宪法和知识产权:平衡知识创造和获取的新框架

Juan Pablo Iglesias Mujica
{"title":"宪法和知识产权:平衡知识创造和获取的新框架","authors":"Juan Pablo Iglesias Mujica","doi":"10.4067/s0718-80722021000300255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current constitutional provision on intellectual property (Art. 19 No. 25) is deficient since it is opaque regarding the economic and social objectives of said type of property. For this reason and considering the growth of the intangible-based economy in the 21st century, it becomes necessary and opportune to design a new constitutional provision that does not thoughtlessly refer to the general rule on property, in order to show the instrumental nature of intellectual property, as a tool to solve the “public good” market failure that affects the goods that are its object (which are non-rivalrous and non-excludable). Therefore, a new constitutional rule must be based on the promise of intellectual property, that is, optimizing the equilibrium between creation and access to knowledge, thus providing a general framework so that the legislator, public offices and adjudicators can then “update” such equilibrium considering the state of development of the country. The article proposes a text of constitutional provision that can be grounded in Ralwsian terms, that is, from a hypothetical scenario of “original position”. Moreover, the article explains that the proposed text is not exhausted in a mere programmatic declaration, thus mentioning what type of concrete effects it can produce within the legal system.","PeriodicalId":36265,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CONSTITUCIÓN Y PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL: UN NUEVO MARCO PARA BALANCEAR LA CREACIÓN Y ACCESO AL CONOCIMIENTO\",\"authors\":\"Juan Pablo Iglesias Mujica\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0718-80722021000300255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current constitutional provision on intellectual property (Art. 19 No. 25) is deficient since it is opaque regarding the economic and social objectives of said type of property. For this reason and considering the growth of the intangible-based economy in the 21st century, it becomes necessary and opportune to design a new constitutional provision that does not thoughtlessly refer to the general rule on property, in order to show the instrumental nature of intellectual property, as a tool to solve the “public good” market failure that affects the goods that are its object (which are non-rivalrous and non-excludable). Therefore, a new constitutional rule must be based on the promise of intellectual property, that is, optimizing the equilibrium between creation and access to knowledge, thus providing a general framework so that the legislator, public offices and adjudicators can then “update” such equilibrium considering the state of development of the country. The article proposes a text of constitutional provision that can be grounded in Ralwsian terms, that is, from a hypothetical scenario of “original position”. Moreover, the article explains that the proposed text is not exhausted in a mere programmatic declaration, thus mentioning what type of concrete effects it can produce within the legal system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-80722021000300255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-80722021000300255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现行宪法关于知识产权的规定(第19条第25款)是有缺陷的,因为它对这类财产的经济和社会目标不透明。因此,考虑到21世纪无形经济的发展,设计一项新的宪法条款,不轻率地提及财产的一般规则,以显示知识产权的工具性,作为解决“公共产品”市场失灵的工具,这种失灵影响到作为其对象的商品(非竞争性和非排他性)。因此,一项新的宪法规则必须建立在知识产权承诺的基础上,即优化创造和获取知识之间的平衡,从而提供一个总体框架,以便立法者、公职人员和裁决者能够根据国家的发展状况“更新”这种平衡。这篇文章提出了一个宪法条款文本,该文本可以用拉尔夫的术语来基础,即从“原始立场”的假设情景出发。此外,该条解释说,拟议案文并没有在仅仅一项纲领性声明中用尽,因此提到了它可以在法律体系内产生什么样的具体效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CONSTITUCIÓN Y PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL: UN NUEVO MARCO PARA BALANCEAR LA CREACIÓN Y ACCESO AL CONOCIMIENTO
The current constitutional provision on intellectual property (Art. 19 No. 25) is deficient since it is opaque regarding the economic and social objectives of said type of property. For this reason and considering the growth of the intangible-based economy in the 21st century, it becomes necessary and opportune to design a new constitutional provision that does not thoughtlessly refer to the general rule on property, in order to show the instrumental nature of intellectual property, as a tool to solve the “public good” market failure that affects the goods that are its object (which are non-rivalrous and non-excludable). Therefore, a new constitutional rule must be based on the promise of intellectual property, that is, optimizing the equilibrium between creation and access to knowledge, thus providing a general framework so that the legislator, public offices and adjudicators can then “update” such equilibrium considering the state of development of the country. The article proposes a text of constitutional provision that can be grounded in Ralwsian terms, that is, from a hypothetical scenario of “original position”. Moreover, the article explains that the proposed text is not exhausted in a mere programmatic declaration, thus mentioning what type of concrete effects it can produce within the legal system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
EL INTERÉS COMPROMETIDO EN LA DECLARACIÓN DE CLÁUSULAS ABUSIVAS COMO JUSTIFICANTE DE LA ACCIÓN POR EL INTERÉS GENERAL NO RENOVACIONES DE MATRÍCULAS DE NIÑOS, NIÑAS Y ADOLESCENTES CON TRASTORNO DE DÉFICIT ATENCIONAL E HIPERACTIVIDAD: UNO DE LOS PROBLEMAS QUE DEBE RESOLVER una educación verdaderamente inclusiva APLICACIÓN DE LAS NORMAS CONTENIDAS EN LA LEY N.º 19496 A COMUNICACIONES DE NATURALEZA PUBLICITARIA EMITIDAS POR LÍDERES DE OPINIÓN O INFLUENCERS EL LITIGANTE APARENTE EN EL CÓDIGO DE ÉTICA PROFESIONAL DEL COLEGIO DE ABOGADOS DE CHILE A.G. LA CLÁUSULA “SE FACULTA AL PORTADOR” COMO MANDATO INNOMINADO QUE TERMINA CON LA MUERTE DEL COMPRADOR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1