技术与后资本主义:对反工作、全自动化幻想的批判性评价

Q3 Social Sciences Studies in Political Economy Pub Date : 2022-09-02 DOI:10.1080/07078552.2022.2161229
Ingrid Hanon
{"title":"技术与后资本主义:对反工作、全自动化幻想的批判性评价","authors":"Ingrid Hanon","doi":"10.1080/07078552.2022.2161229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper challenges antiwork techno-utopias praising the supposedly liberating potential of capital productive forces and advocating for an accelerated expansion of labour-saving technologies before implementing a postcapitalist world built upon such technological development. The premises of those technoreveries are thus inspected along with the dangers and limitations of their implementation. Marx's view of productive forces is also examined, and some reflections are offered on the fettering thesis and the socialist goal of human enhancement.","PeriodicalId":39831,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Political Economy","volume":"103 1","pages":"241 - 261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology and postcapitalism: a critical appraisal of antiwork, full automation reveries\",\"authors\":\"Ingrid Hanon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07078552.2022.2161229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper challenges antiwork techno-utopias praising the supposedly liberating potential of capital productive forces and advocating for an accelerated expansion of labour-saving technologies before implementing a postcapitalist world built upon such technological development. The premises of those technoreveries are thus inspected along with the dangers and limitations of their implementation. Marx's view of productive forces is also examined, and some reflections are offered on the fettering thesis and the socialist goal of human enhancement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"241 - 261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2022.2161229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2022.2161229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文挑战了反劳动技术乌托邦,他们赞扬所谓的资本生产力的解放潜力,并主张在实施建立在这种技术发展基础上的后资本主义世界之前,加快扩大节省劳动力的技术。因此,对这些技术幻想的前提及其实施的危险和局限性进行了检查。对马克思的生产力观进行了考察,并对其束缚论和人的进步的社会主义目标进行了思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Technology and postcapitalism: a critical appraisal of antiwork, full automation reveries
Abstract This paper challenges antiwork techno-utopias praising the supposedly liberating potential of capital productive forces and advocating for an accelerated expansion of labour-saving technologies before implementing a postcapitalist world built upon such technological development. The premises of those technoreveries are thus inspected along with the dangers and limitations of their implementation. Marx's view of productive forces is also examined, and some reflections are offered on the fettering thesis and the socialist goal of human enhancement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Political Economy
Studies in Political Economy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Studies in Political Economy is an interdisciplinary journal committed to the publication of original work in the various traditions of socialist political economy. Researchers and analysts within these traditions seek to understand how political, economic and cultural processes and struggles interact to shape and reshape the conditions of people"s lives.
期刊最新文献
Critical engagements with “Climate Change as Class War”—concepts of class Critical engagements with “Climate Change as Class War”—the climate, public power, and the means of social reproduction Critical engagements with “Climate Change as Class War”—proletarian ecology, environmental provision, and the welfare of children as a public good Critical engagements with “Climate Change as Class War”—staying in the ring Critical engagements with “Climate Change as Class War”—towards a politics of better
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1