物理治疗师教育研究的挑战和机遇:来自美国学术物理治疗需求评估委员会的调查结果

Tara Dickson, Jody Eckert, P. Pabian, Jamie L. Greco
{"title":"物理治疗师教育研究的挑战和机遇:来自美国学术物理治疗需求评估委员会的调查结果","authors":"Tara Dickson, Jody Eckert, P. Pabian, Jamie L. Greco","doi":"10.1097/jte.0000000000000297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The physical therapy (PT) profession has cited a need for education research, yet the needs of researchers are not fully understood. Furthermore, there continues to be a limited understanding of where resources are most needed to support and advance education research. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers and opportunities for education research to support PT faculty.\n \n \n \n Scholarly productivity may be related to the attainment of an academic doctoral degree, research culture within an institution, and faculty time devoted to research. There is a lack of knowledge about what factors relate to the production of education research and the types of support needed for education researchers.\n \n \n \n Two hundred sixteen PT education researchers.\n \n \n \n An open survey invitation was sent through email through the American Council of Academic Physical Therapy newsletter. A multiple regression analysis was used to determine factors that were associated with scholarly productivity of education researchers in PT. Open responses to a question regarding needed resources for engagement in education research were qualitatively analyzed.\n \n \n \n The multiple regression analysis yielded a large effect (R2 = 0.31), demonstrating that faculty years of experience, faculty rank, and having an academic doctoral degree were correlated with scholarly productivity. “Faculty time/workload” was considered “very important” or higher to the production of education research by 87% of respondents. This item was rated of highest importance on the survey. Mentorship was considered the most important external resource, with 69% of respondents rating it as “very important” or higher, whereas “other personal commitments (ie, family care, household management, other community-related volunteer commitments)” was the most important personal factor (rated by 70% of the respondents as “very important” or higher). Open-ended responses further suggest that institution logistics, appropriate dissemination venues, and funding are areas of need to foster success in engaging in education research.\n \n \n \n Results highlight challenges and opportunities for resource investment in education research. Among these are time and funding. Existing professional networking and educational opportunities need to be continually evaluated for their effectiveness. Further development should focus on mitigating these barriers while considering the logistics of the researcher's institution.\n","PeriodicalId":91351,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges and Opportunities for Physical Therapist Education Research: Results From an American Council of Academic Physical Therapy Needs Assessment Survey\",\"authors\":\"Tara Dickson, Jody Eckert, P. Pabian, Jamie L. Greco\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/jte.0000000000000297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n The physical therapy (PT) profession has cited a need for education research, yet the needs of researchers are not fully understood. Furthermore, there continues to be a limited understanding of where resources are most needed to support and advance education research. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers and opportunities for education research to support PT faculty.\\n \\n \\n \\n Scholarly productivity may be related to the attainment of an academic doctoral degree, research culture within an institution, and faculty time devoted to research. There is a lack of knowledge about what factors relate to the production of education research and the types of support needed for education researchers.\\n \\n \\n \\n Two hundred sixteen PT education researchers.\\n \\n \\n \\n An open survey invitation was sent through email through the American Council of Academic Physical Therapy newsletter. A multiple regression analysis was used to determine factors that were associated with scholarly productivity of education researchers in PT. Open responses to a question regarding needed resources for engagement in education research were qualitatively analyzed.\\n \\n \\n \\n The multiple regression analysis yielded a large effect (R2 = 0.31), demonstrating that faculty years of experience, faculty rank, and having an academic doctoral degree were correlated with scholarly productivity. “Faculty time/workload” was considered “very important” or higher to the production of education research by 87% of respondents. This item was rated of highest importance on the survey. Mentorship was considered the most important external resource, with 69% of respondents rating it as “very important” or higher, whereas “other personal commitments (ie, family care, household management, other community-related volunteer commitments)” was the most important personal factor (rated by 70% of the respondents as “very important” or higher). Open-ended responses further suggest that institution logistics, appropriate dissemination venues, and funding are areas of need to foster success in engaging in education research.\\n \\n \\n \\n Results highlight challenges and opportunities for resource investment in education research. Among these are time and funding. Existing professional networking and educational opportunities need to be continually evaluated for their effectiveness. Further development should focus on mitigating these barriers while considering the logistics of the researcher's institution.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":91351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal, physical therapy education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal, physical therapy education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/jte.0000000000000297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jte.0000000000000297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物理治疗(PT)专业人士提出了教育研究的需求,但研究人员的需求尚未得到充分理解。此外,对支持和推进教育研究最需要资源的地方仍然了解有限。本研究的目的是确定教育研究支持PT教师的障碍和机会。学术生产力可能与学术博士学位的获得、机构内的研究文化以及教师投入研究的时间有关。对于与教育研究成果相关的因素以及教育研究人员所需的支持类型,人们缺乏了解。216名PT教育研究人员。通过美国学术物理治疗委员会通讯通过电子邮件发出了一份公开调查邀请。多元回归分析用于确定与PT教育研究人员学术生产力相关的因素。对参与教育研究所需资源问题的公开回答进行了定性分析。多元回归分析产生了很大的影响(R2=0.31),表明教师的经验年限、教师级别和拥有学术博士学位与学术生产力相关。87%的受访者认为“教师时间/工作量”对教育研究的产生“非常重要”或更高。这个项目在调查中被评为最重要的项目。导师制被认为是最重要的外部资源,69%的受访者将其评为“非常重要”或更高,而“其他个人承诺(即家庭护理、家庭管理、其他与社区相关的志愿者承诺)”是最主要的个人因素(70%的受访者将之评为“十分重要”或更低)。不限成员名额的答复进一步表明,机构后勤、适当的传播场所和资金是促进教育研究成功的必要领域。研究结果突出了教育研究资源投资的挑战和机遇。其中包括时间和资金。需要不断评估现有的专业网络和教育机会的有效性。进一步的发展应侧重于减轻这些障碍,同时考虑研究机构的后勤保障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Challenges and Opportunities for Physical Therapist Education Research: Results From an American Council of Academic Physical Therapy Needs Assessment Survey
The physical therapy (PT) profession has cited a need for education research, yet the needs of researchers are not fully understood. Furthermore, there continues to be a limited understanding of where resources are most needed to support and advance education research. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers and opportunities for education research to support PT faculty. Scholarly productivity may be related to the attainment of an academic doctoral degree, research culture within an institution, and faculty time devoted to research. There is a lack of knowledge about what factors relate to the production of education research and the types of support needed for education researchers. Two hundred sixteen PT education researchers. An open survey invitation was sent through email through the American Council of Academic Physical Therapy newsletter. A multiple regression analysis was used to determine factors that were associated with scholarly productivity of education researchers in PT. Open responses to a question regarding needed resources for engagement in education research were qualitatively analyzed. The multiple regression analysis yielded a large effect (R2 = 0.31), demonstrating that faculty years of experience, faculty rank, and having an academic doctoral degree were correlated with scholarly productivity. “Faculty time/workload” was considered “very important” or higher to the production of education research by 87% of respondents. This item was rated of highest importance on the survey. Mentorship was considered the most important external resource, with 69% of respondents rating it as “very important” or higher, whereas “other personal commitments (ie, family care, household management, other community-related volunteer commitments)” was the most important personal factor (rated by 70% of the respondents as “very important” or higher). Open-ended responses further suggest that institution logistics, appropriate dissemination venues, and funding are areas of need to foster success in engaging in education research. Results highlight challenges and opportunities for resource investment in education research. Among these are time and funding. Existing professional networking and educational opportunities need to be continually evaluated for their effectiveness. Further development should focus on mitigating these barriers while considering the logistics of the researcher's institution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Gender Differences in Letters of Recommendation for Physical Therapy Residency Applications. Do We Make a Difference? The Effect of a Doctor of Physical Therapy Program Curriculum on Student Cultural Competence. Student Pedagogical Consultants: A Strategy for Increasing Diversity, Equity, Inclusivity, and a Sense of Belonging in Curricular Approaches in Physical Therapist Education. Influencing Physical Therapist's Self-efficacy for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Through Blended Learning: A Mixed Methods Study. A Continuous Quality Improvement Framework for Sustainable Action and Advancement of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging in Physical Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1