stage of the diagnosis pathway that may lead to a diagnostic delay in persons with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with PD were included. A questionnaire assessing the recognition of the initial symptoms, pathway to seek attention diagnosis and perception on the diagnostic time and identified barriers was applied. Diagnosis delay was defined as ≥ 12 months between initial recognition of the symptom and the definitive diagnosis of PD. Results: A total of 114 patients (57.9% male) with PD were included in the study. The overall median time of the diagnosis pathway was 14.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 31) months and the longest time in this pathway was between the first medical consultation and the definitive diagnosis of PD, a median of 9 (IQR 14) months. The main appraisal of the first symptom was being “not worried” (48.2%). The mains reasons for seeking medical attention were symptom worsening (42.1%). Patient’s perception on the diagnostic time was reported as very adequate/adequate in 52.7%. Barriers delaying the diagnosis identified included the belief of spontaneous symptoms relief and lack of trust in their doctor. Conclusion: Both the person with PD and the physician play a shared role in the diagnosis of PD. Improving the awareness of the disease, as well as improving medical education on PD, could result in a timely diagnosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Mexicana de Neurociencia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Mexicana de Neurociencia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/rmn.21000041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Mexicana de Neurociencia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/rmn.21000041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pitfalls and caveats in the diagnostic pathway of people with Parkinson’s disease
Objective: We carried out a cross-sectional study to identify the factors involved in each stage of the diagnosis pathway that may lead to a diagnostic delay in persons with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with PD were included. A questionnaire assessing the recognition of the initial symptoms, pathway to seek attention diagnosis and perception on the diagnostic time and identified barriers was applied. Diagnosis delay was defined as ≥ 12 months between initial recognition of the symptom and the definitive diagnosis of PD. Results: A total of 114 patients (57.9% male) with PD were included in the study. The overall median time of the diagnosis pathway was 14.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 31) months and the longest time in this pathway was between the first medical consultation and the definitive diagnosis of PD, a median of 9 (IQR 14) months. The main appraisal of the first symptom was being “not worried” (48.2%). The mains reasons for seeking medical attention were symptom worsening (42.1%). Patient’s perception on the diagnostic time was reported as very adequate/adequate in 52.7%. Barriers delaying the diagnosis identified included the belief of spontaneous symptoms relief and lack of trust in their doctor. Conclusion: Both the person with PD and the physician play a shared role in the diagnosis of PD. Improving the awareness of the disease, as well as improving medical education on PD, could result in a timely diagnosis.