有旧有新:在南非将生殖权利应用于新的生殖技术

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW South African Journal on Human Rights Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/02587203.2020.1776632
B. Shozi
{"title":"有旧有新:在南非将生殖权利应用于新的生殖技术","authors":"B. Shozi","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2020.1776632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract New reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilisation have opened up new avenues for those who wish to have children, and who need no longer be bound by biological limitations to procreation like infertility. However, the choices available to prospective parents have been restricted by the fact that the use of new reproductive technologies in artificial reproduction has been subject to regulation in many parts of the world – including South Africa. These regulations have been challenged on the grounds that they infringe upon the rights of those who want to use these technologies. Underlying these challenges is the claim that the rights which are currently given recognition in our law apply to the use of new reproductive technologies – and this article investigates to what extent this claim is applicable with reference to the South African Constitution. Considering the historical context within which reproductive rights have emerged, this article concludes that the right to make decisions concerning reproduction (s 12(2)(a)) and the right to reproductive healthcare (s 27(1)(a)) both protect the freedom of individuals to form families by having children – including where this is done in non-traditional ways that do not involve the use of one’s own body.","PeriodicalId":44989,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal on Human Rights","volume":"36 1","pages":"1 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02587203.2020.1776632","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Something old, something new: applying reproductive rights to new reproductive technologies in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"B. Shozi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02587203.2020.1776632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract New reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilisation have opened up new avenues for those who wish to have children, and who need no longer be bound by biological limitations to procreation like infertility. However, the choices available to prospective parents have been restricted by the fact that the use of new reproductive technologies in artificial reproduction has been subject to regulation in many parts of the world – including South Africa. These regulations have been challenged on the grounds that they infringe upon the rights of those who want to use these technologies. Underlying these challenges is the claim that the rights which are currently given recognition in our law apply to the use of new reproductive technologies – and this article investigates to what extent this claim is applicable with reference to the South African Constitution. Considering the historical context within which reproductive rights have emerged, this article concludes that the right to make decisions concerning reproduction (s 12(2)(a)) and the right to reproductive healthcare (s 27(1)(a)) both protect the freedom of individuals to form families by having children – including where this is done in non-traditional ways that do not involve the use of one’s own body.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal on Human Rights\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02587203.2020.1776632\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal on Human Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2020.1776632\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2020.1776632","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

新的生殖技术,如体外受精,为那些希望有孩子的人开辟了新的途径,他们不再需要受到生物限制的束缚,如不孕不育。然而,由于在世界许多地方- -包括南非- -使用新的生殖技术进行人工生殖受到管制,未来父母的选择受到限制。这些规定受到质疑,理由是它们侵犯了那些想要使用这些技术的人的权利。这些挑战背后的主张是,目前在我国法律中得到承认的权利适用于使用新的生殖技术- -本文调查这一主张在何种程度上适用于《南非宪法》。考虑到生殖权利产生的历史背景,本条的结论是,关于生殖的决定权(第12(2)(a)条)和生殖保健权(第27(1)(a)条)都保护个人通过生育子女组成家庭的自由,包括以不涉及使用自己身体的非传统方式生育的自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Something old, something new: applying reproductive rights to new reproductive technologies in South Africa
Abstract New reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilisation have opened up new avenues for those who wish to have children, and who need no longer be bound by biological limitations to procreation like infertility. However, the choices available to prospective parents have been restricted by the fact that the use of new reproductive technologies in artificial reproduction has been subject to regulation in many parts of the world – including South Africa. These regulations have been challenged on the grounds that they infringe upon the rights of those who want to use these technologies. Underlying these challenges is the claim that the rights which are currently given recognition in our law apply to the use of new reproductive technologies – and this article investigates to what extent this claim is applicable with reference to the South African Constitution. Considering the historical context within which reproductive rights have emerged, this article concludes that the right to make decisions concerning reproduction (s 12(2)(a)) and the right to reproductive healthcare (s 27(1)(a)) both protect the freedom of individuals to form families by having children – including where this is done in non-traditional ways that do not involve the use of one’s own body.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
77.80%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Consulting citizens: Addressing the deficits in participatory democracy Ubuntu, human rights and sustainable development: Lessons from the African Arbitration Academy’s Model Bilateral Investment Treaty Research handbook on economic, social and cultural rights Augmentative and alternative communication in the South African justice system: Potential and pitfalls The importance of litigating the right to access sufficient food: Equal Education v Minister of Basic Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1