Li-Jhen Chen, Ming‐Hsien Li, Hao-Wen Cheng, C. Kuo, Wei-Lun Sun, J. Tsai
{"title":"保留海马体的全脑放疗:非共面计划和共面计划的剂量学比较","authors":"Li-Jhen Chen, Ming‐Hsien Li, Hao-Wen Cheng, C. Kuo, Wei-Lun Sun, J. Tsai","doi":"10.21037/TRO-20-50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To compare non-coplanar and coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for hippocampal avoidance during whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) using the Elekta Synergy and Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) according to the suggested criteria of the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) 0933 trial. Methods: Nine patients who underwent WBRT were selected for this retrospective study. The hippocampus was contoured, and the hippocampal avoidance regions were created using a 5-mm volumetric expansion around the hippocampus for each patient. Non-coplanar and coplanar VMAT plans were generated for each patient. All treatment plans were generated for a prescribed dose (PD) of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Results: The average volumes of the hippocampus and hippocampal avoidance region were 2.8±0.38 and 27±2.48 cm 3 , respectively. For coplanar and non-coplanar VMAT plans, the average D 100% of the hippocampus was 8.60 Gy (range, 8.30–8.80 Gy) and 8.56 Gy (range, 8.30–8.90 Gy), respectively, and the average D max of the hippocampus was 15.29 Gy (range, 14.35–15.92 Gy) and 14.99 Gy (range, 13.80–15.83 Gy), respectively. The non-coplanar VMAT plans showed a significantly lower average D max of the lens (4.23 Gy) than did the coplanar VMAT plans (4.77 Gy). The average gamma passing rate for non-coplanar and coplanar VMAT quality assurance (QA) with criteria of 3%/3 mm were 95.4%±2.6% and 95.6%±1.6%, indicating good agreement between the calculated plan dose and the measured dose. Conclusions: We showed that the suggested criteria of the RTOG 0933 trial for the hippocampal dose can be achieved in both coplanar and non-planar VMAT plans. We performed VMAT QA for each treatment plan to verify the clinical","PeriodicalId":93236,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic radiology and oncology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hippocampus-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy: dosimetric comparison between non-coplanar and coplanar planning\",\"authors\":\"Li-Jhen Chen, Ming‐Hsien Li, Hao-Wen Cheng, C. Kuo, Wei-Lun Sun, J. Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/TRO-20-50\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: To compare non-coplanar and coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for hippocampal avoidance during whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) using the Elekta Synergy and Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) according to the suggested criteria of the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) 0933 trial. Methods: Nine patients who underwent WBRT were selected for this retrospective study. The hippocampus was contoured, and the hippocampal avoidance regions were created using a 5-mm volumetric expansion around the hippocampus for each patient. Non-coplanar and coplanar VMAT plans were generated for each patient. All treatment plans were generated for a prescribed dose (PD) of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Results: The average volumes of the hippocampus and hippocampal avoidance region were 2.8±0.38 and 27±2.48 cm 3 , respectively. For coplanar and non-coplanar VMAT plans, the average D 100% of the hippocampus was 8.60 Gy (range, 8.30–8.80 Gy) and 8.56 Gy (range, 8.30–8.90 Gy), respectively, and the average D max of the hippocampus was 15.29 Gy (range, 14.35–15.92 Gy) and 14.99 Gy (range, 13.80–15.83 Gy), respectively. The non-coplanar VMAT plans showed a significantly lower average D max of the lens (4.23 Gy) than did the coplanar VMAT plans (4.77 Gy). The average gamma passing rate for non-coplanar and coplanar VMAT quality assurance (QA) with criteria of 3%/3 mm were 95.4%±2.6% and 95.6%±1.6%, indicating good agreement between the calculated plan dose and the measured dose. Conclusions: We showed that the suggested criteria of the RTOG 0933 trial for the hippocampal dose can be achieved in both coplanar and non-planar VMAT plans. We performed VMAT QA for each treatment plan to verify the clinical\",\"PeriodicalId\":93236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic radiology and oncology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic radiology and oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/TRO-20-50\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic radiology and oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/TRO-20-50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:根据放射治疗肿瘤组(RTOG) 0933试验的建议标准,比较Elekta Synergy和Pinnacle治疗计划系统(TPS)在全脑放疗(HA-WBRT)期间海马回避的非共面和共面体积调制电弧治疗(VMAT)。方法:选择9例接受WBRT的患者进行回顾性研究。对每个患者的海马进行轮廓化处理,并在海马周围进行5毫米的体积扩张来创建海马回避区。为每位患者生成非共面和共面VMAT计划。所有的治疗方案都是按照30 Gy的处方剂量(PD)分成10份制定的。结果:海马和海马回避区平均体积分别为2.8±0.38 cm 3和27±2.48 cm 3。共面和非共面VMAT方案海马平均D 100%分别为8.60 Gy(范围,8.30-8.80 Gy)和8.56 Gy(范围,8.30-8.90 Gy),海马平均D max分别为15.29 Gy(范围,14.35-15.92 Gy)和14.99 Gy(范围,13.80-15.83 Gy)。非共面VMAT方案晶状体平均D max (4.23 Gy)明显低于共面VMAT方案(4.77 Gy)。以3%/3 mm为标准的非共面和共面VMAT质量保证(QA)的平均伽马通过率分别为95.4%±2.6%和95.6%±1.6%,表明计算的计划剂量与测量剂量吻合良好。结论:我们发现RTOG 0933试验建议的海马剂量标准在共平面和非平面VMAT计划中都可以达到。我们对每个治疗方案进行VMAT QA以验证临床效果
Hippocampus-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy: dosimetric comparison between non-coplanar and coplanar planning
Background: To compare non-coplanar and coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for hippocampal avoidance during whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) using the Elekta Synergy and Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) according to the suggested criteria of the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) 0933 trial. Methods: Nine patients who underwent WBRT were selected for this retrospective study. The hippocampus was contoured, and the hippocampal avoidance regions were created using a 5-mm volumetric expansion around the hippocampus for each patient. Non-coplanar and coplanar VMAT plans were generated for each patient. All treatment plans were generated for a prescribed dose (PD) of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Results: The average volumes of the hippocampus and hippocampal avoidance region were 2.8±0.38 and 27±2.48 cm 3 , respectively. For coplanar and non-coplanar VMAT plans, the average D 100% of the hippocampus was 8.60 Gy (range, 8.30–8.80 Gy) and 8.56 Gy (range, 8.30–8.90 Gy), respectively, and the average D max of the hippocampus was 15.29 Gy (range, 14.35–15.92 Gy) and 14.99 Gy (range, 13.80–15.83 Gy), respectively. The non-coplanar VMAT plans showed a significantly lower average D max of the lens (4.23 Gy) than did the coplanar VMAT plans (4.77 Gy). The average gamma passing rate for non-coplanar and coplanar VMAT quality assurance (QA) with criteria of 3%/3 mm were 95.4%±2.6% and 95.6%±1.6%, indicating good agreement between the calculated plan dose and the measured dose. Conclusions: We showed that the suggested criteria of the RTOG 0933 trial for the hippocampal dose can be achieved in both coplanar and non-planar VMAT plans. We performed VMAT QA for each treatment plan to verify the clinical