{"title":"在物质门槛上的不公正和侮辱","authors":"Catherine Zhou","doi":"10.1177/1037969X231175181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the role of dignity in the context of procedural fairness and the threshold of materiality. The author argues that dignity and indignation operate as social contingencies with expressive and constitutive consequences. The author particularly analyses the use of dignity as a justification for procedural fairness, and the ways in which a socio-political concept of dignity facilitates contestation of the law. Finally, the author explains how the threshold of materiality has conversely diminished such contestation by diminishing indignation.","PeriodicalId":44595,"journal":{"name":"Alternative Law Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"210 - 215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Injustice and indignity in the threshold of materiality\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1037969X231175181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article considers the role of dignity in the context of procedural fairness and the threshold of materiality. The author argues that dignity and indignation operate as social contingencies with expressive and constitutive consequences. The author particularly analyses the use of dignity as a justification for procedural fairness, and the ways in which a socio-political concept of dignity facilitates contestation of the law. Finally, the author explains how the threshold of materiality has conversely diminished such contestation by diminishing indignation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"210 - 215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X231175181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X231175181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Injustice and indignity in the threshold of materiality
This article considers the role of dignity in the context of procedural fairness and the threshold of materiality. The author argues that dignity and indignation operate as social contingencies with expressive and constitutive consequences. The author particularly analyses the use of dignity as a justification for procedural fairness, and the ways in which a socio-political concept of dignity facilitates contestation of the law. Finally, the author explains how the threshold of materiality has conversely diminished such contestation by diminishing indignation.