权威、真实性与冷战地区研究的认知遗产

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY Aspasia Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.3167/asp.2023.170103
Kristen Ghodsee, Agnieszka Mrozik
{"title":"权威、真实性与冷战地区研究的认知遗产","authors":"Kristen Ghodsee, Agnieszka Mrozik","doi":"10.3167/asp.2023.170103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article examines the history of knowledge production about the former Eastern Bloc in the American and Polish academic contexts. It explores how debates about authority and authenticity are embedded in the deeper histories of area studies and in long-standing conflicts dating from the earliest years of the field of Slavic and East European Studies. The discussion about authority and authenticity within feminist circles mirrors larger conflicts between proponents of the totalitarian thesis and the so-called revisionists. The conflicts between these two schools precipitated a continuing epistemic crisis that also infects the academic cultures of Eastern Europe and is exacerbated by the neoliberalization of academic knowledge production. The epistemic cultures perpetuating Cold War stereotypes may lead to self-censorship or dissuade young researchers from studying the gendered aspects of lived experience in the communist era.","PeriodicalId":41373,"journal":{"name":"Aspasia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Authority, Authenticity, and the Epistemic Legacies of Cold War Area Studies\",\"authors\":\"Kristen Ghodsee, Agnieszka Mrozik\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/asp.2023.170103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis article examines the history of knowledge production about the former Eastern Bloc in the American and Polish academic contexts. It explores how debates about authority and authenticity are embedded in the deeper histories of area studies and in long-standing conflicts dating from the earliest years of the field of Slavic and East European Studies. The discussion about authority and authenticity within feminist circles mirrors larger conflicts between proponents of the totalitarian thesis and the so-called revisionists. The conflicts between these two schools precipitated a continuing epistemic crisis that also infects the academic cultures of Eastern Europe and is exacerbated by the neoliberalization of academic knowledge production. The epistemic cultures perpetuating Cold War stereotypes may lead to self-censorship or dissuade young researchers from studying the gendered aspects of lived experience in the communist era.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aspasia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aspasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/asp.2023.170103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aspasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/asp.2023.170103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了在美国和波兰的学术背景下关于前东欧集团的知识生产的历史。它探讨了关于权威和真实性的争论是如何嵌入到区域研究的更深层次的历史中,以及从斯拉夫和东欧研究领域的早期开始的长期冲突中。女权主义圈子内关于权威和真实性的讨论反映了极权主义论点的支持者和所谓的修正主义者之间更大的冲突。这两个学派之间的冲突引发了一场持续不断的认知危机,这种危机也感染了东欧的学术文化,并因学术知识生产的新自由主义化而加剧。延续冷战刻板印象的认知文化可能会导致自我审查或阻止年轻研究人员研究共产主义时代生活经验的性别方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Authority, Authenticity, and the Epistemic Legacies of Cold War Area Studies
This article examines the history of knowledge production about the former Eastern Bloc in the American and Polish academic contexts. It explores how debates about authority and authenticity are embedded in the deeper histories of area studies and in long-standing conflicts dating from the earliest years of the field of Slavic and East European Studies. The discussion about authority and authenticity within feminist circles mirrors larger conflicts between proponents of the totalitarian thesis and the so-called revisionists. The conflicts between these two schools precipitated a continuing epistemic crisis that also infects the academic cultures of Eastern Europe and is exacerbated by the neoliberalization of academic knowledge production. The epistemic cultures perpetuating Cold War stereotypes may lead to self-censorship or dissuade young researchers from studying the gendered aspects of lived experience in the communist era.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aspasia
Aspasia HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Authority, Authenticity, and the Epistemic Legacies of Cold War Area Studies Between Holy Church and Holy Human Rights The Social-Legal Rights and Political Activity of Albanian Women in the Late Middle Ages (Thirteenth–Fifteenth Centuries) Book Reviews There Is Always Something New to Discover
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1