分解白人的挑战:反种族主义素养的基础

Patrick L. Bruch
{"title":"分解白人的挑战:反种族主义素养的基础","authors":"Patrick L. Bruch","doi":"10.1080/10790195.2023.2251138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In his Chair’s address to the Conference on College Composition and Communication in 1996, Lester Faigley argued that one important consistency throughout the history of composition studies has been “that we have remained steadfast to the goal of literacy for equality” (p. 41). As Chair of the same Conference over two decades later, Asao Inoue challenged compositionists to confront the uncomfortable paradox of Whiteness: believing ourselves to be on the right side of history can distract us from recognizing our involvement in White supremacy. Though talk of race has been a consistent focus of 21st century composition research, addressing the narratives of innocence that protect Whiteness is relatively new. This essay attempts to clarify and extend the strengths of this recent development. In it I analyze how challenging Whiteness promises to advance the legacy of racially conscious research in higher education, describe a critical pedagogy situated in a predominantly White institution that tries to build on the strengths of recent critiques of Whiteness, and offer examples of students struggling with the persistent epistemologies of Whiteness as they work to invent new critical literacies.","PeriodicalId":37761,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College Reading and Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Challenges of Decomposing Whiteness: Foundations for Antiracist Literacies\",\"authors\":\"Patrick L. Bruch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790195.2023.2251138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In his Chair’s address to the Conference on College Composition and Communication in 1996, Lester Faigley argued that one important consistency throughout the history of composition studies has been “that we have remained steadfast to the goal of literacy for equality” (p. 41). As Chair of the same Conference over two decades later, Asao Inoue challenged compositionists to confront the uncomfortable paradox of Whiteness: believing ourselves to be on the right side of history can distract us from recognizing our involvement in White supremacy. Though talk of race has been a consistent focus of 21st century composition research, addressing the narratives of innocence that protect Whiteness is relatively new. This essay attempts to clarify and extend the strengths of this recent development. In it I analyze how challenging Whiteness promises to advance the legacy of racially conscious research in higher education, describe a critical pedagogy situated in a predominantly White institution that tries to build on the strengths of recent critiques of Whiteness, and offer examples of students struggling with the persistent epistemologies of Whiteness as they work to invent new critical literacies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of College Reading and Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of College Reading and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2023.2251138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College Reading and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2023.2251138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要Lester Faigley在1996年的大学作文与传播会议上发表的主席讲话中认为,作文研究历史上的一个重要一致性是“我们一直坚定不移地实现扫盲促进平等的目标”(第41页)。20多年后,作为同一届会议的主席,井上朝雄向合成学家提出挑战,要求他们直面白人这一令人不安的悖论:认为自己站在历史的正确一边会分散我们对白人至上主义的认识。尽管种族话题一直是21世纪作文研究的焦点,但解决保护白人的无辜叙事相对较新。本文试图澄清和扩展这一最新发展的优势。在这篇文章中,我分析了“白人”如何有挑战性地推动高等教育中种族意识研究的遗产,描述了一种位于白人占主导地位的机构中的批判性教学法,该机构试图在最近对“白人”的批评的优势上再接再厉,并提供学生在努力发明新的批判性文学时与白人的持久认识论作斗争的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Challenges of Decomposing Whiteness: Foundations for Antiracist Literacies
ABSTRACT In his Chair’s address to the Conference on College Composition and Communication in 1996, Lester Faigley argued that one important consistency throughout the history of composition studies has been “that we have remained steadfast to the goal of literacy for equality” (p. 41). As Chair of the same Conference over two decades later, Asao Inoue challenged compositionists to confront the uncomfortable paradox of Whiteness: believing ourselves to be on the right side of history can distract us from recognizing our involvement in White supremacy. Though talk of race has been a consistent focus of 21st century composition research, addressing the narratives of innocence that protect Whiteness is relatively new. This essay attempts to clarify and extend the strengths of this recent development. In it I analyze how challenging Whiteness promises to advance the legacy of racially conscious research in higher education, describe a critical pedagogy situated in a predominantly White institution that tries to build on the strengths of recent critiques of Whiteness, and offer examples of students struggling with the persistent epistemologies of Whiteness as they work to invent new critical literacies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of College Reading and Learning
Journal of College Reading and Learning Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Journal of College Reading and Learning (JCRL) invites authors to submit their scholarly research for publication. JCRL is an international forum for the publication of high-quality articles on theory, research, and policy related to areas of developmental education, postsecondary literacy instruction, and learning assistance at the postsecondary level. JCRL is published triannually in the spring, summer, and fall for the College Reading and Learning Association (CRLA). In addition to publishing investigations of the reading, writing, thinking, and studying of college learners, JCRL seeks manuscripts with a college focus on the following topics: effective teaching for struggling learners, learning through new technologies and texts, learning support for culturally and linguistically diverse student populations, and program evaluations of developmental and learning assistance instructional models.
期刊最新文献
Hospitality in the Writing Center: A Conceptual Framework for Tutors Navigating Academic Arguments: Teaching Reporting Verbs in Transitional Reading Courses Identifying Clusters of Less-Skilled College Student Readers Based on Cognitive Processes Bridging the Printed or Digital Controversy: A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Digital and Print Resources on College Students’ Reading Comprehension Metacognitive Experiences of EFL Students as Predictors of Enjoyment, Engagement, and Performance in L2 Writing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1