人性化而不是变革?联合国经济、社会和文化权利与经合组织国家经济不平等委员会2008-19

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2021-01-23 DOI:10.1093/lril/lraa020

Kári Ragnarsson

{"title":"人性化而不是变革?联合国经济、社会和文化权利与经合组织国家经济不平等委员会2008-19","authors":"Kári Ragnarsson","doi":"10.1093/lril/lraa020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n After leaving the issue mostly unaddressed, the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has in the last few years increasingly raised concerns about economic inequality, recommending progressive taxation to finance social spending. However, emphasising tax-and-transfer to ensure sufficient provision risks humanising and legitimising neoliberalism, leaving deeper structures untouched.","PeriodicalId":43782,"journal":{"name":"London Review of International Law","volume":"8 1","pages":"261-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/lril/lraa020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Humanising not transformative? The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and economic inequality in OECD countries 2008-19\",\"authors\":\"Kári Ragnarsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/lril/lraa020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n After leaving the issue mostly unaddressed, the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has in the last few years increasingly raised concerns about economic inequality, recommending progressive taxation to finance social spending. However, emphasising tax-and-transfer to ensure sufficient provision risks humanising and legitimising neoliberalism, leaving deeper structures untouched.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"London Review of International Law\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"261-286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/lril/lraa020\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"London Review of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lraa020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London Review of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lraa020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

联合国经济、社会和文化权利委员会(UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights)在过去几年里越来越多地提出了对经济不平等的担忧，建议通过累进税为社会支出提供资金。然而，强调税收和转移支付以确保充足的供应，可能会使新自由主义人性化和合法化，而不触及更深层次的结构。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Humanising not transformative? The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and economic inequality in OECD countries 2008-19

After leaving the issue mostly unaddressed, the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has in the last few years increasingly raised concerns about economic inequality, recommending progressive taxation to finance social spending. However, emphasising tax-and-transfer to ensure sufficient provision risks humanising and legitimising neoliberalism, leaving deeper structures untouched.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

London Review of International Law LAW-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量