{"title":"从组织学习和知识获取到学习型组织:欧盟委员会通过DG DEVCO的案例","authors":"Ileana Daniela Serban","doi":"10.1080/23745118.2021.1953308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The current article looks at types of organisational learning and connects them with knowledge acquisition processes and governance arrangements. Conceptually, it contributes by placing organisational learning within the broader context of knowledge production and governance. Moreover, it questions the learning organisation concept by showing that depending on the type of organisational learning, we may witness or not the emergence of learning organisations. Empirically, the analysis proceeds by applying the proposed theoretical lenses to the case of the European Commission’s learning journey, and more specifically to the case of the Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development (DG DEVCO). While accounting for the evolution of DG DEVCO towards an evidence-based organisation and the still missing elements for becoming a learning organisation, the analysis shows that learning organisation as an institutional label should be used carefully and applied only when specific organisational learning sources are used, in relation to specific processes of knowledge acquisition and governance arrangements.","PeriodicalId":53479,"journal":{"name":"European Politics and Society","volume":"23 1","pages":"754 - 771"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23745118.2021.1953308","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From organisational learning and knowledge acquisition to the learning organisation: the case of the European Commission through DG DEVCO\",\"authors\":\"Ileana Daniela Serban\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23745118.2021.1953308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The current article looks at types of organisational learning and connects them with knowledge acquisition processes and governance arrangements. Conceptually, it contributes by placing organisational learning within the broader context of knowledge production and governance. Moreover, it questions the learning organisation concept by showing that depending on the type of organisational learning, we may witness or not the emergence of learning organisations. Empirically, the analysis proceeds by applying the proposed theoretical lenses to the case of the European Commission’s learning journey, and more specifically to the case of the Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development (DG DEVCO). While accounting for the evolution of DG DEVCO towards an evidence-based organisation and the still missing elements for becoming a learning organisation, the analysis shows that learning organisation as an institutional label should be used carefully and applied only when specific organisational learning sources are used, in relation to specific processes of knowledge acquisition and governance arrangements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Politics and Society\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"754 - 771\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23745118.2021.1953308\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Politics and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2021.1953308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Politics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2021.1953308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
From organisational learning and knowledge acquisition to the learning organisation: the case of the European Commission through DG DEVCO
ABSTRACT The current article looks at types of organisational learning and connects them with knowledge acquisition processes and governance arrangements. Conceptually, it contributes by placing organisational learning within the broader context of knowledge production and governance. Moreover, it questions the learning organisation concept by showing that depending on the type of organisational learning, we may witness or not the emergence of learning organisations. Empirically, the analysis proceeds by applying the proposed theoretical lenses to the case of the European Commission’s learning journey, and more specifically to the case of the Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development (DG DEVCO). While accounting for the evolution of DG DEVCO towards an evidence-based organisation and the still missing elements for becoming a learning organisation, the analysis shows that learning organisation as an institutional label should be used carefully and applied only when specific organisational learning sources are used, in relation to specific processes of knowledge acquisition and governance arrangements.
期刊介绍:
The editors of European Politics and Society welcome the submission of high quality articles on all aspects of European Politics, widely defined to include, comparative politics, political sociology, social policy, international relations, security, and modern history. The geographical scope of the journal covers all parts of Europe including the Russian Federation. The Journal also welcomes proposals for special thematic issues. For further guidelines on submission of special issue proposals, please see the Instructions for Authors page. All articles will be subject to a rigorous double-blind peer review process by a minimum of two referees.