氙气麻醉中动态通气参数的观察研究

Bazin Je
{"title":"氙气麻醉中动态通气参数的观察研究","authors":"Bazin Je","doi":"10.26420/AUSTINJANESTHESIAANDANALGESIA.2021.1098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study was to observe dynamic pressure and flow measurements during the breathing cycle with different concentrations of xenon in patients without pulmonary disease to provide a better understanding of the mechanical-physiological effects of gas mixtures for anesthesia and other potential applications. Ventilation and respiratory data monitoring of flow rate, pressure at the Y-piece of the ventilator circuit, inhaled volume, and concentration of oxygen, xenon, and carbon dioxide for three concentrations of xenon (0, 30, and 60%) were recorded on the anesthetic ventilator station and downloaded to a portable computer. Main Findings: The overall effects of gas concentration are compared in the superimposed flow and pressure curves recorded from the ventilator. Airway resistance increases with xenon concentration for both inspiration (p=0.0028) and expiration (p=0.0007) as expected. The compliance increased with increasing xenon concentration, but only to statistical significance between 100% oxygen and 60% xenon (p=0.0344). The percentage of pressure drop due to the breathing circuit were about 70% for all the groups (no differences statistically, p=0.8161). Conclusions: The results show that the dominant source of the pressure loss is from the breathing circuit compared to the respiratory tract in patients without respiratory disease during inspiration.","PeriodicalId":92989,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of anesthesia and analgesia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observational Study of Dynamic Ventilation Parameters during Xenon Anesthesia\",\"authors\":\"Bazin Je\",\"doi\":\"10.26420/AUSTINJANESTHESIAANDANALGESIA.2021.1098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The aim of this study was to observe dynamic pressure and flow measurements during the breathing cycle with different concentrations of xenon in patients without pulmonary disease to provide a better understanding of the mechanical-physiological effects of gas mixtures for anesthesia and other potential applications. Ventilation and respiratory data monitoring of flow rate, pressure at the Y-piece of the ventilator circuit, inhaled volume, and concentration of oxygen, xenon, and carbon dioxide for three concentrations of xenon (0, 30, and 60%) were recorded on the anesthetic ventilator station and downloaded to a portable computer. Main Findings: The overall effects of gas concentration are compared in the superimposed flow and pressure curves recorded from the ventilator. Airway resistance increases with xenon concentration for both inspiration (p=0.0028) and expiration (p=0.0007) as expected. The compliance increased with increasing xenon concentration, but only to statistical significance between 100% oxygen and 60% xenon (p=0.0344). The percentage of pressure drop due to the breathing circuit were about 70% for all the groups (no differences statistically, p=0.8161). Conclusions: The results show that the dominant source of the pressure loss is from the breathing circuit compared to the respiratory tract in patients without respiratory disease during inspiration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austin journal of anesthesia and analgesia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austin journal of anesthesia and analgesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26420/AUSTINJANESTHESIAANDANALGESIA.2021.1098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/AUSTINJANESTHESIAANDANALGESIA.2021.1098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是观察无肺部疾病患者呼吸周期中不同浓度氙气的动态压力和流量测量,以更好地了解混合气体在麻醉和其他潜在应用中的机械生理效应。在麻醉呼吸机上记录三种氙气浓度(0、30、60%)下的流量、呼吸机回路y段压力、吸入量和氧、氙、二氧化碳浓度的通气和呼吸数据监测,并下载到便携式计算机上。主要发现:在呼吸机记录的叠加流量和压力曲线中比较了气体浓度的总体影响。气道阻力随吸气(p=0.0028)和呼气(p=0.0007)浓度的增加而增加。顺应性随氙浓度的增加而增加,但仅在100%氧和60%氙之间有统计学意义(p=0.0344)。各组呼吸回路引起的压降比例均在70%左右(p=0.8161,差异无统计学意义)。结论:非呼吸系统疾病患者吸气时压力损失的主要来源是呼吸回路,而非呼吸道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Observational Study of Dynamic Ventilation Parameters during Xenon Anesthesia
Background: The aim of this study was to observe dynamic pressure and flow measurements during the breathing cycle with different concentrations of xenon in patients without pulmonary disease to provide a better understanding of the mechanical-physiological effects of gas mixtures for anesthesia and other potential applications. Ventilation and respiratory data monitoring of flow rate, pressure at the Y-piece of the ventilator circuit, inhaled volume, and concentration of oxygen, xenon, and carbon dioxide for three concentrations of xenon (0, 30, and 60%) were recorded on the anesthetic ventilator station and downloaded to a portable computer. Main Findings: The overall effects of gas concentration are compared in the superimposed flow and pressure curves recorded from the ventilator. Airway resistance increases with xenon concentration for both inspiration (p=0.0028) and expiration (p=0.0007) as expected. The compliance increased with increasing xenon concentration, but only to statistical significance between 100% oxygen and 60% xenon (p=0.0344). The percentage of pressure drop due to the breathing circuit were about 70% for all the groups (no differences statistically, p=0.8161). Conclusions: The results show that the dominant source of the pressure loss is from the breathing circuit compared to the respiratory tract in patients without respiratory disease during inspiration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the Efficacy of Postoperative Pain Relief in Ultrasound Guided Fascia Illiaca Compartment Block versus Epidural Block on Quality of Recovery (QOR-15) in Patients Undergoing Femoral Surgery Epidemiological Profiles of COVID-19 Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Neurogenic Bradycardia in Perioperative of Neurosurgery: A Dreadful Complication 2 Cases and Literature Review Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Spinal Anaesthesia in Adults Patients: Comparison of Isobaric Bupivacaine 0.5% in 80mg/Ml and 40 Mg/Ml Glucose Solutions Comparison of Rocuronium-Sugammadex and Succinylcholine during Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Small Observational Case Series Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1