在物质门槛上的不公正和侮辱

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW Alternative Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1177/1037969X231175181
Catherine Zhou
{"title":"在物质门槛上的不公正和侮辱","authors":"Catherine Zhou","doi":"10.1177/1037969X231175181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the role of dignity in the context of procedural fairness and the threshold of materiality. The author argues that dignity and indignation operate as social contingencies with expressive and constitutive consequences. The author particularly analyses the use of dignity as a justification for procedural fairness, and the ways in which a socio-political concept of dignity facilitates contestation of the law. Finally, the author explains how the threshold of materiality has conversely diminished such contestation by diminishing indignation.","PeriodicalId":44595,"journal":{"name":"Alternative Law Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"210 - 215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Injustice and indignity in the threshold of materiality\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1037969X231175181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article considers the role of dignity in the context of procedural fairness and the threshold of materiality. The author argues that dignity and indignation operate as social contingencies with expressive and constitutive consequences. The author particularly analyses the use of dignity as a justification for procedural fairness, and the ways in which a socio-political concept of dignity facilitates contestation of the law. Finally, the author explains how the threshold of materiality has conversely diminished such contestation by diminishing indignation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"210 - 215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X231175181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X231175181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考虑尊严在程序公平和物质性阈值的背景下的作用。作者认为,尊严和愤慨作为具有表达性和构成性后果的社会偶然事件发挥作用。作者特别分析了使用尊严作为程序公平的理由,以及尊严的社会政治概念如何促进对法律的争论。最后,作者解释了物质性的门槛如何反过来通过减少愤怒来减少这种争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Injustice and indignity in the threshold of materiality
This article considers the role of dignity in the context of procedural fairness and the threshold of materiality. The author argues that dignity and indignation operate as social contingencies with expressive and constitutive consequences. The author particularly analyses the use of dignity as a justification for procedural fairness, and the ways in which a socio-political concept of dignity facilitates contestation of the law. Finally, the author explains how the threshold of materiality has conversely diminished such contestation by diminishing indignation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
Coming, ready or not Beyond the Preamble: Legislating the right to self-determination in a NSW Human Rights Act Family inclusion in child protection: Law, courts and balancing risks Returning to rebellious roots: What rebellious lawyering can offer progressive law in Australia Forks in the road to equality: The path for same-sex attracted individuals in Australia and Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1