{"title":"约翰·潘的混合关系理论","authors":"L. Novák","doi":"10.1353/frc.2022.a904649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"John Punch (or Ponce; Latin Joannes Poncius, or, occasionally, Pontius, 1599/1603–1661), an Irish Franciscan in exile, unorthodox Scotist and a skilled collaborator of the famous Luke Wadding, is interesting for his fresh and open-minded approach to traditional Scotist doctrines. His take on the theory of relations, which is the topic of this paper, is no exception. As I will show, in his Integer philosophiae cursus ad mentem Scoti1 he only pretends to be defending a doctrine considered to be traditionally “Scotist,” his true mind being apparently quite different.","PeriodicalId":53533,"journal":{"name":"Franciscan Studies","volume":"80 1","pages":"137 - 170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"John Punch's Hybrid Theory of Relations\",\"authors\":\"L. Novák\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/frc.2022.a904649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"John Punch (or Ponce; Latin Joannes Poncius, or, occasionally, Pontius, 1599/1603–1661), an Irish Franciscan in exile, unorthodox Scotist and a skilled collaborator of the famous Luke Wadding, is interesting for his fresh and open-minded approach to traditional Scotist doctrines. His take on the theory of relations, which is the topic of this paper, is no exception. As I will show, in his Integer philosophiae cursus ad mentem Scoti1 he only pretends to be defending a doctrine considered to be traditionally “Scotist,” his true mind being apparently quite different.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Franciscan Studies\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"137 - 170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Franciscan Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/frc.2022.a904649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Franciscan Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/frc.2022.a904649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
John Punch（或Ponce；拉丁语Joannes Poncius，或偶尔的Pontius，1599/1603–1661），一位流亡的爱尔兰方济各会教徒，非正统的苏格兰主义者，也是著名的卢克·沃丁的熟练合作者，他对传统的苏格兰主义教义采取了新鲜而开放的态度，这一点很有趣。他对关系论的看法也不例外，这也是本文的主题。正如我将要展示的那样，在他的《苏格兰整体哲学》1中，他只是假装在捍卫一种传统上被认为是“苏格兰主义者”的学说，他的真实想法显然完全不同。
John Punch (or Ponce; Latin Joannes Poncius, or, occasionally, Pontius, 1599/1603–1661), an Irish Franciscan in exile, unorthodox Scotist and a skilled collaborator of the famous Luke Wadding, is interesting for his fresh and open-minded approach to traditional Scotist doctrines. His take on the theory of relations, which is the topic of this paper, is no exception. As I will show, in his Integer philosophiae cursus ad mentem Scoti1 he only pretends to be defending a doctrine considered to be traditionally “Scotist,” his true mind being apparently quite different.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
