动脉粥样硬化神经成像生物标志物在急性大血管闭塞中的外部验证

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI:10.1161/svin.123.000850
F. Siddiqui, J. Fletcher, Andrew V. Barnes, Alayna N. Henry, A. Elias, G. Rajah, Alexis Carroll PA‐C, S. Dandapat, K. Ume, M. Farooqui, A. Rodriguez-Calienes, A. Pandey, S. Ortega‐Gutierrez
{"title":"动脉粥样硬化神经成像生物标志物在急性大血管闭塞中的外部验证","authors":"F. Siddiqui, J. Fletcher, Andrew V. Barnes, Alayna N. Henry, A. Elias, G. Rajah, Alexis Carroll PA‐C, S. Dandapat, K. Ume, M. Farooqui, A. Rodriguez-Calienes, A. Pandey, S. Ortega‐Gutierrez","doi":"10.1161/svin.123.000850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Intracranial atherosclerosis related large vessel occlusion (ICAS‐LVO) is the major cause of failed mechanical thrombectomy. ICAS‐LVO causes reocclusion or a fixed focal stenosis, leading to suboptimal revascularization and poor functional outcomes. We aimed to externally validate 4 preidentified imaging biomarkers of ICAS‐LVO: absent hyperdense sign, Hounsfield units (Hu ratio ≤1.1 and Delta Hu <6) and truncal‐type occlusion, observed on admission noncontrast computed tomography and computed tomography angiography in patients presenting with emergent large‐vessel occlusion (ELVO).\n \n \n \n We conducted a retrospective cohort observational study of consecutive patients presenting with acute M1/terminal internal carotid artery occlusions undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. Inability to locate a hyperdense vessel on noncontrast computed tomography at the corresponding ELVO on computed tomography angiography was labeled absent hyperdense sign. Delta Hu and Hu ratio were defined as the difference and ratio of the Hu of the ELVO on noncontrast computed tomography and its mirror contralateral patent vessel, respectively. ELVO was classified as truncal‐type occlusion if the bifurcation distal to the occlusion was spared on computed tomography angiography. ICAS‐LVO was defined as the presence of fixed focal stenosis or reocclusion after mechanical thrombectomy. Statistical analysis was performed using C statistics, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and multivariate logistic regression.\n \n \n \n \n Of 161 patients, 30 (18.6%) had suspected ICAS‐LVO. Absent hyperdense sign had a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 87% (area under the curve [AUC], 0.88), in predicting ICAS‐LVO. Hu ratio ≤1.1 (AUC, 0.89) and Delta Hu <6 (AUC, 0.96) had sensitivity of 100% and 97% and specificity of 79% and 95%, respectively. Truncal‐type occlusion showed a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 98% (AUC, 0.87). When comparing receiver operating characteristic AUC, Delta Hu <6 was significantly better than absent hyperdense sign (\n P\n =0.006); Hu ratio ≤1.1 (\n P\n =0.006); and truncal‐type occlusion (\n P\n =0.02).\n \n \n \n \n Combination of neuroimaging biomarkers using noncontrast computed tomography and computed tomography angiography in ELVO identify ICAS‐LVO with high predictive power. Larger, prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to further evaluate their effectiveness in diagnosing ICAS‐LVO.\n","PeriodicalId":74875,"journal":{"name":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External Validation of Atherosclerotic Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Emergent Large‐Vessel Occlusion\",\"authors\":\"F. Siddiqui, J. Fletcher, Andrew V. Barnes, Alayna N. Henry, A. Elias, G. Rajah, Alexis Carroll PA‐C, S. Dandapat, K. Ume, M. Farooqui, A. Rodriguez-Calienes, A. Pandey, S. Ortega‐Gutierrez\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/svin.123.000850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Intracranial atherosclerosis related large vessel occlusion (ICAS‐LVO) is the major cause of failed mechanical thrombectomy. ICAS‐LVO causes reocclusion or a fixed focal stenosis, leading to suboptimal revascularization and poor functional outcomes. We aimed to externally validate 4 preidentified imaging biomarkers of ICAS‐LVO: absent hyperdense sign, Hounsfield units (Hu ratio ≤1.1 and Delta Hu <6) and truncal‐type occlusion, observed on admission noncontrast computed tomography and computed tomography angiography in patients presenting with emergent large‐vessel occlusion (ELVO).\\n \\n \\n \\n We conducted a retrospective cohort observational study of consecutive patients presenting with acute M1/terminal internal carotid artery occlusions undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. Inability to locate a hyperdense vessel on noncontrast computed tomography at the corresponding ELVO on computed tomography angiography was labeled absent hyperdense sign. Delta Hu and Hu ratio were defined as the difference and ratio of the Hu of the ELVO on noncontrast computed tomography and its mirror contralateral patent vessel, respectively. ELVO was classified as truncal‐type occlusion if the bifurcation distal to the occlusion was spared on computed tomography angiography. ICAS‐LVO was defined as the presence of fixed focal stenosis or reocclusion after mechanical thrombectomy. Statistical analysis was performed using C statistics, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and multivariate logistic regression.\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n Of 161 patients, 30 (18.6%) had suspected ICAS‐LVO. Absent hyperdense sign had a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 87% (area under the curve [AUC], 0.88), in predicting ICAS‐LVO. Hu ratio ≤1.1 (AUC, 0.89) and Delta Hu <6 (AUC, 0.96) had sensitivity of 100% and 97% and specificity of 79% and 95%, respectively. Truncal‐type occlusion showed a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 98% (AUC, 0.87). When comparing receiver operating characteristic AUC, Delta Hu <6 was significantly better than absent hyperdense sign (\\n P\\n =0.006); Hu ratio ≤1.1 (\\n P\\n =0.006); and truncal‐type occlusion (\\n P\\n =0.02).\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n Combination of neuroimaging biomarkers using noncontrast computed tomography and computed tomography angiography in ELVO identify ICAS‐LVO with high predictive power. Larger, prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to further evaluate their effectiveness in diagnosing ICAS‐LVO.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":74875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.123.000850\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.123.000850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颅内动脉粥样硬化相关性大血管闭塞(ICAS - LVO)是机械取栓失败的主要原因。ICAS - LVO导致再闭塞或固定局灶性狭窄,导致亚理想的血运重建和不良的功能预后。我们旨在从外部验证ICAS - LVO的4个预先识别的成像生物标志物:无高密度征,Hounsfield单位(Hu比≤1.1和Delta Hu <6)和截骨型闭塞,这些在入院时出现紧急大血管闭塞(ELVO)的患者的非对比计算机断层扫描和计算机断层血管造影中观察到。我们对连续出现急性M1/终末颈内动脉闭塞并接受机械取栓术的患者进行了回顾性队列观察研究。在非对比计算机断层扫描上无法在相应的ELVO处定位高密度血管,标记为无高密度征象。Delta Hu和Hu比值分别定义为ELVO在非对比计算机断层扫描上与其镜像对侧未闭血管上的Hu差值和比值。如果在计算机断层血管造影中未发现远端分叉,ELVO被归类为截断型闭塞。ICAS‐LVO定义为机械取栓后存在固定局灶性狭窄或再闭塞。采用C统计、受试者工作特征曲线分析、多因素logistic回归进行统计学分析。161例患者中,30例(18.6%)疑似ICAS - LVO。无高密度征象预测ICAS - LVO的敏感性为90%,特异性为87%(曲线下面积[AUC], 0.88)。Hu比值≤1.1 (AUC, 0.89)和δ Hu <6 (AUC, 0.96)的敏感性分别为100%和97%,特异性分别为79%和95%。截断型闭塞的敏感性为75%,特异性为98% (AUC, 0.87)。比较受试者工作特征AUC时,δ Hu <6显著优于无高密度征(P =0.006);Hu比≤1.1 (P =0.006);截断型闭塞(P =0.02)。结合使用非对比计算机断层扫描和计算机断层血管成像的神经成像生物标志物,在ELVO中识别ICAS‐LVO具有很高的预测能力。更大的、前瞻性的、多中心的研究是必要的,以进一步评估其在诊断ICAS - LVO中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
External Validation of Atherosclerotic Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Emergent Large‐Vessel Occlusion
Intracranial atherosclerosis related large vessel occlusion (ICAS‐LVO) is the major cause of failed mechanical thrombectomy. ICAS‐LVO causes reocclusion or a fixed focal stenosis, leading to suboptimal revascularization and poor functional outcomes. We aimed to externally validate 4 preidentified imaging biomarkers of ICAS‐LVO: absent hyperdense sign, Hounsfield units (Hu ratio ≤1.1 and Delta Hu <6) and truncal‐type occlusion, observed on admission noncontrast computed tomography and computed tomography angiography in patients presenting with emergent large‐vessel occlusion (ELVO). We conducted a retrospective cohort observational study of consecutive patients presenting with acute M1/terminal internal carotid artery occlusions undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. Inability to locate a hyperdense vessel on noncontrast computed tomography at the corresponding ELVO on computed tomography angiography was labeled absent hyperdense sign. Delta Hu and Hu ratio were defined as the difference and ratio of the Hu of the ELVO on noncontrast computed tomography and its mirror contralateral patent vessel, respectively. ELVO was classified as truncal‐type occlusion if the bifurcation distal to the occlusion was spared on computed tomography angiography. ICAS‐LVO was defined as the presence of fixed focal stenosis or reocclusion after mechanical thrombectomy. Statistical analysis was performed using C statistics, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and multivariate logistic regression. Of 161 patients, 30 (18.6%) had suspected ICAS‐LVO. Absent hyperdense sign had a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 87% (area under the curve [AUC], 0.88), in predicting ICAS‐LVO. Hu ratio ≤1.1 (AUC, 0.89) and Delta Hu <6 (AUC, 0.96) had sensitivity of 100% and 97% and specificity of 79% and 95%, respectively. Truncal‐type occlusion showed a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 98% (AUC, 0.87). When comparing receiver operating characteristic AUC, Delta Hu <6 was significantly better than absent hyperdense sign ( P =0.006); Hu ratio ≤1.1 ( P =0.006); and truncal‐type occlusion ( P =0.02). Combination of neuroimaging biomarkers using noncontrast computed tomography and computed tomography angiography in ELVO identify ICAS‐LVO with high predictive power. Larger, prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to further evaluate their effectiveness in diagnosing ICAS‐LVO.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of HEmorrhage on CT versus MRI After ThrombEctomy: The HECATE study. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endovascular Therapy Effectiveness for Unruptured Saccular Intracranial Aneurysms. Large, Wide-Neck, Side-Wall Aneurysm Treatment in Canines Using NeuroCURE: A Novel Liquid Embolic. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual CLOTS Meeting: CLOTS 7.0, Madrid, Spain Catching Up With Time: Endovascular Treatment Beyond 24 Hours
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1