碳排放交易体系:对全球碳排放交易体系的回顾以及对中国碳排放交易体系的深入研究

IF 3.7 Q1 ECONOMICS China Economic Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1080/17538963.2023.2246714
Xianling Long, L. Goulder
{"title":"碳排放交易体系:对全球碳排放交易体系的回顾以及对中国碳排放交易体系的深入研究","authors":"Xianling Long, L. Goulder","doi":"10.1080/17538963.2023.2246714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A carbon emission trading system (ETS) is a market-based policy instrument to combat climate change. It internalizes the societal cost of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and thereby creates incentives for emission reductions through changes in production methods and levels of production as well as investments in low-carbon technologies. ETSs are an important and much-employed alternative to emissions taxes (such as a carbon tax) as an instrument for bringing about reductions in CO2 emissions. Under an emissions tax, the government sets the price of a unit of emissions – this is the tax rate – and the quantity of emissions is determined by the market, that is, by firms’ and consumers’ responses to the tax. In contrast, under an ETS, the government influences emissions through its decisions affecting the number of emissions allowances to be allocated to firms; the price of emissions is determined by the market, not directly by the government. A key feature of an ETS is the provision for allowance trading. If the market price of emissions allowances is below a firm’s marginal cost of reducing its emissions, a competitive firm will have an incentive to purchase additional allowances and thereby avoid some of the cost of reducing its emissions. The reverse is the case for a firm for which the market price of allowances is above its marginal cost of abatement. In the presence of allowance trading, the firm’s ultimate (end-of-period) allocation of allowances, plus (minus) any allowances it purchases (sells) on the trading market, must be at least enough to justify its emissions during the period. The price of allowances is an equilibrium outcome of the allowance supply and demand. Allowance trading helps reduce the economy-wide costs of achieving emissions reductions by bringing about more abatement by the facilities that can do so at lower cost.","PeriodicalId":45279,"journal":{"name":"China Economic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon emission trading systems: a review of systems across the globe and a close look at China’s national approach\",\"authors\":\"Xianling Long, L. Goulder\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17538963.2023.2246714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A carbon emission trading system (ETS) is a market-based policy instrument to combat climate change. It internalizes the societal cost of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and thereby creates incentives for emission reductions through changes in production methods and levels of production as well as investments in low-carbon technologies. ETSs are an important and much-employed alternative to emissions taxes (such as a carbon tax) as an instrument for bringing about reductions in CO2 emissions. Under an emissions tax, the government sets the price of a unit of emissions – this is the tax rate – and the quantity of emissions is determined by the market, that is, by firms’ and consumers’ responses to the tax. In contrast, under an ETS, the government influences emissions through its decisions affecting the number of emissions allowances to be allocated to firms; the price of emissions is determined by the market, not directly by the government. A key feature of an ETS is the provision for allowance trading. If the market price of emissions allowances is below a firm’s marginal cost of reducing its emissions, a competitive firm will have an incentive to purchase additional allowances and thereby avoid some of the cost of reducing its emissions. The reverse is the case for a firm for which the market price of allowances is above its marginal cost of abatement. In the presence of allowance trading, the firm’s ultimate (end-of-period) allocation of allowances, plus (minus) any allowances it purchases (sells) on the trading market, must be at least enough to justify its emissions during the period. The price of allowances is an equilibrium outcome of the allowance supply and demand. Allowance trading helps reduce the economy-wide costs of achieving emissions reductions by bringing about more abatement by the facilities that can do so at lower cost.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Economic Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Economic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2023.2246714\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2023.2246714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碳排放交易体系(ETS)是一种以市场为基础的应对气候变化的政策工具。它将二氧化碳排放的社会成本内部化,从而通过改变生产方法和生产水平以及对低碳技术的投资来激励减排。碳排放交易体系是排放税(如碳税)的重要替代方案,是减少二氧化碳排放的一种手段,被广泛采用。在排放税制度下,政府为单位排放量设定价格——这是税率——而排放量则由市场决定,也就是说,由企业和消费者对税收的反应决定。相反,在碳排放交易体系下,政府通过决定分配给企业的排放配额数量来影响排放;排放价格是由市场决定的,而不是直接由政府决定的。碳排放交易体系的一个主要特点是提供配额交易。如果排放配额的市场价格低于企业减少其排放的边际成本,竞争企业将有动力购买额外的配额,从而避免减少其排放的一些成本。如果一家公司的配额市场价格高于其减排的边际成本,情况则正好相反。在排放权交易的情况下,企业最终(期末)的排放权分配,加上(减去)它在交易市场上购买(出售)的任何排放权,必须至少足以证明其在该期间的排放量是合理的。配额价格是配额供需平衡的结果。配额交易有助于降低实现减排的经济范围内的成本,因为能够以较低成本做到这一点的设施可以带来更多的减排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Carbon emission trading systems: a review of systems across the globe and a close look at China’s national approach
A carbon emission trading system (ETS) is a market-based policy instrument to combat climate change. It internalizes the societal cost of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and thereby creates incentives for emission reductions through changes in production methods and levels of production as well as investments in low-carbon technologies. ETSs are an important and much-employed alternative to emissions taxes (such as a carbon tax) as an instrument for bringing about reductions in CO2 emissions. Under an emissions tax, the government sets the price of a unit of emissions – this is the tax rate – and the quantity of emissions is determined by the market, that is, by firms’ and consumers’ responses to the tax. In contrast, under an ETS, the government influences emissions through its decisions affecting the number of emissions allowances to be allocated to firms; the price of emissions is determined by the market, not directly by the government. A key feature of an ETS is the provision for allowance trading. If the market price of emissions allowances is below a firm’s marginal cost of reducing its emissions, a competitive firm will have an incentive to purchase additional allowances and thereby avoid some of the cost of reducing its emissions. The reverse is the case for a firm for which the market price of allowances is above its marginal cost of abatement. In the presence of allowance trading, the firm’s ultimate (end-of-period) allocation of allowances, plus (minus) any allowances it purchases (sells) on the trading market, must be at least enough to justify its emissions during the period. The price of allowances is an equilibrium outcome of the allowance supply and demand. Allowance trading helps reduce the economy-wide costs of achieving emissions reductions by bringing about more abatement by the facilities that can do so at lower cost.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Long-term effect of trade liberalization on human capital: evidence from Chinese students The institutional improvement effects of China’s foreign infrastructure investment and its mechanisms: implications for the construction of the belt and road initiative A decade of the belt and road initiative and its global impact Belt and Road countries’ external debt and China’s new strategies Financial sector development and industrialization: lessons and prospects for Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1