探索农业大学教师以教学为中心的个人网络:一种混合方法的自我中心网络方法

Gangseok Hur, T. G. Roberts, John Diaz, David Diehl, J. C. Bunch
{"title":"探索农业大学教师以教学为中心的个人网络:一种混合方法的自我中心网络方法","authors":"Gangseok Hur, T. G. Roberts, John Diaz, David Diehl, J. C. Bunch","doi":"10.5032/jae.v64i1.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Faculty members’ network characteristics influence their teaching and the types of information they acquire. Given the gap in empirical knowledge on agriculture university faculty members’ teaching-focused networks, this mixed-methods study focused on identifying characteristics of agriculture university faculty members’ teaching-focused personal networks. We also investigated why faculty members communicated and what topics they discussed with their teaching-focused contacts. Social network theory (Borgatti & Halgin, 2011) and social capital theory (Lin, 2001) guided this study. Utilizing egocentric network analysis, we found that agriculture university faculty members typically communicated with a few close individuals within their departments and in the same discipline. Further, the qualitative study indicated that faculty members’ main rationales for interacting with their teaching-focused contacts were their contacts’ expertise in teaching and subject matter, personal and professional relationships, and approachable personality. In addition, faculty members communicated with their contacts for advice and feedback, information and resources about teaching, administrative matters, and emotional support. The findings showed that faculty participants’ teaching-focused contacts significantly benefited their teaching enhancement and professional development. The study offers valuable insights into faculty members’ teaching-focused personal networks and implications for faculty instructional development.","PeriodicalId":73589,"journal":{"name":"Journal of agricultural education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring teaching-focused personal networks of agriculture university faculty members: A mixed-methods egocentric network approach\",\"authors\":\"Gangseok Hur, T. G. Roberts, John Diaz, David Diehl, J. C. Bunch\",\"doi\":\"10.5032/jae.v64i1.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Faculty members’ network characteristics influence their teaching and the types of information they acquire. Given the gap in empirical knowledge on agriculture university faculty members’ teaching-focused networks, this mixed-methods study focused on identifying characteristics of agriculture university faculty members’ teaching-focused personal networks. We also investigated why faculty members communicated and what topics they discussed with their teaching-focused contacts. Social network theory (Borgatti & Halgin, 2011) and social capital theory (Lin, 2001) guided this study. Utilizing egocentric network analysis, we found that agriculture university faculty members typically communicated with a few close individuals within their departments and in the same discipline. Further, the qualitative study indicated that faculty members’ main rationales for interacting with their teaching-focused contacts were their contacts’ expertise in teaching and subject matter, personal and professional relationships, and approachable personality. In addition, faculty members communicated with their contacts for advice and feedback, information and resources about teaching, administrative matters, and emotional support. The findings showed that faculty participants’ teaching-focused contacts significantly benefited their teaching enhancement and professional development. The study offers valuable insights into faculty members’ teaching-focused personal networks and implications for faculty instructional development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of agricultural education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of agricultural education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i1.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of agricultural education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i1.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教师的网络特征影响他们的教学以及他们获得的信息类型。鉴于农业大学教师教学网络实证知识的差距,本混合方法研究侧重于识别农业大学教师个人教学网络的特征。我们还调查了教员为什么交流,以及他们与以教学为重点的联系人讨论了什么话题。社会网络理论(Borgatti和Halgin,2011)和社会资本理论(Lin,2001)指导了本研究。利用以自我为中心的网络分析,我们发现农业大学的教职员工通常与他们所在部门和同一学科的一些亲密的人交流。此外,定性研究表明,教师与以教学为中心的联系人互动的主要理由是他们的联系人在教学和主题方面的专业知识、个人和职业关系以及平易近人的个性。此外,教职工还与他们的联系人进行了沟通,以获得有关教学、行政事务和情感支持的建议和反馈、信息和资源。研究结果表明,教师参与者以教学为中心的接触显著有利于他们的教学水平提高和专业发展。这项研究为教师专注于教学的个人网络以及对教师教学发展的启示提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring teaching-focused personal networks of agriculture university faculty members: A mixed-methods egocentric network approach
Faculty members’ network characteristics influence their teaching and the types of information they acquire. Given the gap in empirical knowledge on agriculture university faculty members’ teaching-focused networks, this mixed-methods study focused on identifying characteristics of agriculture university faculty members’ teaching-focused personal networks. We also investigated why faculty members communicated and what topics they discussed with their teaching-focused contacts. Social network theory (Borgatti & Halgin, 2011) and social capital theory (Lin, 2001) guided this study. Utilizing egocentric network analysis, we found that agriculture university faculty members typically communicated with a few close individuals within their departments and in the same discipline. Further, the qualitative study indicated that faculty members’ main rationales for interacting with their teaching-focused contacts were their contacts’ expertise in teaching and subject matter, personal and professional relationships, and approachable personality. In addition, faculty members communicated with their contacts for advice and feedback, information and resources about teaching, administrative matters, and emotional support. The findings showed that faculty participants’ teaching-focused contacts significantly benefited their teaching enhancement and professional development. The study offers valuable insights into faculty members’ teaching-focused personal networks and implications for faculty instructional development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The dualism of interdisciplinarity: A model for agriculture, food, and natural resources education Student interest in the national council for agricultural education career pathways AFNR educators’ experiences in an MA program Technical agriculture skills teachers need to teach courses in the animal systems pathway Preparing pre-service agricultural education teachers to teach agricultural mechanics: Are we doing enough?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1