衡量企业失败风险:长短期记忆在所有市场中表现更好吗?

IF 1.2 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Investment Analysts Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10293523.2022.2155353
Hyeongjun Kim, Hoon Cho, Doojin Ryu
{"title":"衡量企业失败风险:长短期记忆在所有市场中表现更好吗?","authors":"Hyeongjun Kim, Hoon Cho, Doojin Ryu","doi":"10.1080/10293523.2022.2155353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Recently, various corporate failure prediction models that use machine learning techniques have received considerable attention. In particular, using a sequence of a company's historical information, rather than just the most recent information, yields better predictive performance by adopting recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithms in the United States market. Similarly, we evaluate whether these results hold in emerging market contexts using listed companies in Korea. We also compare the logistic regression, random forest, RNN, LSTM, and an ensemble model combining these four techniques. The random forest model with recent information outperforms the other models, indicating that corporate failure prediction models for immature markets, unlike those for developed markets, might have to focus more on recent information rather than on the historical sequence of corporate performance.","PeriodicalId":44496,"journal":{"name":"Investment Analysts Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":"40 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring corporate failure risk: Does long short-term memory perform better in all markets?\",\"authors\":\"Hyeongjun Kim, Hoon Cho, Doojin Ryu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10293523.2022.2155353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Recently, various corporate failure prediction models that use machine learning techniques have received considerable attention. In particular, using a sequence of a company's historical information, rather than just the most recent information, yields better predictive performance by adopting recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithms in the United States market. Similarly, we evaluate whether these results hold in emerging market contexts using listed companies in Korea. We also compare the logistic regression, random forest, RNN, LSTM, and an ensemble model combining these four techniques. The random forest model with recent information outperforms the other models, indicating that corporate failure prediction models for immature markets, unlike those for developed markets, might have to focus more on recent information rather than on the historical sequence of corporate performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investment Analysts Journal\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"40 - 52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investment Analysts Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2022.2155353\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investment Analysts Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2022.2155353","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要近年来,使用机器学习技术的各种企业故障预测模型受到了相当大的关注。特别是,通过在美国市场上采用递归神经网络(RNN)和长短期记忆(LSTM)算法,使用公司的历史信息序列,而不仅仅是最新信息,可以产生更好的预测性能。同样,我们使用韩国上市公司来评估这些结果是否适用于新兴市场。我们还比较了逻辑回归、随机森林、RNN、LSTM和结合这四种技术的集成模型。具有最近信息的随机森林模型优于其他模型,这表明不成熟市场的企业失败预测模型与发达市场的模型不同,可能必须更多地关注最近的信息,而不是企业业绩的历史序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring corporate failure risk: Does long short-term memory perform better in all markets?
ABSTRACT Recently, various corporate failure prediction models that use machine learning techniques have received considerable attention. In particular, using a sequence of a company's historical information, rather than just the most recent information, yields better predictive performance by adopting recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithms in the United States market. Similarly, we evaluate whether these results hold in emerging market contexts using listed companies in Korea. We also compare the logistic regression, random forest, RNN, LSTM, and an ensemble model combining these four techniques. The random forest model with recent information outperforms the other models, indicating that corporate failure prediction models for immature markets, unlike those for developed markets, might have to focus more on recent information rather than on the historical sequence of corporate performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investment Analysts Journal
Investment Analysts Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Investment Analysts Journal is an international, peer-reviewed journal, publishing high-quality, original research three times a year. The journal publishes significant new research in finance and investments and seeks to establish a balance between theoretical and empirical studies. Papers written in any areas of finance, investment, accounting and economics will be considered for publication. All contributions are welcome but are subject to an objective selection procedure to ensure that published articles answer the criteria of scientific objectivity, importance and replicability. Readability and good writing style are important. No articles which have been published or are under review elsewhere will be considered. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is double blind and submission is via email. Accepted papers will then pass through originality checking software. The editors reserve the right to make the final decision with respect to publication.
期刊最新文献
Employing behavioural portfolio theory for sustainable investment: Examining drawdown risks and ESG factors The spillover and leverage effects and trading volume of FinTech Exchange-Traded Funds Risk spillovers among global oil & gas firms The time-frequency-quantile causal impact of Cable News-based Economic Policy Uncertainty on major assets returns Momentum trading: How it differs among investor segments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1