基质类型对新生木响尾蛇气味追踪行为的影响

IF 2.6 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Copeia Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1643/CE-19-274
C. Howey, Erika M. Snyder
{"title":"基质类型对新生木响尾蛇气味追踪行为的影响","authors":"C. Howey, Erika M. Snyder","doi":"10.1643/CE-19-274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Animals can obtain social information from monitoring chemical cues in their environment left behind by conspecifics, competitors, predators, or prey. Whereas many studies have addressed the ability of snakes to trail scents in the laboratory along a homogeneous substrate (i.e., butcher paper), our objective was to determine if the scent-trailing behavior of a snake was affected by changes in substrate type (paper, sand, leaf litter, and burnt leaf litter). We brought five pregnant Timber Rattlesnakes (Crotalus horridus) into the laboratory where each gave birth to an average of nine newborns. After each newborn shed, we conducted Y-maze trials. The scent of the mother was applied down one arm of the Y-maze. Each newborn was tested on each substrate. Newborns non-randomly chose the arm with the mother's scent 87% of the time when tested on paper (P < 0.001) and 73% of the time when tested on sand (P = 0.011). When tested on leaf litter and burnt leaf litter, newborns chose the arm with the mother's scent 67% and 53% of the time (P = 0.068 and P = 0.715, respectively). Newborns also took longer to complete trials on paper compared to other substrates (F3,112 = 10.26, P> < 0.001). Thus, substrate affected the ability of newborns to scent-trail their mother. In a natural setting, the heterogeneity of substrates may facilitate scent-trailing behavior as more conducive substrates may be present among substrates that impede scent-trailing behavior. However, as prescribed fire becomes a more popular forest management tool, care should be taken in where this tool is applied.","PeriodicalId":10701,"journal":{"name":"Copeia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Substrate Type Affects Scent-Trailing Behavior of Newborn Timber Rattlesnakes (Crotalus horridus)\",\"authors\":\"C. Howey, Erika M. Snyder\",\"doi\":\"10.1643/CE-19-274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Animals can obtain social information from monitoring chemical cues in their environment left behind by conspecifics, competitors, predators, or prey. Whereas many studies have addressed the ability of snakes to trail scents in the laboratory along a homogeneous substrate (i.e., butcher paper), our objective was to determine if the scent-trailing behavior of a snake was affected by changes in substrate type (paper, sand, leaf litter, and burnt leaf litter). We brought five pregnant Timber Rattlesnakes (Crotalus horridus) into the laboratory where each gave birth to an average of nine newborns. After each newborn shed, we conducted Y-maze trials. The scent of the mother was applied down one arm of the Y-maze. Each newborn was tested on each substrate. Newborns non-randomly chose the arm with the mother's scent 87% of the time when tested on paper (P < 0.001) and 73% of the time when tested on sand (P = 0.011). When tested on leaf litter and burnt leaf litter, newborns chose the arm with the mother's scent 67% and 53% of the time (P = 0.068 and P = 0.715, respectively). Newborns also took longer to complete trials on paper compared to other substrates (F3,112 = 10.26, P> < 0.001). Thus, substrate affected the ability of newborns to scent-trail their mother. In a natural setting, the heterogeneity of substrates may facilitate scent-trailing behavior as more conducive substrates may be present among substrates that impede scent-trailing behavior. However, as prescribed fire becomes a more popular forest management tool, care should be taken in where this tool is applied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Copeia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Copeia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1643/CE-19-274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Copeia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1643/CE-19-274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

动物可以通过监测同种动物、竞争对手、捕食者或猎物留下的环境中的化学线索来获得社会信息。尽管许多研究都涉及到蛇在实验室中沿着均匀基质(即肉纸)追踪气味的能力,但我们的目标是确定蛇的气味追踪行为是否受到基质类型(纸、沙子、落叶和烧焦的落叶)变化的影响。我们把五只怀孕的木响尾蛇(Crotalus horridus)带到实验室,每只平均生下九个新生儿。在每个新生儿棚后,我们进行Y迷宫试验。母亲的气味顺着Y形迷宫的一只手臂散发。在每种基质上对每个新生儿进行测试。新生儿在纸上测试时,87%的时间(P<0.001)和73%的时间(P=0.011)非随机选择带有母亲气味的手臂。与其他基质相比,新生儿完成纸上试验的时间也更长(F3112=10.26,P><0.001)。因此,基质影响新生儿追踪母亲气味的能力。在自然环境中,基质的异质性可能促进气味尾随行为,因为在阻碍气味尾随行为的基质中可能存在更有利的基质。然而,随着规定的火灾成为一种更受欢迎的森林管理工具,应注意该工具的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Substrate Type Affects Scent-Trailing Behavior of Newborn Timber Rattlesnakes (Crotalus horridus)
Animals can obtain social information from monitoring chemical cues in their environment left behind by conspecifics, competitors, predators, or prey. Whereas many studies have addressed the ability of snakes to trail scents in the laboratory along a homogeneous substrate (i.e., butcher paper), our objective was to determine if the scent-trailing behavior of a snake was affected by changes in substrate type (paper, sand, leaf litter, and burnt leaf litter). We brought five pregnant Timber Rattlesnakes (Crotalus horridus) into the laboratory where each gave birth to an average of nine newborns. After each newborn shed, we conducted Y-maze trials. The scent of the mother was applied down one arm of the Y-maze. Each newborn was tested on each substrate. Newborns non-randomly chose the arm with the mother's scent 87% of the time when tested on paper (P < 0.001) and 73% of the time when tested on sand (P = 0.011). When tested on leaf litter and burnt leaf litter, newborns chose the arm with the mother's scent 67% and 53% of the time (P = 0.068 and P = 0.715, respectively). Newborns also took longer to complete trials on paper compared to other substrates (F3,112 = 10.26, P> < 0.001). Thus, substrate affected the ability of newborns to scent-trail their mother. In a natural setting, the heterogeneity of substrates may facilitate scent-trailing behavior as more conducive substrates may be present among substrates that impede scent-trailing behavior. However, as prescribed fire becomes a more popular forest management tool, care should be taken in where this tool is applied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Copeia
Copeia 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 1913, Copeia is a highly respected international journal dedicated to the publication of high quality, original research papers on the behavior, conservation, ecology, genetics, morphology, evolution, physiology, systematics and taxonomy of extant and extinct fishes, amphibians, and reptiles. Copeia is published electronically and is available through BioOne. Articles are published online first, and print issues appear four times per year. In addition to research articles, Copeia publishes invited review papers, book reviews, and compiles virtual issues on topics of interest drawn from papers previously published in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Summary of the Meetings Taxonomic Index Summary Of The Meetings Taxonomic Index EDITORIAL NOTES AND NEWS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1