一种濒危物种的引进种群的保护悖论:荷兰海岸沙丘上的锹足蟾蜍

IF 1 4区 生物学 Q3 ZOOLOGY Amphibia-Reptilia Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1163/15685381-bja10106
Stephanie Koster, Nienke M. Prins, C. Dufresnes, James G. France, Manon de Visser, R. Struijk, B. Wielstra
{"title":"一种濒危物种的引进种群的保护悖论:荷兰海岸沙丘上的锹足蟾蜍","authors":"Stephanie Koster, Nienke M. Prins, C. Dufresnes, James G. France, Manon de Visser, R. Struijk, B. Wielstra","doi":"10.1163/15685381-bja10106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nSpecies that are threatened in their native range may actually prosper as introduced populations. To investigate how such introduced populations were established involves determining from where within the natural range the founder individuals originated. This can be accomplished through mtDNA barcoding. The common spadefoot toad (Pelobates fuscus) naturally occurs in the south and east of the Netherlands and has shown a rapid decline. Yet, a flourishing introduced population was recently discovered in the coastal dunes in the west of the country. We use mtDNA barcoding to determine the provenance of the introduced population. We sampled both native and introduced populations from the Netherlands and compared our sequences to haplotypes from across the entire distribution range. The mtDNA haplotypes found in the introduced population are distinct from those naturally occurring in the Netherlands and point towards an origin in the Pannonian Basin, on the boundary between Central and Southeastern Europe. Paradoxically, the thriving P. fuscus population in the Dutch coastal dunes should be considered a conservation risk to local biodiversity, even though within the native range in the Netherlands the species is severely threatened. Our study illustrates the complicated conservation questions associated with species that are both native and invasive.","PeriodicalId":50799,"journal":{"name":"Amphibia-Reptilia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The conservation paradox of an introduced population of a threatened species: spadefoot toads in the coastal dunes of the Netherlands\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Koster, Nienke M. Prins, C. Dufresnes, James G. France, Manon de Visser, R. Struijk, B. Wielstra\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15685381-bja10106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nSpecies that are threatened in their native range may actually prosper as introduced populations. To investigate how such introduced populations were established involves determining from where within the natural range the founder individuals originated. This can be accomplished through mtDNA barcoding. The common spadefoot toad (Pelobates fuscus) naturally occurs in the south and east of the Netherlands and has shown a rapid decline. Yet, a flourishing introduced population was recently discovered in the coastal dunes in the west of the country. We use mtDNA barcoding to determine the provenance of the introduced population. We sampled both native and introduced populations from the Netherlands and compared our sequences to haplotypes from across the entire distribution range. The mtDNA haplotypes found in the introduced population are distinct from those naturally occurring in the Netherlands and point towards an origin in the Pannonian Basin, on the boundary between Central and Southeastern Europe. Paradoxically, the thriving P. fuscus population in the Dutch coastal dunes should be considered a conservation risk to local biodiversity, even though within the native range in the Netherlands the species is severely threatened. Our study illustrates the complicated conservation questions associated with species that are both native and invasive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Amphibia-Reptilia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Amphibia-Reptilia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685381-bja10106\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amphibia-Reptilia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685381-bja10106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在其原生范围内受到威胁的物种实际上可能会作为引进种群而繁荣起来。为了调查这种引入种群是如何建立的,需要确定创始个体在自然范围内的起源地。这可以通过mtDNA条形码来实现。常见的锹足蟾蜍(Pelobates fuscus)自然出现在荷兰南部和东部,并呈快速下降趋势。然而,最近在该国西部的海岸沙丘上发现了大量的外来种群。我们使用mtDNA条形码来确定引入种群的来源。我们对来自荷兰的本地和引进种群进行了采样,并将我们的序列与整个分布范围内的单倍型进行了比较。在引入的种群中发现的mtDNA单倍型与荷兰自然存在的单倍型不同,并指向中欧和东南欧边界的潘诺尼亚盆地。矛盾的是,荷兰海岸沙丘中繁荣的P.fuscus种群应该被视为对当地生物多样性的保护风险,尽管在荷兰本土,该物种受到严重威胁。我们的研究说明了与本土和入侵物种相关的复杂保护问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The conservation paradox of an introduced population of a threatened species: spadefoot toads in the coastal dunes of the Netherlands
Species that are threatened in their native range may actually prosper as introduced populations. To investigate how such introduced populations were established involves determining from where within the natural range the founder individuals originated. This can be accomplished through mtDNA barcoding. The common spadefoot toad (Pelobates fuscus) naturally occurs in the south and east of the Netherlands and has shown a rapid decline. Yet, a flourishing introduced population was recently discovered in the coastal dunes in the west of the country. We use mtDNA barcoding to determine the provenance of the introduced population. We sampled both native and introduced populations from the Netherlands and compared our sequences to haplotypes from across the entire distribution range. The mtDNA haplotypes found in the introduced population are distinct from those naturally occurring in the Netherlands and point towards an origin in the Pannonian Basin, on the boundary between Central and Southeastern Europe. Paradoxically, the thriving P. fuscus population in the Dutch coastal dunes should be considered a conservation risk to local biodiversity, even though within the native range in the Netherlands the species is severely threatened. Our study illustrates the complicated conservation questions associated with species that are both native and invasive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Amphibia-Reptilia
Amphibia-Reptilia 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Amphibia-Reptilia is a leading European multi-disciplinary journal devoted to most of the aspects of herpetology: ecology, behaviour, evolution, conservation, physiology, morphology, paleontology, genetics, and systematics. Amphibia-Reptilia publishes high quality original papers, short-notes, reviews, book reviews and news of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica (SEH). The Societas Europaea Herpteologica (SEH) website is located at: www.seh-herpetology.org.
期刊最新文献
Risk-taking salamanders share less space with conspecifics Thermoregulation and activity patterns of three species of snakes with different lifestyles in central Mexico Acoustics of parental and hybridogenetic water frogs (Pelophylax: Amphibia: Ranidae): a tool for monitoring an invasive species Alien amphibian introductions via the plant trade: a breeding population of the Catalonian midwife toad (Alytes almogavarii) in Central Spain Diet variations across remote populations of a widely distributed snake species, the Asp viper (Vipera aspis aspis, Linnaeus, 1758)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1