透过镜子,以及代数在那里发现的东西:代数代换和高斯消去的历史意义上的概念隐喻

Melinda Lanius
{"title":"透过镜子,以及代数在那里发现的东西:代数代换和高斯消去的历史意义上的概念隐喻","authors":"Melinda Lanius","doi":"10.1080/26375451.2023.2215650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fostering students' relational understanding of the equals sign is a challenge for math educators that begins in the primary levels and persists into tertiary education. In this paper, I develop an entry point, especially for students who only have an operational understanding of the equals sign, to the core idea of equivalence in linear algebra. My approach is informed by the history of mathematics: In the 17th and 18th centuries, mathematics research underwent an algebraicization, with mathematicians replacing their classical geometric questions with novel algebraic investigations. In this paper, I will offer geometric interpretations of two operations developed at the precipice of this monumental shift: algebraic substitution and Gaussian elimination. I will then utilize Lakoff & Johnson's theory of conceptual metaphor to compare and contrast this historically-grounded geometric re-interpretation of modern linear algebra to the direct algebraic interpretation taken in most modern textbooks.","PeriodicalId":36683,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Mathematics","volume":"38 1","pages":"141 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Through the looking glass, and what algebra found there: historically informed conceptual metaphors of algebraic substitution and Gaussian elimination\",\"authors\":\"Melinda Lanius\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26375451.2023.2215650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fostering students' relational understanding of the equals sign is a challenge for math educators that begins in the primary levels and persists into tertiary education. In this paper, I develop an entry point, especially for students who only have an operational understanding of the equals sign, to the core idea of equivalence in linear algebra. My approach is informed by the history of mathematics: In the 17th and 18th centuries, mathematics research underwent an algebraicization, with mathematicians replacing their classical geometric questions with novel algebraic investigations. In this paper, I will offer geometric interpretations of two operations developed at the precipice of this monumental shift: algebraic substitution and Gaussian elimination. I will then utilize Lakoff & Johnson's theory of conceptual metaphor to compare and contrast this historically-grounded geometric re-interpretation of modern linear algebra to the direct algebraic interpretation taken in most modern textbooks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal for the History of Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"141 - 157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal for the History of Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26375451.2023.2215650\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal for the History of Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26375451.2023.2215650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

培养学生对等号的关系理解对数学教育者来说是一个挑战,从小学阶段开始,一直持续到高等教育。在本文中,我开发了一个切入点,特别是对于那些只对等号有一个操作性理解的学生,在线性代数中等效的核心思想。我的方法受到数学历史的影响:在17世纪和18世纪,数学研究经历了代数化,数学家们用新的代数研究取代了经典的几何问题。在本文中,我将提供在这个巨大转变的悬崖上发展起来的两个操作的几何解释:代数代换和高斯消去。然后,我将利用Lakoff & Johnson的概念隐喻理论,将这种基于历史的现代线性代数的几何重新解释与大多数现代教科书中采用的直接代数解释进行比较和对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Through the looking glass, and what algebra found there: historically informed conceptual metaphors of algebraic substitution and Gaussian elimination
Fostering students' relational understanding of the equals sign is a challenge for math educators that begins in the primary levels and persists into tertiary education. In this paper, I develop an entry point, especially for students who only have an operational understanding of the equals sign, to the core idea of equivalence in linear algebra. My approach is informed by the history of mathematics: In the 17th and 18th centuries, mathematics research underwent an algebraicization, with mathematicians replacing their classical geometric questions with novel algebraic investigations. In this paper, I will offer geometric interpretations of two operations developed at the precipice of this monumental shift: algebraic substitution and Gaussian elimination. I will then utilize Lakoff & Johnson's theory of conceptual metaphor to compare and contrast this historically-grounded geometric re-interpretation of modern linear algebra to the direct algebraic interpretation taken in most modern textbooks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal for the History of Mathematics
British Journal for the History of Mathematics Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
The Loterias Lisbonenses of Francisco Giraldes Barba Thomas Simpson and Dido’s problem Graph theory in America: the first hundred years Mesopotamian square root approximation by a sequence of rectangles Through the looking glass, and what algebra found there: historically informed conceptual metaphors of algebraic substitution and Gaussian elimination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1