手术治疗无并发症的毛鞘疾病:越简单越好

Clara Tellez MD , Miguel Pera MD, PhD
{"title":"手术治疗无并发症的毛鞘疾病:越简单越好","authors":"Clara Tellez MD ,&nbsp;Miguel Pera MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.scrs.2022.100912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Chronic pilonidal disease<span> continues to be a therapeutic challenge. Discrepancies in technique, recurrence rates, complications, time to return to work/school, and patient's aesthetic satisfaction between the various treatment options have led to controversy over the best approach. It is undeniable that the best technique should strike a balance between recurrence and surgical morbidity. Despite the plethora of various complex surgical options, it seems that one of the oldest and simplest methods such as </span></span>incision and </span>curettage can balance the various desirable outcomes without excessive morbidity. In this manuscript, we review the literature and the evidence supporting this surgical procedure. We conclude that incision and curettage should be considered as the initial option for most patients with chronic uncomplicated pilonidal disease, and that more complex surgical options should be reserved for severe and recurrent cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55956,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery","volume":"33 4","pages":"Article 100912"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgery for uncomplicated pilonidal disease: simpler is better\",\"authors\":\"Clara Tellez MD ,&nbsp;Miguel Pera MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scrs.2022.100912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Chronic pilonidal disease<span> continues to be a therapeutic challenge. Discrepancies in technique, recurrence rates, complications, time to return to work/school, and patient's aesthetic satisfaction between the various treatment options have led to controversy over the best approach. It is undeniable that the best technique should strike a balance between recurrence and surgical morbidity. Despite the plethora of various complex surgical options, it seems that one of the oldest and simplest methods such as </span></span>incision and </span>curettage can balance the various desirable outcomes without excessive morbidity. In this manuscript, we review the literature and the evidence supporting this surgical procedure. We conclude that incision and curettage should be considered as the initial option for most patients with chronic uncomplicated pilonidal disease, and that more complex surgical options should be reserved for severe and recurrent cases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100912\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043148922000537\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043148922000537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性毛囊病仍然是治疗上的挑战。不同的治疗方案在技术、复发率、并发症、重返工作/学校的时间以及患者的审美满意度等方面的差异导致了对最佳治疗方法的争论。不可否认的是,最好的技术应该在复发和手术发病率之间取得平衡。尽管有各种各样复杂的手术选择,但似乎最古老和最简单的方法之一,如切开和刮除,可以平衡各种理想的结果,而不会造成过多的发病率。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了文献和证据支持这种外科手术。我们的结论是,对于大多数慢性无并发症的毛鞘疾病患者,应考虑将切口和刮除作为初始选择,对于严重和复发的病例,应保留更复杂的手术选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Surgery for uncomplicated pilonidal disease: simpler is better

Chronic pilonidal disease continues to be a therapeutic challenge. Discrepancies in technique, recurrence rates, complications, time to return to work/school, and patient's aesthetic satisfaction between the various treatment options have led to controversy over the best approach. It is undeniable that the best technique should strike a balance between recurrence and surgical morbidity. Despite the plethora of various complex surgical options, it seems that one of the oldest and simplest methods such as incision and curettage can balance the various desirable outcomes without excessive morbidity. In this manuscript, we review the literature and the evidence supporting this surgical procedure. We conclude that incision and curettage should be considered as the initial option for most patients with chronic uncomplicated pilonidal disease, and that more complex surgical options should be reserved for severe and recurrent cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery offers a comprehensive and coordinated review of a single, timely topic related to the diagnosis and treatment of proctologic diseases. Each issue is an organized compendium of practical information that serves as a lasting reference for colorectal surgeons, general surgeons, surgeons in training and their colleagues in medicine with an interest in colorectal disorders.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Introduction Consilience of healthcare legislation, complexity science & computational analysis Artificial intelligence for the colorectal surgeon in 2024 – A narrative review of Prevalence, Policies, and (needed) Protections The impact of federally legislated colon and rectal cancer screening programs and policy in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1