{"title":"破裂压力、泄漏试验和泊松比","authors":"R. Lahann, R. Swarbrick","doi":"10.1144/petgeo2021-103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fracture pressure models are used to create pre-drill fracture pressure/depth plots essential to the design of drilling and casing programs in oil and gas wells, and future development of carbon capture and underground storage. Some of these models include an empirical term (stress ratio) which relates effective horizontal stress to effective vertical stress. Based on the literature, stress ratio is assumed to vary with compaction and can be calculated from Poisson's ratio (ν). An alternative to models which utilize the stress ratio term is a model which relates fracture pressure to a constant fraction of the vertical stress. This paper demonstrates that a constant fraction of vertical stress is equivalent to a stress ratio which increases slightly with depth.Estimation of how the ν changes with compaction is complicated by the multiple methods which are commonly employed to measure ν. The available static and dynamic ν data suggest a substantial decrease in ν with porosity reduction. Evaluation of in situ ν data from leak-off tests (LOTS) and associated fluid pressure data in Tertiary Basins indicates that in situ ν does not decline as rapidly as indicated by the other methods of ν determination. In situ ν data indicate that calibration of stress ratio from traditional ν methods is not appropriate and may substantially underestimate fracture pressure (Fp).Fracture pressure models which utilize a constant fraction of vertical stress or estimate stress ratio empirically from LOT data should be employed for pre-drill estimation of fracture pressure.Thematic collection: This article is part of the Geopressure collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/geopressure","PeriodicalId":49704,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Geoscience","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fracture Pressure, Leak-Off Tests and Poisson's Ratio\",\"authors\":\"R. Lahann, R. Swarbrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1144/petgeo2021-103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fracture pressure models are used to create pre-drill fracture pressure/depth plots essential to the design of drilling and casing programs in oil and gas wells, and future development of carbon capture and underground storage. Some of these models include an empirical term (stress ratio) which relates effective horizontal stress to effective vertical stress. Based on the literature, stress ratio is assumed to vary with compaction and can be calculated from Poisson's ratio (ν). An alternative to models which utilize the stress ratio term is a model which relates fracture pressure to a constant fraction of the vertical stress. This paper demonstrates that a constant fraction of vertical stress is equivalent to a stress ratio which increases slightly with depth.Estimation of how the ν changes with compaction is complicated by the multiple methods which are commonly employed to measure ν. The available static and dynamic ν data suggest a substantial decrease in ν with porosity reduction. Evaluation of in situ ν data from leak-off tests (LOTS) and associated fluid pressure data in Tertiary Basins indicates that in situ ν does not decline as rapidly as indicated by the other methods of ν determination. In situ ν data indicate that calibration of stress ratio from traditional ν methods is not appropriate and may substantially underestimate fracture pressure (Fp).Fracture pressure models which utilize a constant fraction of vertical stress or estimate stress ratio empirically from LOT data should be employed for pre-drill estimation of fracture pressure.Thematic collection: This article is part of the Geopressure collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/geopressure\",\"PeriodicalId\":49704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petroleum Geoscience\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petroleum Geoscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2021-103\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Geoscience","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2021-103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fracture Pressure, Leak-Off Tests and Poisson's Ratio
Fracture pressure models are used to create pre-drill fracture pressure/depth plots essential to the design of drilling and casing programs in oil and gas wells, and future development of carbon capture and underground storage. Some of these models include an empirical term (stress ratio) which relates effective horizontal stress to effective vertical stress. Based on the literature, stress ratio is assumed to vary with compaction and can be calculated from Poisson's ratio (ν). An alternative to models which utilize the stress ratio term is a model which relates fracture pressure to a constant fraction of the vertical stress. This paper demonstrates that a constant fraction of vertical stress is equivalent to a stress ratio which increases slightly with depth.Estimation of how the ν changes with compaction is complicated by the multiple methods which are commonly employed to measure ν. The available static and dynamic ν data suggest a substantial decrease in ν with porosity reduction. Evaluation of in situ ν data from leak-off tests (LOTS) and associated fluid pressure data in Tertiary Basins indicates that in situ ν does not decline as rapidly as indicated by the other methods of ν determination. In situ ν data indicate that calibration of stress ratio from traditional ν methods is not appropriate and may substantially underestimate fracture pressure (Fp).Fracture pressure models which utilize a constant fraction of vertical stress or estimate stress ratio empirically from LOT data should be employed for pre-drill estimation of fracture pressure.Thematic collection: This article is part of the Geopressure collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/geopressure
期刊介绍:
Petroleum Geoscience is the international journal of geoenergy and applied earth science, and is co-owned by the Geological Society of London and the European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers (EAGE).
Petroleum Geoscience transcends disciplinary boundaries and publishes a balanced mix of articles covering exploration, exploitation, appraisal, development and enhancement of sub-surface hydrocarbon resources and carbon repositories. The integration of disciplines in an applied context, whether for fluid production, carbon storage or related geoenergy applications, is a particular strength of the journal. Articles on enhancing exploration efficiency, lowering technological and environmental risk, and improving hydrocarbon recovery communicate the latest developments in sub-surface geoscience to a wide readership.
Petroleum Geoscience provides a multidisciplinary forum for those engaged in the science and technology of the rock-related sub-surface disciplines. The journal reaches some 8000 individual subscribers, and a further 1100 institutional subscriptions provide global access to readers including geologists, geophysicists, petroleum and reservoir engineers, petrophysicists and geochemists in both academia and industry. The journal aims to share knowledge of reservoir geoscience and to reflect the international nature of its development.