{"title":"Hennen van Merchtenen和Brabantsche yeesten的延续(约1430-1450)","authors":"J. Reynaert","doi":"10.5117/nedlet2019.1.001.reyn","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Hennen van Merchtenen and the Continuation of the Brabantsche yeesten (ca. 1430-1450): The attribution problem\n \n \n In 1432, a Brabantine poet completed the first of two volumes which together would constitute the Voortzetting van de Brabantsche yeesten, a detailed account of the more recent history of the duchy of Brabant, meant as a complement to the authoritative history of Brabant, the Brabantsche yeesten, which Jan van Boendale had finalised about the middle of the fourteenth century. As a whole, the Voortzetting would cover the period from about 1350 until the birth of Philip the Good’s son, the later Charles the Bold, in 1433. The text is anonymous, but some historians have seriously considered an attribution to Hennen van Merchtenen, the author of a Chronicle of Brabant (Cornicke van Brabant), presented to duke John IV in 1415, in which Merchtenen committed himself to a much more important historical work, on condition that the necessary means were granted to him. Merchtenen was also a judicial officer in the service of the duke, and, because his traces in the archives disappear after 1418, it was assumed that he had died relatively shortly after that year. In this article, we contest this assumption and adduce a number of arguments concerning tenor and style in favour of one authorship for the Cornicke van Brabant and the Voortzetting.","PeriodicalId":39266,"journal":{"name":"Nederlandse Letterkunde","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hennen van Merchtenen en de Voortzetting van de Brabantsche yeesten (ca. 1430-1450)\",\"authors\":\"J. Reynaert\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/nedlet2019.1.001.reyn\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Hennen van Merchtenen and the Continuation of the Brabantsche yeesten (ca. 1430-1450): The attribution problem\\n \\n \\n In 1432, a Brabantine poet completed the first of two volumes which together would constitute the Voortzetting van de Brabantsche yeesten, a detailed account of the more recent history of the duchy of Brabant, meant as a complement to the authoritative history of Brabant, the Brabantsche yeesten, which Jan van Boendale had finalised about the middle of the fourteenth century. As a whole, the Voortzetting would cover the period from about 1350 until the birth of Philip the Good’s son, the later Charles the Bold, in 1433. The text is anonymous, but some historians have seriously considered an attribution to Hennen van Merchtenen, the author of a Chronicle of Brabant (Cornicke van Brabant), presented to duke John IV in 1415, in which Merchtenen committed himself to a much more important historical work, on condition that the necessary means were granted to him. Merchtenen was also a judicial officer in the service of the duke, and, because his traces in the archives disappear after 1418, it was assumed that he had died relatively shortly after that year. In this article, we contest this assumption and adduce a number of arguments concerning tenor and style in favour of one authorship for the Cornicke van Brabant and the Voortzetting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederlandse Letterkunde\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederlandse Letterkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/nedlet2019.1.001.reyn\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlandse Letterkunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/nedlet2019.1.001.reyn","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Hennen van Merchteen和Brabantsche yeesten的续编(约1430-1450年):归属问题1432年,一位Brabantine诗人完成了两卷中的第一卷,这两卷合在一起构成了《布拉班特公爵领地的Voortzetting van de Brabantssche yeesten》,这是对布拉班特公爵领地最近历史的详细描述,旨在补充布拉班德的权威历史,Jan van Boendale于14世纪中期完成的Brabantsche yeesten。总的来说,Voortzetting将涵盖从1350年左右到1433年菲利普的儿子,即后来的大胆查理出生的这段时间。该文本是匿名的,但一些历史学家认真考虑将其归因于《布拉班特编年史》(Cornicke van Brabant)的作者Hennen van Merchteen,该编年史于1415年提交给约翰四世公爵,在该编年史中,Merchteenn致力于一项更重要的历史工作,条件是给予他必要的手段。Merchteen也是一名为公爵服务的司法官员,由于他在档案中的痕迹在1418年后消失,人们认为他在那一年后不久就去世了。在这篇文章中,我们对这一假设提出了质疑,并引用了许多关于男高音和风格的论点,支持Cornicke van Brabant和Voortzetting的一位作者。
Hennen van Merchtenen en de Voortzetting van de Brabantsche yeesten (ca. 1430-1450)
Hennen van Merchtenen and the Continuation of the Brabantsche yeesten (ca. 1430-1450): The attribution problem
In 1432, a Brabantine poet completed the first of two volumes which together would constitute the Voortzetting van de Brabantsche yeesten, a detailed account of the more recent history of the duchy of Brabant, meant as a complement to the authoritative history of Brabant, the Brabantsche yeesten, which Jan van Boendale had finalised about the middle of the fourteenth century. As a whole, the Voortzetting would cover the period from about 1350 until the birth of Philip the Good’s son, the later Charles the Bold, in 1433. The text is anonymous, but some historians have seriously considered an attribution to Hennen van Merchtenen, the author of a Chronicle of Brabant (Cornicke van Brabant), presented to duke John IV in 1415, in which Merchtenen committed himself to a much more important historical work, on condition that the necessary means were granted to him. Merchtenen was also a judicial officer in the service of the duke, and, because his traces in the archives disappear after 1418, it was assumed that he had died relatively shortly after that year. In this article, we contest this assumption and adduce a number of arguments concerning tenor and style in favour of one authorship for the Cornicke van Brabant and the Voortzetting.