连任对印度发展的影响:领先邦与落后邦的比较分析

IF 0.8 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Indian Growth and Development Review Pub Date : 2021-07-05 DOI:10.1108/igdr-11-2020-0156
B. S. Misra
{"title":"连任对印度发展的影响:领先邦与落后邦的比较分析","authors":"B. S. Misra","doi":"10.1108/igdr-11-2020-0156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to examine political accountability to the voter in India by studying re-election patterns in 14 major states categorized as leading and lagging during the period 1952–2015.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study has computed a state-wise re-election index by taking the ratio of the number of constituencies exhibiting re-election in four consecutive terms during 1952–1999 to the total number of constituencies in the state. The time-invariant re-election index as of the year 1999 is used to estimate the impact of the re-election on per capita state income during 2001–2015. This paper has used the correlated random effects estimation procedure that considers the state-specific unobserved factors while using a time-invariant regressor to ascertain the impact of re-election.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study finds that persistent re-election does not seem to lead to better development outcomes. When this study computes the re-election index by excluding constituencies that are underdeveloped both in the economic and social spheres, this paper finds the asymmetric impact of re-election for the leading and the lagging states. The findings suggest that historical institutions in the laggings states could be driving the empirical results. The empirical findings are corroborated by the relatively poor availability of basic amenities in constituencies exhibiting persistent re-election when compared to the state average.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings suggest that the provision of re-election without term limits may need to be revisited in the lagging states for better political accountability.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nFirst, the authors study the pattern of constituency-wise re-election to compute state-wise re-election index to capture persistent re-election. Second, the authors assess the development status of a constituency by mapping it to the development indicators of the district in which the constituency is located. This paper considers both economic as well social indicators of development. Third, the time-invariant nature of the re-election index helps to address reverse causality while studying the impact of re-election on development. Fourth, the authors use a novel econometric methodology to study the impact of the re-election on development given the time-invariant characteristic of the re-election index.\n","PeriodicalId":42861,"journal":{"name":"Indian Growth and Development Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of re-election on development in India: a comparative analysis of leading and lagging states\",\"authors\":\"B. S. Misra\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/igdr-11-2020-0156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to examine political accountability to the voter in India by studying re-election patterns in 14 major states categorized as leading and lagging during the period 1952–2015.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study has computed a state-wise re-election index by taking the ratio of the number of constituencies exhibiting re-election in four consecutive terms during 1952–1999 to the total number of constituencies in the state. The time-invariant re-election index as of the year 1999 is used to estimate the impact of the re-election on per capita state income during 2001–2015. This paper has used the correlated random effects estimation procedure that considers the state-specific unobserved factors while using a time-invariant regressor to ascertain the impact of re-election.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis study finds that persistent re-election does not seem to lead to better development outcomes. When this study computes the re-election index by excluding constituencies that are underdeveloped both in the economic and social spheres, this paper finds the asymmetric impact of re-election for the leading and the lagging states. The findings suggest that historical institutions in the laggings states could be driving the empirical results. The empirical findings are corroborated by the relatively poor availability of basic amenities in constituencies exhibiting persistent re-election when compared to the state average.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe findings suggest that the provision of re-election without term limits may need to be revisited in the lagging states for better political accountability.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nFirst, the authors study the pattern of constituency-wise re-election to compute state-wise re-election index to capture persistent re-election. Second, the authors assess the development status of a constituency by mapping it to the development indicators of the district in which the constituency is located. This paper considers both economic as well social indicators of development. Third, the time-invariant nature of the re-election index helps to address reverse causality while studying the impact of re-election on development. Fourth, the authors use a novel econometric methodology to study the impact of the re-election on development given the time-invariant characteristic of the re-election index.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":42861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Growth and Development Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Growth and Development Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/igdr-11-2020-0156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Growth and Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/igdr-11-2020-0156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本文的目的是通过研究1952年至2015年期间14个主要邦的连任模式来检验印度选民的政治责任。设计/方法/方法本研究通过计算连续四届连任的选区数量的比率来计算各州的连任指数1952年至1999年期间,该州的选区总数。截至1999年的时不变连任指数用于估计2001-2005年连任对人均州收入的影响。本文使用了相关随机效应估计程序,该程序考虑了特定状态的未观察因素,同时使用时不变回归器来确定重新选择的影响。结果本研究发现,持续的重新选择似乎不会带来更好的发展结果。当本研究通过排除经济和社会领域不发达的选区来计算连任指数时,本文发现连任对领先州和落后州的影响是不对称的。研究结果表明,落后州的历史制度可能推动了实证结果。与州平均水平相比,持续连任的选区的基本设施相对较差,这证实了实证结果。实际含义研究结果表明,在落后的州,可能需要重新考虑无任期限制的连任条款,以更好地承担政治责任。原创性/价值首先,作者研究了选区连任的模式,以计算州连任指数来捕捉持续连任。其次,作者通过将选区与选区所在地区的发展指标进行映射来评估选区的发展状况。本文同时考虑了经济和社会发展指标。第三,在研究连任对发展的影响时,连任指数的时间不变性质有助于解决反向因果关系。第四,在重新选举指数具有时不变特征的情况下,作者采用一种新的计量经济学方法研究了重新选举对发展的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of re-election on development in India: a comparative analysis of leading and lagging states
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine political accountability to the voter in India by studying re-election patterns in 14 major states categorized as leading and lagging during the period 1952–2015. Design/methodology/approach This study has computed a state-wise re-election index by taking the ratio of the number of constituencies exhibiting re-election in four consecutive terms during 1952–1999 to the total number of constituencies in the state. The time-invariant re-election index as of the year 1999 is used to estimate the impact of the re-election on per capita state income during 2001–2015. This paper has used the correlated random effects estimation procedure that considers the state-specific unobserved factors while using a time-invariant regressor to ascertain the impact of re-election. Findings This study finds that persistent re-election does not seem to lead to better development outcomes. When this study computes the re-election index by excluding constituencies that are underdeveloped both in the economic and social spheres, this paper finds the asymmetric impact of re-election for the leading and the lagging states. The findings suggest that historical institutions in the laggings states could be driving the empirical results. The empirical findings are corroborated by the relatively poor availability of basic amenities in constituencies exhibiting persistent re-election when compared to the state average. Practical implications The findings suggest that the provision of re-election without term limits may need to be revisited in the lagging states for better political accountability. Originality/value First, the authors study the pattern of constituency-wise re-election to compute state-wise re-election index to capture persistent re-election. Second, the authors assess the development status of a constituency by mapping it to the development indicators of the district in which the constituency is located. This paper considers both economic as well social indicators of development. Third, the time-invariant nature of the re-election index helps to address reverse causality while studying the impact of re-election on development. Fourth, the authors use a novel econometric methodology to study the impact of the re-election on development given the time-invariant characteristic of the re-election index.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Resilience of the group lending model to a COVID-19 induced shock: evidence from an Indian microfinance fund Sociodemographic and institutional factors as determinants of access to food among rural households during COVID-19 pandemic in India Structural transformation of the Indian states: heterogeneity among them in a ten-sector economy Are we measuring the SDGs progress right? Evidence and insights from a review of India’s SDG index What explains exit in Indian manufacturing industries?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1