{"title":"应用残余语法评分对NSTEMI患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后不完全血运重建的量化及影响","authors":"Syed Waqar Ahmed, N. Rahman","doi":"10.47144/phj.v55isupplement1.2421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of rSS after PCI for NSTEMI in terms of all-cause mortality and MACE (Major adverse cardiac event) at 3 years of follow-up. \nMethodology: A retrospective analysis of 115 consecutive NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI at the Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi between January 2016 and December 2016 was performed. 7 patients were excluded from the final analysis due to missing data (n=108). The SYNTAX scores before (baseline syntax=bSS) and after PCI (rSS) were calculated. Patients were stratified as CR if rSS =0, RICR if rSS >0 and ≤8 and ICR if rSS >8. \nResults: Patients that achieved CR were 44 (40.7%), RICR were 40 (37.7%) and ICR were 24 (22.2%). After three-year follow-up, ICR patients had the highest incidence of both all-cause mortality [(CR) 4.5% vs. (RICR) 5% vs. (ICR) 37.5% respectively; p<0.001] and major adverse cardiovascular (MACE) defined as composite of follow up cardiac death, MI and revascularization [(CR) 5% vs. (RICR) 10% vs. (ICR) 50% respectively; p<0.001]. There was no difference in the incidence of all-cause death (4.5% vs. 5%; p=0.92) or MACE (4.5% vs 10%, p=0.332) in patients with CR and ICR respectively (Table 1). \nTable 1: Outcomes at two years of follow-up according to residual SYNTAX score \nMACE- Major Adverse cardiac event (Cardiac death,MI or Revascularisation); CR- complete revascularization; RICR- Reasonable incomplete revascularization; ICR- Incomplete revascularization \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \nCR (rSS=0) \nN= 44 \n \n \nRICR (rSS >0 and ≤8) \nN= 40 \n \n \nICR (rSS>8) \nN= 24 \n \n \nP value \n \n \nCR vs RICR \np value \n \n \nCR vs ICR \nP value \n \n \nRICR vs ICR \nP value \n \n \n \n \nAll cause death \n \n \n2 (4.5) \n \n \n2 (5) \n \n \n9 (37.5) \n \n \n<0.001 \n \n \n0.92 \n \n \n<0.001 \n \n \n0.001 \n \n \n \n \nCardiac death \n \n \n1 (2.3) \n \n \n2 (5) \n \n \n7 (29.2) \n \n \n0.001 \n \n \n0.50 \n \n \n0.001 \n \n \n0.007 \n \n \n \n \nMI \n \n \n1 (2.3) \n \n \n1 (2.5) \n \n \n8 (33.3) \n \n \n<0.001 \n \n \n0.949 \n \n \n<0.001 \n \n \n0.001 \n \n \n \n \nRevascularization \n \n \n1 (2.3) \n \n \n3 (7.5) \n \n \n3 (12.5) \n \n \n0.25 \n \n \n0.261 \n \n \n0.087 \n \n \n0.51 \n \n \n \n \nMACE \n \n \n2 (4.5) \n \n \n4 (10) \n \n \n12 (50) \n \n \n<0.001 \n \n \n0.332 \n \n \n<0.001 \n \n \n<0.001 \n \n \n \n \nConclusion: The residual SYNTAX score (rSS) is a useful tool in quantifying incomplete revascularization in patients undergoing PCI for NSTEMI. ICR appears to confer a higher three-year mortality and MACE, however outcomes for RICR and CR were comparable. Hence the calculation of rSS in daily practice may also be used to determine a reasonable level of revascularization in patients where complete revascularization may not be possible.","PeriodicalId":42273,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A QUANTIFICATION AND IMPACT OF INCOMPLETE REVASCULARIZATION USING RESIDUAL SYNTAX SCORE IN NSTEMI PATIENTS AFTER PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION\",\"authors\":\"Syed Waqar Ahmed, N. Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.47144/phj.v55isupplement1.2421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of rSS after PCI for NSTEMI in terms of all-cause mortality and MACE (Major adverse cardiac event) at 3 years of follow-up. \\nMethodology: A retrospective analysis of 115 consecutive NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI at the Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi between January 2016 and December 2016 was performed. 7 patients were excluded from the final analysis due to missing data (n=108). The SYNTAX scores before (baseline syntax=bSS) and after PCI (rSS) were calculated. Patients were stratified as CR if rSS =0, RICR if rSS >0 and ≤8 and ICR if rSS >8. \\nResults: Patients that achieved CR were 44 (40.7%), RICR were 40 (37.7%) and ICR were 24 (22.2%). After three-year follow-up, ICR patients had the highest incidence of both all-cause mortality [(CR) 4.5% vs. (RICR) 5% vs. (ICR) 37.5% respectively; p<0.001] and major adverse cardiovascular (MACE) defined as composite of follow up cardiac death, MI and revascularization [(CR) 5% vs. (RICR) 10% vs. (ICR) 50% respectively; p<0.001]. There was no difference in the incidence of all-cause death (4.5% vs. 5%; p=0.92) or MACE (4.5% vs 10%, p=0.332) in patients with CR and ICR respectively (Table 1). \\nTable 1: Outcomes at two years of follow-up according to residual SYNTAX score \\nMACE- Major Adverse cardiac event (Cardiac death,MI or Revascularisation); CR- complete revascularization; RICR- Reasonable incomplete revascularization; ICR- Incomplete revascularization \\n \\n \\n \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nCR (rSS=0) \\nN= 44 \\n \\n \\nRICR (rSS >0 and ≤8) \\nN= 40 \\n \\n \\nICR (rSS>8) \\nN= 24 \\n \\n \\nP value \\n \\n \\nCR vs RICR \\np value \\n \\n \\nCR vs ICR \\nP value \\n \\n \\nRICR vs ICR \\nP value \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nAll cause death \\n \\n \\n2 (4.5) \\n \\n \\n2 (5) \\n \\n \\n9 (37.5) \\n \\n \\n<0.001 \\n \\n \\n0.92 \\n \\n \\n<0.001 \\n \\n \\n0.001 \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nCardiac death \\n \\n \\n1 (2.3) \\n \\n \\n2 (5) \\n \\n \\n7 (29.2) \\n \\n \\n0.001 \\n \\n \\n0.50 \\n \\n \\n0.001 \\n \\n \\n0.007 \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nMI \\n \\n \\n1 (2.3) \\n \\n \\n1 (2.5) \\n \\n \\n8 (33.3) \\n \\n \\n<0.001 \\n \\n \\n0.949 \\n \\n \\n<0.001 \\n \\n \\n0.001 \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nRevascularization \\n \\n \\n1 (2.3) \\n \\n \\n3 (7.5) \\n \\n \\n3 (12.5) \\n \\n \\n0.25 \\n \\n \\n0.261 \\n \\n \\n0.087 \\n \\n \\n0.51 \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nMACE \\n \\n \\n2 (4.5) \\n \\n \\n4 (10) \\n \\n \\n12 (50) \\n \\n \\n<0.001 \\n \\n \\n0.332 \\n \\n \\n<0.001 \\n \\n \\n<0.001 \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nConclusion: The residual SYNTAX score (rSS) is a useful tool in quantifying incomplete revascularization in patients undergoing PCI for NSTEMI. ICR appears to confer a higher three-year mortality and MACE, however outcomes for RICR and CR were comparable. Hence the calculation of rSS in daily practice may also be used to determine a reasonable level of revascularization in patients where complete revascularization may not be possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47144/phj.v55isupplement1.2421\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47144/phj.v55isupplement1.2421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A QUANTIFICATION AND IMPACT OF INCOMPLETE REVASCULARIZATION USING RESIDUAL SYNTAX SCORE IN NSTEMI PATIENTS AFTER PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of rSS after PCI for NSTEMI in terms of all-cause mortality and MACE (Major adverse cardiac event) at 3 years of follow-up.
Methodology: A retrospective analysis of 115 consecutive NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI at the Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi between January 2016 and December 2016 was performed. 7 patients were excluded from the final analysis due to missing data (n=108). The SYNTAX scores before (baseline syntax=bSS) and after PCI (rSS) were calculated. Patients were stratified as CR if rSS =0, RICR if rSS >0 and ≤8 and ICR if rSS >8.
Results: Patients that achieved CR were 44 (40.7%), RICR were 40 (37.7%) and ICR were 24 (22.2%). After three-year follow-up, ICR patients had the highest incidence of both all-cause mortality [(CR) 4.5% vs. (RICR) 5% vs. (ICR) 37.5% respectively; p<0.001] and major adverse cardiovascular (MACE) defined as composite of follow up cardiac death, MI and revascularization [(CR) 5% vs. (RICR) 10% vs. (ICR) 50% respectively; p<0.001]. There was no difference in the incidence of all-cause death (4.5% vs. 5%; p=0.92) or MACE (4.5% vs 10%, p=0.332) in patients with CR and ICR respectively (Table 1).
Table 1: Outcomes at two years of follow-up according to residual SYNTAX score
MACE- Major Adverse cardiac event (Cardiac death,MI or Revascularisation); CR- complete revascularization; RICR- Reasonable incomplete revascularization; ICR- Incomplete revascularization
CR (rSS=0)
N= 44
RICR (rSS >0 and ≤8)
N= 40
ICR (rSS>8)
N= 24
P value
CR vs RICR
p value
CR vs ICR
P value
RICR vs ICR
P value
All cause death
2 (4.5)
2 (5)
9 (37.5)
<0.001
0.92
<0.001
0.001
Cardiac death
1 (2.3)
2 (5)
7 (29.2)
0.001
0.50
0.001
0.007
MI
1 (2.3)
1 (2.5)
8 (33.3)
<0.001
0.949
<0.001
0.001
Revascularization
1 (2.3)
3 (7.5)
3 (12.5)
0.25
0.261
0.087
0.51
MACE
2 (4.5)
4 (10)
12 (50)
<0.001
0.332
<0.001
<0.001
Conclusion: The residual SYNTAX score (rSS) is a useful tool in quantifying incomplete revascularization in patients undergoing PCI for NSTEMI. ICR appears to confer a higher three-year mortality and MACE, however outcomes for RICR and CR were comparable. Hence the calculation of rSS in daily practice may also be used to determine a reasonable level of revascularization in patients where complete revascularization may not be possible.