{"title":"的东西。阿姆斯特丹南北地铁线的考古发现目录","authors":"M. Poulain","doi":"10.1080/00794236.2019.1659652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"odological approaches and the range of sources used makes this an appealing volume for those developing an interest in the archaeological and historical study of buildings, as well as for those with more than a passing interest. If your definition of archaeology, when it comes to buildings, only includes the fabric of those still standing (Trow 2018), this volume will highlight the need to study buildings holistically to approach their multiple and conflicting meanings. If, however, your definition also takes into account excavated material, relationship to landscape and documentary research to investigate and reconstruct how buildings were built, developed and experienced over time (see Green & Dixon 2016), you may be left wondering, like this reviewer, whether building history is a necessary term or whether it will further muddy the water as to what is and is not considered buildings archaeology. While appreciating that this volume was the result of an interdisciplinary conference, intent on creating a joined-up approach to the study of buildings across disciplines, the lack of reference to the archaeology of buildings/buildings archaeology, particularly in the editors’ introduction or Gardiner’s introductory chapter, does seem rather an omission.","PeriodicalId":43560,"journal":{"name":"Post-Medieval Archaeology","volume":"53 1","pages":"441 - 442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00794236.2019.1659652","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stuff. Catalogue of Archaeological Finds from Amsterdam’s North/South Metro Line\",\"authors\":\"M. Poulain\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00794236.2019.1659652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"odological approaches and the range of sources used makes this an appealing volume for those developing an interest in the archaeological and historical study of buildings, as well as for those with more than a passing interest. If your definition of archaeology, when it comes to buildings, only includes the fabric of those still standing (Trow 2018), this volume will highlight the need to study buildings holistically to approach their multiple and conflicting meanings. If, however, your definition also takes into account excavated material, relationship to landscape and documentary research to investigate and reconstruct how buildings were built, developed and experienced over time (see Green & Dixon 2016), you may be left wondering, like this reviewer, whether building history is a necessary term or whether it will further muddy the water as to what is and is not considered buildings archaeology. While appreciating that this volume was the result of an interdisciplinary conference, intent on creating a joined-up approach to the study of buildings across disciplines, the lack of reference to the archaeology of buildings/buildings archaeology, particularly in the editors’ introduction or Gardiner’s introductory chapter, does seem rather an omission.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Post-Medieval Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"441 - 442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00794236.2019.1659652\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Post-Medieval Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00794236.2019.1659652\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Post-Medieval Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00794236.2019.1659652","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stuff. Catalogue of Archaeological Finds from Amsterdam’s North/South Metro Line
odological approaches and the range of sources used makes this an appealing volume for those developing an interest in the archaeological and historical study of buildings, as well as for those with more than a passing interest. If your definition of archaeology, when it comes to buildings, only includes the fabric of those still standing (Trow 2018), this volume will highlight the need to study buildings holistically to approach their multiple and conflicting meanings. If, however, your definition also takes into account excavated material, relationship to landscape and documentary research to investigate and reconstruct how buildings were built, developed and experienced over time (see Green & Dixon 2016), you may be left wondering, like this reviewer, whether building history is a necessary term or whether it will further muddy the water as to what is and is not considered buildings archaeology. While appreciating that this volume was the result of an interdisciplinary conference, intent on creating a joined-up approach to the study of buildings across disciplines, the lack of reference to the archaeology of buildings/buildings archaeology, particularly in the editors’ introduction or Gardiner’s introductory chapter, does seem rather an omission.