中国银行业效率:巴塞尔协议II前后的比较分析

S. Mohanty, Hong-Jen Lin
{"title":"中国银行业效率:巴塞尔协议II前后的比较分析","authors":"S. Mohanty, Hong-Jen Lin","doi":"10.1142/s0219091521500107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the effects of Basel II and Basel III capital adequacy rules and the regulatory framework adopted by Chinese banking regulators on the efficiency of the banking sector in China during the post-Basel II era (2007–2017) and compares the results with that of the pre-Basel II era (1996–2006). The study finds that both cost and profit efficiency of the banking industry have improved significantly from the pre-Basel II era (1996–2006) to the post-Basel II era (2007–2017). Subperiod analyses show that the risk-based capital ratio (Tier 1 capital ratio) is significantly positively associated with profit efficiency during both pre- and post-Basel II eras. Overall, the “Big Four” national banks and regional commercial banks signal higher profit efficiency during the post-Basel II era.","PeriodicalId":45653,"journal":{"name":"Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency in China’s Banking Sector: A Comparative Analysis of Pre- and Post-Basel II Eras\",\"authors\":\"S. Mohanty, Hong-Jen Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s0219091521500107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the effects of Basel II and Basel III capital adequacy rules and the regulatory framework adopted by Chinese banking regulators on the efficiency of the banking sector in China during the post-Basel II era (2007–2017) and compares the results with that of the pre-Basel II era (1996–2006). The study finds that both cost and profit efficiency of the banking industry have improved significantly from the pre-Basel II era (1996–2006) to the post-Basel II era (2007–2017). Subperiod analyses show that the risk-based capital ratio (Tier 1 capital ratio) is significantly positively associated with profit efficiency during both pre- and post-Basel II eras. Overall, the “Big Four” national banks and regional commercial banks signal higher profit efficiency during the post-Basel II era.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219091521500107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219091521500107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究考察了后巴塞尔协议时代(2007-2017年),巴塞尔协议II和巴塞尔协议III资本充足率规则以及中国银行业监管机构采用的监管框架对中国银行业效率的影响,并将结果与前巴塞尔协议时代(1996-2006年)的结果进行了比较。研究发现,从前巴塞尔协议时代(1996-2006)到后巴塞尔协议时代(2007-2017),银行业的成本效率和利润效率都有显著提高。分阶段分析表明,在巴塞尔协议II之前和之后的时代,基于风险的资本比率(一级资本比率)与利润效率显著正相关。总体而言,“四大”全国性银行和地区性商业银行在后巴塞尔协议II时代显示出更高的利润效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficiency in China’s Banking Sector: A Comparative Analysis of Pre- and Post-Basel II Eras
This study investigates the effects of Basel II and Basel III capital adequacy rules and the regulatory framework adopted by Chinese banking regulators on the efficiency of the banking sector in China during the post-Basel II era (2007–2017) and compares the results with that of the pre-Basel II era (1996–2006). The study finds that both cost and profit efficiency of the banking industry have improved significantly from the pre-Basel II era (1996–2006) to the post-Basel II era (2007–2017). Subperiod analyses show that the risk-based capital ratio (Tier 1 capital ratio) is significantly positively associated with profit efficiency during both pre- and post-Basel II eras. Overall, the “Big Four” national banks and regional commercial banks signal higher profit efficiency during the post-Basel II era.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: This journal concentrates on global interdisciplinary research in finance, economics and accounting. The major topics include: 1. Business, economic and financial relations among the Pacific rim countries. 2. Financial markets and industries. 3. Options and futures markets of the United States and other Pacific rim countries. 4. International accounting issues related to U.S. companies investing in Pacific rim countries. 5. The issue of and strategy for developing Tokyo, Taipei, Shanghai, Sydney, Seoul, Hong Kong, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Bangkok, Jakarta, and Manila as international or regional financial centers. 6. Global monetary and foreign exchange policy, and 7. Other high quality interdisciplinary research in global accounting, business, economics and finance.
期刊最新文献
Implications of pension and other post retirement benefit (oprb) recognition biases on leverage ratio components Fund Flows and Fund Performance on Lottery Funds Revisiting the negative profitability effect on capital structure: Pecking-order or trade-off hypothesis The Moral Licensing Effects of Corporate Reputation on Tax Planning Leveraging accounting professional identity of to pave a route towards sustainable development with role of inclusive leadership
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1