{"title":"可识别无形资产的实用主义新古典会计研究议程","authors":"B. Rutherford","doi":"10.1108/jaar-05-2022-0114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper offers a way of revivifying classical accounting research in the form of a pragmatist neoclassical programme with a sound epistemological underpinning.Design/methodology/approachThe paper draws on a pragmatist perspective on financial accounting and accounting research springing from John Dewey's theory of inquiry.FindingsAlthough a pragmatist underpinning does not entail specific methodological prescriptions, it can provide fruitful insights in research design. The paper discusses the structure and content of a research programme drawing on a pragmatist underpinning and sets out proposals for a practical research agenda. Although the agenda is shaped around the topic of identifiable intangibles, much of the paper has substantially wider relevance.Research limitations/implicationsThe approach justifies a revival in scholarly research employing classical methods and directed at improving accounting methods and standards.Practical implicationsThe approach would promote closer engagement between scholarly accounting and practitioners such as standard-setters, making some contribution to closing the widely acknowledged gap between research and practice.Originality/valueThe paper offers a neoclassical programme of research drawing considerably more extensively on pragmatist philosophy than did theorisation in the classical period.","PeriodicalId":46321,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Accounting Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pragmatist neoclassical accounting research agenda for identifiable intangibles\",\"authors\":\"B. Rutherford\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jaar-05-2022-0114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis paper offers a way of revivifying classical accounting research in the form of a pragmatist neoclassical programme with a sound epistemological underpinning.Design/methodology/approachThe paper draws on a pragmatist perspective on financial accounting and accounting research springing from John Dewey's theory of inquiry.FindingsAlthough a pragmatist underpinning does not entail specific methodological prescriptions, it can provide fruitful insights in research design. The paper discusses the structure and content of a research programme drawing on a pragmatist underpinning and sets out proposals for a practical research agenda. Although the agenda is shaped around the topic of identifiable intangibles, much of the paper has substantially wider relevance.Research limitations/implicationsThe approach justifies a revival in scholarly research employing classical methods and directed at improving accounting methods and standards.Practical implicationsThe approach would promote closer engagement between scholarly accounting and practitioners such as standard-setters, making some contribution to closing the widely acknowledged gap between research and practice.Originality/valueThe paper offers a neoclassical programme of research drawing considerably more extensively on pragmatist philosophy than did theorisation in the classical period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Accounting Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Accounting Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-05-2022-0114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-05-2022-0114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A pragmatist neoclassical accounting research agenda for identifiable intangibles
PurposeThis paper offers a way of revivifying classical accounting research in the form of a pragmatist neoclassical programme with a sound epistemological underpinning.Design/methodology/approachThe paper draws on a pragmatist perspective on financial accounting and accounting research springing from John Dewey's theory of inquiry.FindingsAlthough a pragmatist underpinning does not entail specific methodological prescriptions, it can provide fruitful insights in research design. The paper discusses the structure and content of a research programme drawing on a pragmatist underpinning and sets out proposals for a practical research agenda. Although the agenda is shaped around the topic of identifiable intangibles, much of the paper has substantially wider relevance.Research limitations/implicationsThe approach justifies a revival in scholarly research employing classical methods and directed at improving accounting methods and standards.Practical implicationsThe approach would promote closer engagement between scholarly accounting and practitioners such as standard-setters, making some contribution to closing the widely acknowledged gap between research and practice.Originality/valueThe paper offers a neoclassical programme of research drawing considerably more extensively on pragmatist philosophy than did theorisation in the classical period.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Accounting Research provides a forum for the publication of high quality manuscripts concerning issues relevant to the practice of accounting in a wide variety of contexts. The journal seeks to promote a research agenda that allows academics and practitioners to work together to provide sustainable outcomes in a practice setting. The journal is keen to encourage academic research articles which develop a forum for the discussion of real, practical problems and provide the expertise to allow solutions to these problems to be formed, while also contributing to our theoretical understanding of such issues.