走出危机,学习塑造未来赠款

IF 0.7 Q3 SOCIAL ISSUES Foundation Review Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.9707/1944-5660.1608
Stacie Cherner
{"title":"走出危机,学习塑造未来赠款","authors":"Stacie Cherner","doi":"10.9707/1944-5660.1608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like other philanthropic organizations during the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Jim Joseph Foundation took steps to loosen grant requirements, support CEOs and leadership teams, and provide funding for emergencies and innovations. Another area that required flexibility was in the re-examination of learning plans to take advantage of the \"forced experimentation\" imposed by the pandemic lockdown. In March 2020, the foundation paused ongoing research and evaluation projects to determine the extent to which the pandemic and economic crisis would impact the quality of the data, and then crafted new learning questions and plans to take advantage of the opportunities in the moment. It pivoted to redeploy resources to assess how the internal foundation team responded to the crisis, how grantees pivoted to online programming, and how the crisis and online programming were experienced by target populations.","PeriodicalId":42766,"journal":{"name":"Foundation Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Out of Crisis, Learnings Shape Future Grantmaking\",\"authors\":\"Stacie Cherner\",\"doi\":\"10.9707/1944-5660.1608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Like other philanthropic organizations during the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Jim Joseph Foundation took steps to loosen grant requirements, support CEOs and leadership teams, and provide funding for emergencies and innovations. Another area that required flexibility was in the re-examination of learning plans to take advantage of the \\\"forced experimentation\\\" imposed by the pandemic lockdown. In March 2020, the foundation paused ongoing research and evaluation projects to determine the extent to which the pandemic and economic crisis would impact the quality of the data, and then crafted new learning questions and plans to take advantage of the opportunities in the moment. It pivoted to redeploy resources to assess how the internal foundation team responded to the crisis, how grantees pivoted to online programming, and how the crisis and online programming were experienced by target populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foundation Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foundation Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1608\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病大流行的最初几周,与其他慈善组织一样,吉姆·约瑟夫基金会采取措施放宽了拨款要求,支持首席执行官和领导团队,并为紧急情况和创新提供资金。另一个需要灵活性的领域是重新审查学习计划,以利用疫情封锁带来的“强制实验”。2020年3月,该基金会暂停了正在进行的研究和评估项目,以确定疫情和经济危机对数据质量的影响程度,然后制定了新的学习问题和计划,以利用当前的机会。它转向重新部署资源,以评估内部基金会团队如何应对危机,受资助者如何转向在线编程,以及目标人群如何体验危机和在线编程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Out of Crisis, Learnings Shape Future Grantmaking
Like other philanthropic organizations during the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Jim Joseph Foundation took steps to loosen grant requirements, support CEOs and leadership teams, and provide funding for emergencies and innovations. Another area that required flexibility was in the re-examination of learning plans to take advantage of the "forced experimentation" imposed by the pandemic lockdown. In March 2020, the foundation paused ongoing research and evaluation projects to determine the extent to which the pandemic and economic crisis would impact the quality of the data, and then crafted new learning questions and plans to take advantage of the opportunities in the moment. It pivoted to redeploy resources to assess how the internal foundation team responded to the crisis, how grantees pivoted to online programming, and how the crisis and online programming were experienced by target populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foundation Review
Foundation Review SOCIAL ISSUES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Foundation Review is the first peer-reviewed journal of philanthropy, written by and for foundation staff and boards and those who work with them. Each quarterly issue provides peer-reviewed reports about the field of philanthropy, including reports by foundations on their own work. The Foundation Review is a hybrid journal, with a mix of subscriber-only and open-access content. Sponsored issues may be completely open access. Authors may pay to have articles made open access. All articles become open access two years after publication.
期刊最新文献
Theory of a Philanthropic Alliance: The Case of the Global Alliance for the Future of Food Place-Based Initiatives by National Funders: Reflections from a Recovering Place-Based Funder Evaluating Evaluation Policy in the X Foundation Achieving Sustainability in Community Health Initiatives: Follow the Money TFR 15.1 Full Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1