罗伯特·弗罗斯特与“读眼者”

Q3 Arts and Humanities Anglica Pub Date : 2019-09-20 DOI:10.7311/0860-5734.28.1.08
Jeremy Pomeroy
{"title":"罗伯特·弗罗斯特与“读眼者”","authors":"Jeremy Pomeroy","doi":"10.7311/0860-5734.28.1.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One salient feature of Robert Frost’s aesthetics was his sharp diff erentiation of the visual from the audile imagination. Frost (a former schoolteacher) had noticed the diff erence between visual and audile/phonetic readers, and considered the eye reader to be a ‘bad’\nreader. The article examines those features of Frost’s own poetic practice which would have led him to consider the eye reader a bad reader, as well as the sorts of prosodic content an eye reader may be prone to miss. Having examined Frost’s aesthetic objections to the eye reader, the question is then posed: does Frost ever treat the “eye reader,” or oral\nversus visual predilections, thematically in his artistic writings?","PeriodicalId":36615,"journal":{"name":"Anglica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robert Frost and the “Eye Reader”\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy Pomeroy\",\"doi\":\"10.7311/0860-5734.28.1.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One salient feature of Robert Frost’s aesthetics was his sharp diff erentiation of the visual from the audile imagination. Frost (a former schoolteacher) had noticed the diff erence between visual and audile/phonetic readers, and considered the eye reader to be a ‘bad’\\nreader. The article examines those features of Frost’s own poetic practice which would have led him to consider the eye reader a bad reader, as well as the sorts of prosodic content an eye reader may be prone to miss. Having examined Frost’s aesthetic objections to the eye reader, the question is then posed: does Frost ever treat the “eye reader,” or oral\\nversus visual predilections, thematically in his artistic writings?\",\"PeriodicalId\":36615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anglica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anglica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7311/0860-5734.28.1.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anglica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7311/0860-5734.28.1.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

罗伯特·弗罗斯特美学的一个显著特征是他对视觉想象和听觉想象的鲜明区分。弗罗斯特(曾经是一名教师)注意到了视觉读者和听觉/语音读者之间的区别,并认为眼睛读者是一个“糟糕的”读者。这篇文章考察了弗罗斯特自己的诗歌实践的那些特征,这些特征可能会导致他认为读眼者是一个糟糕的读者,以及读眼者可能容易错过的韵律内容。在考察了弗罗斯特对读眼者的美学异议之后,接下来的问题是:弗罗斯特在他的艺术作品中是否曾以主题方式对待过“读眼者”,或者口头与视觉的偏好?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robert Frost and the “Eye Reader”
One salient feature of Robert Frost’s aesthetics was his sharp diff erentiation of the visual from the audile imagination. Frost (a former schoolteacher) had noticed the diff erence between visual and audile/phonetic readers, and considered the eye reader to be a ‘bad’ reader. The article examines those features of Frost’s own poetic practice which would have led him to consider the eye reader a bad reader, as well as the sorts of prosodic content an eye reader may be prone to miss. Having examined Frost’s aesthetic objections to the eye reader, the question is then posed: does Frost ever treat the “eye reader,” or oral versus visual predilections, thematically in his artistic writings?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anglica
Anglica Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reality as a Palimpsest: Information Disorder Practices in George Orwell’s 1984 and The Loudest Voice From the Teen Film to the Emerging Adult Film: The Road to Adulthood in Say Anything (1989) and High Fidelity (2000) Wok (‘work’) as a Melanesian Cultural Keyword: Exploring Semantic Insights from an Indigenous Tok Pisin Play The Status of English Modals Prior to Their Recategorization as T and the Trigger for Their Recategorization The Dynamics of Postnominal Adjectives in Middle English
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1