用分级网状脉序估算叶片气孔密度

IF 1.5 4区 生物学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES Botany Letters Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.1080/23818107.2022.2156600
P. Shi, L. Wang, Ü. Niinemets, Yabing Jiao, K. Niklas
{"title":"用分级网状脉序估算叶片气孔密度","authors":"P. Shi, L. Wang, Ü. Niinemets, Yabing Jiao, K. Niklas","doi":"10.1080/23818107.2022.2156600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Stomatal density (SD) is important to photosynthetic rates. However, it is time-consuming to measure SD. Here, we provide a method for estimating SD based on the scaling relationship between SD and mean nearest neighbour distance (MNND) of sampled stomatal centres. 397 leaves from eight Magnoliaceae species were used for this study. For each leaf, three 1.2 mm × 0.9 mm lamina sections, positioned equidistantly between leaf left margin and midrib, were examined (in total 1189 sections). SD and MNND were calculated for each section. Regression protocols were used to test for a negative SD vs. MNND scaling relationship at the species and family levels. Additionally, 10 to 200 stomata from each section were randomly sampled to check for the prediction accuracy of SD using the SD vs MNND scaling relationship. There were significant differences in SD among the different lamina positions for 7 of 8 species. The inverse SD vs MNND scaling relationship was validated at the species and family levels. For the pooled data, the MNND values using 14, 25 and 50 stomata accounted for >80%, 85% and 90% of the variance in SD on a log-log scale, respectively. SD was characterized by high interspecific variability, and within-leaf variability, decreasing from the position near the midrib to that near the leaf margin. SD scaled inversely with MNND for the eight species. Thus, using the rapidly estimated trait MNND significantly simplifies and expedites the estimation of SD.","PeriodicalId":54302,"journal":{"name":"Botany Letters","volume":"170 1","pages":"269 - 277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of stomatal density of leaves with hierarchical reticulate venation\",\"authors\":\"P. Shi, L. Wang, Ü. Niinemets, Yabing Jiao, K. Niklas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23818107.2022.2156600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Stomatal density (SD) is important to photosynthetic rates. However, it is time-consuming to measure SD. Here, we provide a method for estimating SD based on the scaling relationship between SD and mean nearest neighbour distance (MNND) of sampled stomatal centres. 397 leaves from eight Magnoliaceae species were used for this study. For each leaf, three 1.2 mm × 0.9 mm lamina sections, positioned equidistantly between leaf left margin and midrib, were examined (in total 1189 sections). SD and MNND were calculated for each section. Regression protocols were used to test for a negative SD vs. MNND scaling relationship at the species and family levels. Additionally, 10 to 200 stomata from each section were randomly sampled to check for the prediction accuracy of SD using the SD vs MNND scaling relationship. There were significant differences in SD among the different lamina positions for 7 of 8 species. The inverse SD vs MNND scaling relationship was validated at the species and family levels. For the pooled data, the MNND values using 14, 25 and 50 stomata accounted for >80%, 85% and 90% of the variance in SD on a log-log scale, respectively. SD was characterized by high interspecific variability, and within-leaf variability, decreasing from the position near the midrib to that near the leaf margin. SD scaled inversely with MNND for the eight species. Thus, using the rapidly estimated trait MNND significantly simplifies and expedites the estimation of SD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Botany Letters\",\"volume\":\"170 1\",\"pages\":\"269 - 277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Botany Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2022.2156600\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Botany Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2022.2156600","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

气孔密度对光合速率有重要影响。然而,测量SD是耗时的。在这里,我们提供了一种基于SD和采样气孔中心的平均最近邻距离(MNND)之间的比例关系来估计SD的方法。本研究使用了8个木兰科植物的397片叶子。对于每片叶子,检查了三个1.2毫米×0.9毫米的叶片切片,这些切片等距放置在叶子左边缘和中脉之间(总共1189个切片)。计算每个切片的SD和MNND。回归方案用于在物种和家族水平上测试SD与MNND的负比例关系。此外,对每个切片的10至200个气孔进行随机采样,以使用SD与MNND的比例关系来检查SD的预测准确性。8个种中有7个种的SD在不同的叶片位置之间存在显著差异。在物种和科水平上验证了SD与MNND的逆比例关系。对于合并数据,使用14、25和50个气孔的MNND值在对数-对数尺度上分别占SD方差的>80%、85%和90%。SD具有较高的种间变异性和叶内变异性,从靠近中脉的位置向靠近叶缘的位置递减。SD与MNND成反比。因此,使用快速估计的性状MNND显著简化和加快了SD的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of stomatal density of leaves with hierarchical reticulate venation
ABSTRACT Stomatal density (SD) is important to photosynthetic rates. However, it is time-consuming to measure SD. Here, we provide a method for estimating SD based on the scaling relationship between SD and mean nearest neighbour distance (MNND) of sampled stomatal centres. 397 leaves from eight Magnoliaceae species were used for this study. For each leaf, three 1.2 mm × 0.9 mm lamina sections, positioned equidistantly between leaf left margin and midrib, were examined (in total 1189 sections). SD and MNND were calculated for each section. Regression protocols were used to test for a negative SD vs. MNND scaling relationship at the species and family levels. Additionally, 10 to 200 stomata from each section were randomly sampled to check for the prediction accuracy of SD using the SD vs MNND scaling relationship. There were significant differences in SD among the different lamina positions for 7 of 8 species. The inverse SD vs MNND scaling relationship was validated at the species and family levels. For the pooled data, the MNND values using 14, 25 and 50 stomata accounted for >80%, 85% and 90% of the variance in SD on a log-log scale, respectively. SD was characterized by high interspecific variability, and within-leaf variability, decreasing from the position near the midrib to that near the leaf margin. SD scaled inversely with MNND for the eight species. Thus, using the rapidly estimated trait MNND significantly simplifies and expedites the estimation of SD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Botany Letters
Botany Letters Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Botany Letters is an international scientific journal, published by the French Botanical Society (Société botanique de France) in partnership with Taylor & Francis. Botany Letters replaces Acta Botanica Gallica, which was created in 1993, building on over a century of renowned publications by the Société botanique de France.
期刊最新文献
Transcriptomic analysis reveals differential gene expression patterns during cannabis leaf morphogenesis and phase transition A new heteropolar Staurosirella species (Staurosiraceae, Bacillariophyceae), widely distributed in Europe Floral structure and nectary anatomy of Bertholletia excelsa (Lecythidaceae) The effect of pollen origin (self- and cross-pollination) on seed production and viability in Ophrys (Orchidaceae) Is there variation in ten woody species reproductive phenology within the Atlantic Forest biodiversity hotspot?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1