黑人经济赋权所有权重要吗?1994-2014年南非印刷媒体内容中“黑人能见度”的非殖民化分析

IF 1.1 3区 文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION African Journalism Studies Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/23743670.2022.2096090
Prinola Govenden
{"title":"黑人经济赋权所有权重要吗?1994-2014年南非印刷媒体内容中“黑人能见度”的非殖民化分析","authors":"Prinola Govenden","doi":"10.1080/23743670.2022.2096090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ownership is identified as one of the major factors that influence the production of news. South Africa’s print media transformation situation presents an important Global South case study for journalism debates about ownership effects on news. The country’s media transformation agenda is based on the premise that transformation of ownership will automatically lead to a transformation of content on these levels. This study empirically examines whether the racial changes in print media ownership facilitated by black economic empowerment in the first 20 years of South Africa’s democracy (1994–2014) led to transformation of content with a focus on racial stereotypes of blackness. It conducts a decolonial analysis of the representation of blackness in three issues that have framed post-apartheid South Africa: socioeconomic rights; labour issues and protests; black government vs. big business or “white economic elite”. The findings show that despite an increase in black ownership, “inferential racism” of blackness pervades content. The nature of representation also coincides with decolonial theory’s concept of “non-being” and its enunciation of the colonised subject being the “damned of the earth”, in the near invisibility of black people’s struggles, hypervisibility of black leadership shortcomings, and in the depiction of protestors as inherently violent, disorderly, deviants, and criminals. The study concludes that in the case of South Africa ownership does not matter, a change from white ownership to considerable black ownership since 1994 did not significantly “transform” historical racist tropes of blackness in content.","PeriodicalId":54049,"journal":{"name":"African Journalism Studies","volume":"43 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Black Economic Empowerment Ownership Matter? A Decolonial Analysis of “Black Visibility” in South Africa’s Print Media Content, 1994–2014\",\"authors\":\"Prinola Govenden\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23743670.2022.2096090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Ownership is identified as one of the major factors that influence the production of news. South Africa’s print media transformation situation presents an important Global South case study for journalism debates about ownership effects on news. The country’s media transformation agenda is based on the premise that transformation of ownership will automatically lead to a transformation of content on these levels. This study empirically examines whether the racial changes in print media ownership facilitated by black economic empowerment in the first 20 years of South Africa’s democracy (1994–2014) led to transformation of content with a focus on racial stereotypes of blackness. It conducts a decolonial analysis of the representation of blackness in three issues that have framed post-apartheid South Africa: socioeconomic rights; labour issues and protests; black government vs. big business or “white economic elite”. The findings show that despite an increase in black ownership, “inferential racism” of blackness pervades content. The nature of representation also coincides with decolonial theory’s concept of “non-being” and its enunciation of the colonised subject being the “damned of the earth”, in the near invisibility of black people’s struggles, hypervisibility of black leadership shortcomings, and in the depiction of protestors as inherently violent, disorderly, deviants, and criminals. The study concludes that in the case of South Africa ownership does not matter, a change from white ownership to considerable black ownership since 1994 did not significantly “transform” historical racist tropes of blackness in content.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journalism Studies\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journalism Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2022.2096090\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journalism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2022.2096090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

所有权是影响新闻生产的主要因素之一。南非纸媒转型的情况为新闻业关于所有权对新闻的影响的辩论提供了一个重要的全球南方案例研究。国家媒体转型议程的前提是,所有权的转变将自动导致这些层面上内容的转变。本研究实证考察了南非民主的前20年(1994-2014),黑人经济赋权推动的印刷媒体所有权的种族变化是否导致了内容的转变,重点是黑人的种族刻板印象。它对黑人在三个问题上的代表性进行了非殖民化分析,这些问题构成了后种族隔离时代的南非:社会经济权利;劳工问题和抗议;黑人政府vs大企业或“白人经济精英”。调查结果显示,尽管黑人所有权有所增加,但对黑人的“推断性种族主义”仍弥漫在内容中。再现的本质也与非殖民化理论的“非存在”概念及其对被殖民主体的“地球的诅咒”的阐述相吻合,在黑人斗争的几乎不可见性中,在黑人领导缺陷的高度可见性中,在将抗议者描述为天生的暴力,无序,偏差和罪犯中。该研究的结论是,在南非的情况下,所有权并不重要,自1994年以来,从白人所有权到大量黑人所有权的变化并没有显着“改变”历史上黑人的种族主义修辞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Black Economic Empowerment Ownership Matter? A Decolonial Analysis of “Black Visibility” in South Africa’s Print Media Content, 1994–2014
ABSTRACT Ownership is identified as one of the major factors that influence the production of news. South Africa’s print media transformation situation presents an important Global South case study for journalism debates about ownership effects on news. The country’s media transformation agenda is based on the premise that transformation of ownership will automatically lead to a transformation of content on these levels. This study empirically examines whether the racial changes in print media ownership facilitated by black economic empowerment in the first 20 years of South Africa’s democracy (1994–2014) led to transformation of content with a focus on racial stereotypes of blackness. It conducts a decolonial analysis of the representation of blackness in three issues that have framed post-apartheid South Africa: socioeconomic rights; labour issues and protests; black government vs. big business or “white economic elite”. The findings show that despite an increase in black ownership, “inferential racism” of blackness pervades content. The nature of representation also coincides with decolonial theory’s concept of “non-being” and its enunciation of the colonised subject being the “damned of the earth”, in the near invisibility of black people’s struggles, hypervisibility of black leadership shortcomings, and in the depiction of protestors as inherently violent, disorderly, deviants, and criminals. The study concludes that in the case of South Africa ownership does not matter, a change from white ownership to considerable black ownership since 1994 did not significantly “transform” historical racist tropes of blackness in content.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Accredited by the South African Department of Higher Education and Training for university research purposes African Journalism Studies subscribes to the Code of Best Practice for Peer Reviewed Scholarly Journals of the Academy of Science of South Africa. African Journalism Studies ( AJS) aims to contribute to the ongoing extension of the theories, methodologies and empirical data to under-researched areas of knowledge production, through its emphasis on African journalism studies within a broader, comparative perspective of the Global South. AJS strives for theoretical diversity and methodological inclusivity, by developing theoretical approaches and making critical interventions in global scholarly debates. The journal''s comparative and interdisciplinary approach is informed by the related fields of cultural and media studies, communication studies, African studies, politics, and sociology. The field of journalism studies is understood broadly, as including the practices, norms, value systems, frameworks of representation, audiences, platforms, industries, theories and power relations that relate to the production, consumption and study of journalism. A wide definition of journalism is used, which extends beyond news and current affairs to include digital and social media, documentary film and narrative non-fiction.
期刊最新文献
Climate Justice and Other News Frames in the Coverage of Climate Change in Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa Analysing Discourse-Stylistics on Peripheral Journalism Platforms: A Context of Indigenous Language News Outlets on Facebook Network Flow of Campaign Discourses and News Frames: The Changing Fortunes of Twitter/X as a Conduit for Frame-Building Public Support for Local and Community Media in Three Countries: A Comparative Study Reimagining Through Crisis: How the Covid-19 Pandemic Changed the Fortunes and Futures of Journalism Schools and Graduates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1