Juri Sonowal, Mrinal Bhowmik, M. Palanisamy, R. Anandalakshmi
{"title":"真空管太阳能集热器不同管型的比较研究","authors":"Juri Sonowal, Mrinal Bhowmik, M. Palanisamy, R. Anandalakshmi","doi":"10.1115/1.4056904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study investigates the thermal performance of an evacuated U-tube solar collector (ETSC) using different tube geometrical configurations. The effect of tube geometry on overall collector efficiency is numerically analysed and compared with experimental results. Three different ETSC configurations made of copper viz., model 1 (M1) having one inlet and two outlets, model 2 (M2) having one inlet and three outlets, and model 3 (M3) having one inlet and four outlets are considered. An overall rise in temperature of heat transfer fluid at outlets for each model is predicted and compared with conventional U-tube (CT) for different mass flow rates and solar insolation to evaluate the collector performance. In comparison with the CT, the outlet temperature of the M3 and M1 is higher by 46.2 % and 40.3% respectively. M2 gives a nearly similar fluid outlet temperature as M1. A maximum of 35.4% enhancement in heat gain compared to the CT is observed for M3 (which is best among modified configurations) under similar operating conditions. However, at 788 W/m2 solar insolation and a constant mass flowrate of 0.0167 kg/s, the estimated thermal efficiency of M1 is higher among the three models which is 33.5% higher than the CT. The experimental results closely approximate the numerical predictions with a deviation of ±1.1°C . From the economic evaluation of the modified collectors, a minimum payback period of 2.5 years was observed for model 1 which is the shortest among the investigated ETSC systems.","PeriodicalId":17124,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Solar Energy Engineering-transactions of The Asme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Different Tube Geometries of Evacuated Tube Solar Collector\",\"authors\":\"Juri Sonowal, Mrinal Bhowmik, M. Palanisamy, R. Anandalakshmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4056904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study investigates the thermal performance of an evacuated U-tube solar collector (ETSC) using different tube geometrical configurations. The effect of tube geometry on overall collector efficiency is numerically analysed and compared with experimental results. Three different ETSC configurations made of copper viz., model 1 (M1) having one inlet and two outlets, model 2 (M2) having one inlet and three outlets, and model 3 (M3) having one inlet and four outlets are considered. An overall rise in temperature of heat transfer fluid at outlets for each model is predicted and compared with conventional U-tube (CT) for different mass flow rates and solar insolation to evaluate the collector performance. In comparison with the CT, the outlet temperature of the M3 and M1 is higher by 46.2 % and 40.3% respectively. M2 gives a nearly similar fluid outlet temperature as M1. A maximum of 35.4% enhancement in heat gain compared to the CT is observed for M3 (which is best among modified configurations) under similar operating conditions. However, at 788 W/m2 solar insolation and a constant mass flowrate of 0.0167 kg/s, the estimated thermal efficiency of M1 is higher among the three models which is 33.5% higher than the CT. The experimental results closely approximate the numerical predictions with a deviation of ±1.1°C . From the economic evaluation of the modified collectors, a minimum payback period of 2.5 years was observed for model 1 which is the shortest among the investigated ETSC systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Solar Energy Engineering-transactions of The Asme\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Solar Energy Engineering-transactions of The Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056904\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Solar Energy Engineering-transactions of The Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056904","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Study of Different Tube Geometries of Evacuated Tube Solar Collector
This study investigates the thermal performance of an evacuated U-tube solar collector (ETSC) using different tube geometrical configurations. The effect of tube geometry on overall collector efficiency is numerically analysed and compared with experimental results. Three different ETSC configurations made of copper viz., model 1 (M1) having one inlet and two outlets, model 2 (M2) having one inlet and three outlets, and model 3 (M3) having one inlet and four outlets are considered. An overall rise in temperature of heat transfer fluid at outlets for each model is predicted and compared with conventional U-tube (CT) for different mass flow rates and solar insolation to evaluate the collector performance. In comparison with the CT, the outlet temperature of the M3 and M1 is higher by 46.2 % and 40.3% respectively. M2 gives a nearly similar fluid outlet temperature as M1. A maximum of 35.4% enhancement in heat gain compared to the CT is observed for M3 (which is best among modified configurations) under similar operating conditions. However, at 788 W/m2 solar insolation and a constant mass flowrate of 0.0167 kg/s, the estimated thermal efficiency of M1 is higher among the three models which is 33.5% higher than the CT. The experimental results closely approximate the numerical predictions with a deviation of ±1.1°C . From the economic evaluation of the modified collectors, a minimum payback period of 2.5 years was observed for model 1 which is the shortest among the investigated ETSC systems.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Solar Energy Engineering - Including Wind Energy and Building Energy Conservation - publishes research papers that contain original work of permanent interest in all areas of solar energy and energy conservation, as well as discussions of policy and regulatory issues that affect renewable energy technologies and their implementation. Papers that do not include original work, but nonetheless present quality analysis or incremental improvements to past work may be published as Technical Briefs. Review papers are accepted but should be discussed with the Editor prior to submission. The Journal also publishes a section called Solar Scenery that features photographs or graphical displays of significant new installations or research facilities.