根据利益相关者的反馈建立OER计划

IF 1.3 4区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Reference Services Review Pub Date : 2020-10-15 DOI:10.1108/rsr-03-2020-0013
Marisa Petrich
{"title":"根据利益相关者的反馈建立OER计划","authors":"Marisa Petrich","doi":"10.1108/rsr-03-2020-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to outline a library-led open educational resource (OER) training program for faculty and an assessment of barriers to OER adoption on campus. This study examines program assessment data (including faculty-reported needs to increase the likelihood of OER adoption) and analyzes a community-focused outreach strategy for a new OER program.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis program took a user-centered approach to developing campus support services for OER that specifically sought to address local needs and challenges. It intentionally incorporated strategies related to faculty motivation and satisfaction.\n\n\nFindings\nAlthough this faculty incentive program did not require OER adoption, a high number of voluntary OER adoptions occurred and participants showed interest in sharing information about OER across campus. Information about barriers to adoption informed future services.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis paper presents an adaptable model to launch new OER services and encourage a culture of using affordable course materials.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis project gathered information and identified collaborators to help build a sustainable, community-oriented OER program. The program focused early efforts on collecting and incorporating stakeholder feedback rather than moving directly to strategies focused on adopting or creating OER. It offers a model for other libraries to follow in creating sustainable practices.\n","PeriodicalId":46478,"journal":{"name":"Reference Services Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/rsr-03-2020-0013","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building an OER program based on stakeholder feedback\",\"authors\":\"Marisa Petrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/rsr-03-2020-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to outline a library-led open educational resource (OER) training program for faculty and an assessment of barriers to OER adoption on campus. This study examines program assessment data (including faculty-reported needs to increase the likelihood of OER adoption) and analyzes a community-focused outreach strategy for a new OER program.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis program took a user-centered approach to developing campus support services for OER that specifically sought to address local needs and challenges. It intentionally incorporated strategies related to faculty motivation and satisfaction.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nAlthough this faculty incentive program did not require OER adoption, a high number of voluntary OER adoptions occurred and participants showed interest in sharing information about OER across campus. Information about barriers to adoption informed future services.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis paper presents an adaptable model to launch new OER services and encourage a culture of using affordable course materials.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis project gathered information and identified collaborators to help build a sustainable, community-oriented OER program. The program focused early efforts on collecting and incorporating stakeholder feedback rather than moving directly to strategies focused on adopting or creating OER. It offers a model for other libraries to follow in creating sustainable practices.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reference Services Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/rsr-03-2020-0013\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reference Services Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/rsr-03-2020-0013\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reference Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rsr-03-2020-0013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的本研究旨在概述一个以图书馆为主导的教师开放教育资源(OER)培训计划,并评估在校园内采用OER的障碍。本研究检查了项目评估数据(包括教师报告的增加OER采用可能性的需求),并分析了新OER项目的以社区为中心的外联策略。设计/方法论/方法该项目采用以用户为中心的方法为OER开发校园支持服务,专门寻求解决当地需求和挑战。它有意纳入与教师动机和满意度相关的策略。发现尽管这项教师激励计划不要求采用OER,但仍有大量自愿采用OER的情况发生,参与者对在校园内分享有关OER的信息表现出了兴趣。关于采用障碍的信息为未来的服务提供了信息。实践意义本文提出了一个适应性强的模式来推出新的OER服务,并鼓励使用负担得起的课程材料的文化。创意/价值该项目收集信息并确定合作者,以帮助建立一个可持续的、面向社区的OER计划。该计划的早期工作重点是收集和整合利益相关者的反馈,而不是直接转向专注于采用或创建OER的战略。它为其他图书馆提供了一个创建可持续实践的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Building an OER program based on stakeholder feedback
Purpose This study aims to outline a library-led open educational resource (OER) training program for faculty and an assessment of barriers to OER adoption on campus. This study examines program assessment data (including faculty-reported needs to increase the likelihood of OER adoption) and analyzes a community-focused outreach strategy for a new OER program. Design/methodology/approach This program took a user-centered approach to developing campus support services for OER that specifically sought to address local needs and challenges. It intentionally incorporated strategies related to faculty motivation and satisfaction. Findings Although this faculty incentive program did not require OER adoption, a high number of voluntary OER adoptions occurred and participants showed interest in sharing information about OER across campus. Information about barriers to adoption informed future services. Practical implications This paper presents an adaptable model to launch new OER services and encourage a culture of using affordable course materials. Originality/value This project gathered information and identified collaborators to help build a sustainable, community-oriented OER program. The program focused early efforts on collecting and incorporating stakeholder feedback rather than moving directly to strategies focused on adopting or creating OER. It offers a model for other libraries to follow in creating sustainable practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reference Services Review
Reference Services Review INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Reference Services Review (RSR ) is a quarterly, refereed journal dedicated to the enrichment of reference knowledge and the advancement of reference services. RSR covers all aspects of reference functions, including automation of reference services, evaluation and assessment of reference functions and sources, models for delivering quality reference services in all types and sizes of libraries, development and management of teaching/learning activities, promotion of information literacy programs, and partnerships with other entities to achieve reference goals and objectives. RSR prepares its readers to understand and embrace current and emerging technologies affecting reference functions, instructional services and information needs of library users.
期刊最新文献
Onboarding for liaison librarians: building community and practice Campus entrepreneurs’ research habits and needs: a five-year study Affective dimensions of academic librarians’ experiences during the Covid-19 pandemic: experiences and lessons learned for information literacy The framing of authority in the ACRL framework on information literacy: multidisciplinary perspectives on truth, authority, expertise and belief Starting in-house copyright education programs: commonalities and conclusions from two southeastern US academic libraries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1