在减少危害和COVID-19的交叉点:人类学家在大流行期间和大流行后的作用

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Human Organization Pub Date : 2021-11-29 DOI:10.17730/1938-3525-80.4.272
Shana Harris, Allison Schlosser
{"title":"在减少危害和COVID-19的交叉点:人类学家在大流行期间和大流行后的作用","authors":"Shana Harris, Allison Schlosser","doi":"10.17730/1938-3525-80.4.272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Harm reduction is a public health approach that emphasizes reducing the negative effects of drug use rather than eliminating it. It has been practiced for decades; however, the COVID-19 pandemic poses new challenges for people who use drugs (PWUD) and harm reduction providers. In the United States, public health recommendations to curb the pandemic are complicating harm reduction efforts. Harm reduction programs are rethinking how they engage with PWUD to comply with these recommendations while also providing essential services. In this article, we draw on academic literature, news articles, and information distributed by harm reduction programs to discuss issues currently faced by PWUD and harm reduction providers across the country. This discussion focuses on policy changes and programming adaptations related to three harm reduction interventions—syringe services programs, overdose prevention, and medications for opioid use disorder—that have emerged or gained traction during the pandemic. We argue that anthropologists should play a key role in addressing the obstacles and opportunities for harm reduction in the United States during and post-pandemic. Ethnographic research can generate important knowledge of how pandemic-related service and policy changes are localized by providers and experienced by PWUD and uncover how race, class, and gender may shape access to and experiences with modified harm reduction services. Applied anthropologists also have an important role in collaborating with harm reduction programs to ensure that the voices of marginalized individuals are not ignored as policy and programming changes take place during and after the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":47620,"journal":{"name":"Human Organization","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"At the Intersection of Harm Reduction and COVID-19: The Role of Anthropologists during and Post-Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Shana Harris, Allison Schlosser\",\"doi\":\"10.17730/1938-3525-80.4.272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Harm reduction is a public health approach that emphasizes reducing the negative effects of drug use rather than eliminating it. It has been practiced for decades; however, the COVID-19 pandemic poses new challenges for people who use drugs (PWUD) and harm reduction providers. In the United States, public health recommendations to curb the pandemic are complicating harm reduction efforts. Harm reduction programs are rethinking how they engage with PWUD to comply with these recommendations while also providing essential services. In this article, we draw on academic literature, news articles, and information distributed by harm reduction programs to discuss issues currently faced by PWUD and harm reduction providers across the country. This discussion focuses on policy changes and programming adaptations related to three harm reduction interventions—syringe services programs, overdose prevention, and medications for opioid use disorder—that have emerged or gained traction during the pandemic. We argue that anthropologists should play a key role in addressing the obstacles and opportunities for harm reduction in the United States during and post-pandemic. Ethnographic research can generate important knowledge of how pandemic-related service and policy changes are localized by providers and experienced by PWUD and uncover how race, class, and gender may shape access to and experiences with modified harm reduction services. Applied anthropologists also have an important role in collaborating with harm reduction programs to ensure that the voices of marginalized individuals are not ignored as policy and programming changes take place during and after the pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Organization\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17730/1938-3525-80.4.272\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Organization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17730/1938-3525-80.4.272","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

减少危害是一种公共卫生方法,强调减少而不是消除药物使用的负面影响。它已经实践了几十年;然而,新冠肺炎大流行给吸毒者和减少伤害提供者带来了新的挑战。在美国,遏制疫情的公共卫生建议使减少危害的工作变得复杂。减少危害项目正在重新思考如何与PWUD合作,以遵守这些建议,同时提供基本服务。在这篇文章中,我们利用学术文献、新闻文章和减少伤害项目分发的信息,讨论PWUD和全国各地减少伤害提供者目前面临的问题。这场讨论的重点是与三种减少伤害干预措施相关的政策变化和程序调整——注射器服务计划、过量预防和阿片类药物使用障碍药物——这些干预措施在疫情期间出现或获得了支持。我们认为,人类学家应该在解决疫情期间和疫情后美国减少伤害的障碍和机会方面发挥关键作用。民族志研究可以产生重要的知识,了解提供者如何本地化与疫情相关的服务和政策变化,PWUD如何体验这些变化,并揭示种族、阶级和性别如何影响获得改良的减少伤害服务的机会和体验。应用人类学家在与减少伤害计划合作方面也发挥着重要作用,以确保在疫情期间和之后发生政策和计划变化时,边缘化个人的声音不会被忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
At the Intersection of Harm Reduction and COVID-19: The Role of Anthropologists during and Post-Pandemic
Harm reduction is a public health approach that emphasizes reducing the negative effects of drug use rather than eliminating it. It has been practiced for decades; however, the COVID-19 pandemic poses new challenges for people who use drugs (PWUD) and harm reduction providers. In the United States, public health recommendations to curb the pandemic are complicating harm reduction efforts. Harm reduction programs are rethinking how they engage with PWUD to comply with these recommendations while also providing essential services. In this article, we draw on academic literature, news articles, and information distributed by harm reduction programs to discuss issues currently faced by PWUD and harm reduction providers across the country. This discussion focuses on policy changes and programming adaptations related to three harm reduction interventions—syringe services programs, overdose prevention, and medications for opioid use disorder—that have emerged or gained traction during the pandemic. We argue that anthropologists should play a key role in addressing the obstacles and opportunities for harm reduction in the United States during and post-pandemic. Ethnographic research can generate important knowledge of how pandemic-related service and policy changes are localized by providers and experienced by PWUD and uncover how race, class, and gender may shape access to and experiences with modified harm reduction services. Applied anthropologists also have an important role in collaborating with harm reduction programs to ensure that the voices of marginalized individuals are not ignored as policy and programming changes take place during and after the pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Organization
Human Organization Multiple-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Controlled to uncontrolled drug use: The impact of Covid-19 among young people in the UK. Sensing, knowing, and making water quality along Marikina River in the Philippines. EMBODYING THE EVERYDAY: HEALTH AND HERITAGE PRACTICE RELATIONSHIPS IN LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN IMMIGRANT COMMUNITIES IN NEW YORK CITY FOUNDERS ENDOWMENT CONTRIBUTIONS CONSUMER GENETICS: WHAT ABOUT INFORMED CONSENT?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1