诊所如何创造性别:一个转变观念的医学史

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews Pub Date : 2023-08-24 DOI:10.1177/00943061231191421k
S. Shuster
{"title":"诊所如何创造性别:一个转变观念的医学史","authors":"S. Shuster","doi":"10.1177/00943061231191421k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the perspectives of Crossroads teachers, Chapter Four showcases Pinnacle’s Korean parents and students as they engage in the institutionalization of ethnic capital by sharing and enhancing ethnic-based community resources and opportunities within Pinnacle. For instance, Korean parents host extravagant teacher appreciation and education events through the Korean Parent Teacher Association (KPTA)—a separate organization from the general PTA. These events are intended to educate teachers about Korean ‘‘culture’’ and ‘‘values’’ and signal Korean parents’ deep devotion to their children’s achievement, implicitly helping Korean children to receive extra classroom attention and the benefit of the doubt, such as when facing discipline at Pinnacle. Given that Chapter Four comes directly after Drake’s discussion of the criminalization of Black and Latinx Crossroads students and segregated teaching and learning environments in Chapters Two and Three, we wondered how school officials reproduce and respond to the institutionalization of ethnic capital, which could further support the racialization of academic achievement across the two schools. Drake’s final empirical chapter begins with a conversation with one of Crossroads’ assistant principals discussing how the administration and the district have missed opportunities to effectively help students meet their learning, social, and emotional needs. Though Crossroads did present some opportunities for gainful employment after graduation (e.g., a job fair with local Armed Forces recruiters, professional schools, and academies), these opportunities were sparse. Drake also underscores some of Pinnacle’s limitations by highlighting its lack of support for its students of color and exemplifying a crucial need to do more to advance students that do not fit into Pinnacle’s success framework. To conclude, Drake presents some actionable steps toward equity that revolve around credit recovery programs within comprehensive schools. Though imperfect, this would create a less marginalized and stratified schooling experience. Overall, Academic Apartheid highlights the academic segregation and racial and socioeconomic inequalities that persist within a high-achieving and well-resourced suburban district. Useful for sociology of education scholars, instructors, and students, as well as teachers and administrators overseeing school curriculum, practices, and policies, this book serves as a glaring representation of how institutional strategies promoting hyper-competition and hyperacademic success can fail the most vulnerable students. Drake peels back the layers of racial and socioeconomic stratification that exist in this well-resourced school district to shine light on both within-school and between-school disparities that disproportionately affect the educational opportunities of Black, Latinx, and low-income students. In doing this, Drake opens the door for critical intersectionality work within the developing research area of suburban schooling experiences.","PeriodicalId":46889,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How the Clinic Made Gender: The Medical History of a Transformative Idea\",\"authors\":\"S. Shuster\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00943061231191421k\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"the perspectives of Crossroads teachers, Chapter Four showcases Pinnacle’s Korean parents and students as they engage in the institutionalization of ethnic capital by sharing and enhancing ethnic-based community resources and opportunities within Pinnacle. For instance, Korean parents host extravagant teacher appreciation and education events through the Korean Parent Teacher Association (KPTA)—a separate organization from the general PTA. These events are intended to educate teachers about Korean ‘‘culture’’ and ‘‘values’’ and signal Korean parents’ deep devotion to their children’s achievement, implicitly helping Korean children to receive extra classroom attention and the benefit of the doubt, such as when facing discipline at Pinnacle. Given that Chapter Four comes directly after Drake’s discussion of the criminalization of Black and Latinx Crossroads students and segregated teaching and learning environments in Chapters Two and Three, we wondered how school officials reproduce and respond to the institutionalization of ethnic capital, which could further support the racialization of academic achievement across the two schools. Drake’s final empirical chapter begins with a conversation with one of Crossroads’ assistant principals discussing how the administration and the district have missed opportunities to effectively help students meet their learning, social, and emotional needs. Though Crossroads did present some opportunities for gainful employment after graduation (e.g., a job fair with local Armed Forces recruiters, professional schools, and academies), these opportunities were sparse. Drake also underscores some of Pinnacle’s limitations by highlighting its lack of support for its students of color and exemplifying a crucial need to do more to advance students that do not fit into Pinnacle’s success framework. To conclude, Drake presents some actionable steps toward equity that revolve around credit recovery programs within comprehensive schools. Though imperfect, this would create a less marginalized and stratified schooling experience. Overall, Academic Apartheid highlights the academic segregation and racial and socioeconomic inequalities that persist within a high-achieving and well-resourced suburban district. Useful for sociology of education scholars, instructors, and students, as well as teachers and administrators overseeing school curriculum, practices, and policies, this book serves as a glaring representation of how institutional strategies promoting hyper-competition and hyperacademic success can fail the most vulnerable students. Drake peels back the layers of racial and socioeconomic stratification that exist in this well-resourced school district to shine light on both within-school and between-school disparities that disproportionately affect the educational opportunities of Black, Latinx, and low-income students. In doing this, Drake opens the door for critical intersectionality work within the developing research area of suburban schooling experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00943061231191421k\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00943061231191421k","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Crossroads教师的视角,第四章展示了Pinnacle的韩国家长和学生通过分享和加强Pinnacle内基于种族的社区资源和机会,参与种族资本的制度化。例如,韩国家长通过韩国家长教师协会(KPTA)举办奢华的教师欣赏和教育活动,该协会是一个独立于普通家长教师协会的组织。这些活动旨在教育教师了解韩国的“文化”和“价值观”,并表明韩国父母对孩子的成就有着深深的投入,含蓄地帮助韩国孩子在课堂上获得额外的关注,并从怀疑中受益,比如在Pinnacle面对纪律时。鉴于第四章直接出现在德雷克在第二章和第三章中讨论了黑人和拉丁裔十字路口学生的刑事定罪以及隔离的教学和学习环境之后,我们想知道学校官员如何复制和应对种族资本的制度化,这可能会进一步支持这两所学校对学业成绩的种族化。德雷克的最后一章以与Crossroads的一位助理校长的对话开始,讨论政府和学区如何错过了有效帮助学生满足学习、社交和情感需求的机会。尽管Crossroads确实在毕业后提供了一些有报酬的就业机会(例如,与当地武装部队招聘人员、专业学校和学院举行的招聘会),但这些机会很少。Drake还强调了Pinnacle的一些局限性,强调了其缺乏对有色人种学生的支持,并举例说明了迫切需要做更多的工作来培养不符合Pinnacle成功框架的学生。最后,德雷克提出了一些可行的公平措施,这些措施围绕着综合学校的信用恢复计划展开。尽管不完美,但这将创造一种不那么边缘化和分层的教育体验。总的来说,学术种族隔离突出了学术隔离以及种族和社会经济不平等,这些不平等在一个成绩斐然、资源充足的郊区持续存在。这本书对教育社会学学者、教师和学生,以及监督学校课程、实践和政策的教师和管理人员都很有用,它鲜明地展示了促进超竞争和超学术成功的制度策略如何让最弱势的学生失望。德雷克剥离了这个资源充足的学区中存在的种族和社会经济分层,揭示了学校内部和学校之间的差异,这些差异不成比例地影响了黑人、拉丁裔和低收入学生的教育机会。在这样做的过程中,德雷克为郊区教育体验发展研究领域的关键交叉性工作打开了大门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How the Clinic Made Gender: The Medical History of a Transformative Idea
the perspectives of Crossroads teachers, Chapter Four showcases Pinnacle’s Korean parents and students as they engage in the institutionalization of ethnic capital by sharing and enhancing ethnic-based community resources and opportunities within Pinnacle. For instance, Korean parents host extravagant teacher appreciation and education events through the Korean Parent Teacher Association (KPTA)—a separate organization from the general PTA. These events are intended to educate teachers about Korean ‘‘culture’’ and ‘‘values’’ and signal Korean parents’ deep devotion to their children’s achievement, implicitly helping Korean children to receive extra classroom attention and the benefit of the doubt, such as when facing discipline at Pinnacle. Given that Chapter Four comes directly after Drake’s discussion of the criminalization of Black and Latinx Crossroads students and segregated teaching and learning environments in Chapters Two and Three, we wondered how school officials reproduce and respond to the institutionalization of ethnic capital, which could further support the racialization of academic achievement across the two schools. Drake’s final empirical chapter begins with a conversation with one of Crossroads’ assistant principals discussing how the administration and the district have missed opportunities to effectively help students meet their learning, social, and emotional needs. Though Crossroads did present some opportunities for gainful employment after graduation (e.g., a job fair with local Armed Forces recruiters, professional schools, and academies), these opportunities were sparse. Drake also underscores some of Pinnacle’s limitations by highlighting its lack of support for its students of color and exemplifying a crucial need to do more to advance students that do not fit into Pinnacle’s success framework. To conclude, Drake presents some actionable steps toward equity that revolve around credit recovery programs within comprehensive schools. Though imperfect, this would create a less marginalized and stratified schooling experience. Overall, Academic Apartheid highlights the academic segregation and racial and socioeconomic inequalities that persist within a high-achieving and well-resourced suburban district. Useful for sociology of education scholars, instructors, and students, as well as teachers and administrators overseeing school curriculum, practices, and policies, this book serves as a glaring representation of how institutional strategies promoting hyper-competition and hyperacademic success can fail the most vulnerable students. Drake peels back the layers of racial and socioeconomic stratification that exist in this well-resourced school district to shine light on both within-school and between-school disparities that disproportionately affect the educational opportunities of Black, Latinx, and low-income students. In doing this, Drake opens the door for critical intersectionality work within the developing research area of suburban schooling experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
期刊最新文献
How the Clinic Made Gender: The Medical History of a Transformative Idea Prisons of Debt: The Afterlives of Incarcerated Fathers Working-Class Kids Photographing Childhood: Valuing Care, Reciprocity, Sociality, and Dignity Literature in the Dawn of Sociological Theory: Stories That Are Telling On Expertise: Cultivating Character, Goodwill, and Practical Wisdom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1