社区获得性肺炎:给还是不给糖皮质激素?

S. Pagliuca, D. Zappetti
{"title":"社区获得性肺炎:给还是不给糖皮质激素?","authors":"S. Pagliuca, D. Zappetti","doi":"10.1097/CPM.0000000000000337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Synopsis: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses have shown improved outcomes when using corticosteroids in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), including shorter length of stay, reduced treatment failure, and even lower mortality rates in severe disease. In this reviewed study, a bundled intervention including corticosteroids did not improve outcomes and suggested that corticosteroids may even cause harm. Source: Lloyd M, Karahalios A, Janus E, et al. Effectiveness of a bundled intervention including corticosteroids on outcomes of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:1052–1060.","PeriodicalId":10393,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":"197 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/CPM.0000000000000337","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corticosteroids in Community-acquired Pneumonia: To Give or Not To Give?\",\"authors\":\"S. Pagliuca, D. Zappetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CPM.0000000000000337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Synopsis: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses have shown improved outcomes when using corticosteroids in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), including shorter length of stay, reduced treatment failure, and even lower mortality rates in severe disease. In this reviewed study, a bundled intervention including corticosteroids did not improve outcomes and suggested that corticosteroids may even cause harm. Source: Lloyd M, Karahalios A, Janus E, et al. Effectiveness of a bundled intervention including corticosteroids on outcomes of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:1052–1060.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"197 - 197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/CPM.0000000000000337\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CPM.0000000000000337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CPM.0000000000000337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:几项随机对照试验(RCTs)和荟萃分析显示,在社区获得性肺炎(CAP)中使用皮质类固醇可改善预后,包括缩短住院时间,减少治疗失败,甚至降低重症患者的死亡率。在本综述的研究中,包括皮质类固醇在内的捆绑干预并没有改善结果,甚至表明皮质类固醇可能会造成伤害。资料来源:Lloyd M, Karahalios A, Janus E等。包括皮质类固醇在内的捆绑干预对社区获得性肺炎住院患者结局的有效性美国医学杂志,2019;179:1052-1060。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corticosteroids in Community-acquired Pneumonia: To Give or Not To Give?
Synopsis: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses have shown improved outcomes when using corticosteroids in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), including shorter length of stay, reduced treatment failure, and even lower mortality rates in severe disease. In this reviewed study, a bundled intervention including corticosteroids did not improve outcomes and suggested that corticosteroids may even cause harm. Source: Lloyd M, Karahalios A, Janus E, et al. Effectiveness of a bundled intervention including corticosteroids on outcomes of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:1052–1060.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
Clinical Pulmonary Medicine Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Pulmonary Medicine provides a forum for the discussion of important new knowledge in the field of pulmonary medicine that is of interest and relevance to the practitioner. This goal is achieved through mini-reviews on focused sub-specialty topics in areas covered within the journal. These areas include: Obstructive Airways Disease; Respiratory Infections; Interstitial, Inflammatory, and Occupational Diseases; Clinical Practice Management; Critical Care/Respiratory Care; Colleagues in Respiratory Medicine; and Topics in Respiratory Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Systemic sclerosis associated myopathy: how to treat. Axillary lymphadenopathy in a high-risk breast screening patient following the COVID-19 vaccine: a diagnostic conundrum. Is a Trial of Observation Safer Than Intervention With Spontaneous Pneumothorax? The Complex Relationship Between Poor Sleep Quality and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease The Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis and the Role of Lung Biopsy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1