{"title":"吝啬的股权?:讨论公平:良心走向市场","authors":"Samuel L. Bray","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3289735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay, forthcoming in the Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, analyzes Irit Samet's book \"Equity: Conscience Goes to Market\" (2018). It offers praise for Samet's illumination of conscience in equity, while also raising several critical questions. In particular, this essay argues that Samet offers a too minimal equity, which in her account is distinguished from law only by the centrality of conscience and the profusion of standards. The essay concludes with three questions: what of equity's dangers? do the social and institutional conditions exist for a thick morality in equity? and is Samet offering an internal or external perspective on equity?","PeriodicalId":36820,"journal":{"name":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Parsimonious Equity?: Discussion of Equity: Conscience Goes to Market\",\"authors\":\"Samuel L. Bray\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3289735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay, forthcoming in the Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, analyzes Irit Samet's book \\\"Equity: Conscience Goes to Market\\\" (2018). It offers praise for Samet's illumination of conscience in equity, while also raising several critical questions. In particular, this essay argues that Samet offers a too minimal equity, which in her account is distinguished from law only by the centrality of conscience and the profusion of standards. The essay concludes with three questions: what of equity's dangers? do the social and institutional conditions exist for a thick morality in equity? and is Samet offering an internal or external perspective on equity?\",\"PeriodicalId\":36820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3289735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3289735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Parsimonious Equity?: Discussion of Equity: Conscience Goes to Market
This essay, forthcoming in the Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, analyzes Irit Samet's book "Equity: Conscience Goes to Market" (2018). It offers praise for Samet's illumination of conscience in equity, while also raising several critical questions. In particular, this essay argues that Samet offers a too minimal equity, which in her account is distinguished from law only by the centrality of conscience and the profusion of standards. The essay concludes with three questions: what of equity's dangers? do the social and institutional conditions exist for a thick morality in equity? and is Samet offering an internal or external perspective on equity?
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
