德国能源转型不同阶段分散式电力市场的模型评价

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5547/2160-5890.11.1.drit
David Ritter, Christoph Heinemann, D. Bauknecht, Christian Winger, Franziska Flachsbarth
{"title":"德国能源转型不同阶段分散式电力市场的模型评价","authors":"David Ritter, Christoph Heinemann, D. Bauknecht, Christian Winger, Franziska Flachsbarth","doi":"10.5547/2160-5890.11.1.drit","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis is based on reviewing the following indicators that are derived from a model-based scenario analysis: CO 2 emissions of electricity generation; regional levels of self-supply with electricity; variable costs of electricity generation; grid congestion and grid expansion needs. The research question is twofold. Firstly, how does the size of decentralised markets affect the indicators mentioned. Secondly, which effects on these indicators can be observed if only power plants of a certain size or technology are allowed to take part in the decentralised markets.The analysis focuses on a system perspective and does not include effects on individual market players. In addition, it focuses on the electricity system with only some interactions with the heating or mobility sectors. The modelling work looks at the effects within the boundaries of a predefined scenario and for two scenario years. Dynamic effects such as a possible effect of decentralised markets on the overall deployment of RES-E technologies or storage systems is therefore not part of the analysis. The results are valid for the German electricity system and cannot necessarily be transferred to other countries or electricity systems with e.g. a weaker electricity grid or less interconnection to neighbouring countries.","PeriodicalId":45808,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model-Based Evaluation of Decentralised Electricity Markets at Different Phases of the German Energy Transition\",\"authors\":\"David Ritter, Christoph Heinemann, D. Bauknecht, Christian Winger, Franziska Flachsbarth\",\"doi\":\"10.5547/2160-5890.11.1.drit\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The analysis is based on reviewing the following indicators that are derived from a model-based scenario analysis: CO 2 emissions of electricity generation; regional levels of self-supply with electricity; variable costs of electricity generation; grid congestion and grid expansion needs. The research question is twofold. Firstly, how does the size of decentralised markets affect the indicators mentioned. Secondly, which effects on these indicators can be observed if only power plants of a certain size or technology are allowed to take part in the decentralised markets.The analysis focuses on a system perspective and does not include effects on individual market players. In addition, it focuses on the electricity system with only some interactions with the heating or mobility sectors. The modelling work looks at the effects within the boundaries of a predefined scenario and for two scenario years. Dynamic effects such as a possible effect of decentralised markets on the overall deployment of RES-E technologies or storage systems is therefore not part of the analysis. The results are valid for the German electricity system and cannot necessarily be transferred to other countries or electricity systems with e.g. a weaker electricity grid or less interconnection to neighbouring countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.11.1.drit\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.11.1.drit","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项分析是根据审查下列从基于模型的情景分析得出的指标进行的:发电的二氧化碳排放量;区域电力自给水平;发电可变成本;电网拥塞和电网扩张需求。研究的问题是双重的。首先,去中心化市场的规模如何影响上述指标。其次,如果只允许一定规模或技术的发电厂参与分散市场,可以观察到对这些指标的影响。该分析侧重于系统视角,不包括对单个市场参与者的影响。此外,它侧重于电力系统,仅与供暖或交通部门有一些互动。建模工作着眼于在一个预先确定的情景和两个情景年范围内的影响。因此,诸如分散市场对RES-E技术或存储系统整体部署的可能影响之类的动态影响不在分析范围之内。研究结果对德国电力系统是有效的,不一定适用于其他国家或电网较弱或与邻国互连较少的电力系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Model-Based Evaluation of Decentralised Electricity Markets at Different Phases of the German Energy Transition
The analysis is based on reviewing the following indicators that are derived from a model-based scenario analysis: CO 2 emissions of electricity generation; regional levels of self-supply with electricity; variable costs of electricity generation; grid congestion and grid expansion needs. The research question is twofold. Firstly, how does the size of decentralised markets affect the indicators mentioned. Secondly, which effects on these indicators can be observed if only power plants of a certain size or technology are allowed to take part in the decentralised markets.The analysis focuses on a system perspective and does not include effects on individual market players. In addition, it focuses on the electricity system with only some interactions with the heating or mobility sectors. The modelling work looks at the effects within the boundaries of a predefined scenario and for two scenario years. Dynamic effects such as a possible effect of decentralised markets on the overall deployment of RES-E technologies or storage systems is therefore not part of the analysis. The results are valid for the German electricity system and cannot necessarily be transferred to other countries or electricity systems with e.g. a weaker electricity grid or less interconnection to neighbouring countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Energy Network Innovation for Green Transition: Economic Issues and Regulatory Options Model-Based Evaluation of Decentralised Electricity Markets at Different Phases of the German Energy Transition Socio-technical Inertia: Understanding the Barriers to Distributed Generation in Pakistan Residential Welfare-Loss from Electricity Supply Interruptions in South Africa: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Distributed Energy Resource Subsidy Programs Cost Efficiency Evaluation of Thermal Power Plants in Bangladesh Using a Two-Stage DEA Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1