{"title":"暴露伤口:Joseph Cundall和Robert Howlett的皇家任务","authors":"Rachel Bates","doi":"10.1080/23337486.2019.1631727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores Joseph Cundall and Robert Howlett’s little-known photographs of wounded soldiers taken during the Crimean War (1854–1856). These images are an important source in the history of war representation, following Charles Bell’s vivid paintings of gunshot wounds in the wake of the Battle of Waterloo and preceding World War One images of facial mutilation. Commissioned by Queen Victoria during her publicized visits to military hospitals at Chatham and kept for posterity in a royal album entitled ‘Crimean Portraits 1854–6ʹ, Cundall and Howlett’s photographs reveal the monarchy’s close interest in the wounded. I explore royal motives for memorializing rank and file soldiers and their injuries, arguing that the images are shaped by humanitarian and medical interests, as well as royal desire to commemorate survival and bodily resilience. I consider the photographs alongside contemporary reports and prints in newspapers and medical journals depicting the wounded, to give a sense of the cultural significance of the wounded soldier during the Crimean War. By situating Cundall and Howlett’s photographs against the political and emotional conflicts of the war and examining the representation of the individual sufferer, I ask to what extent they participate in, and challenge, wider narratives of healing.","PeriodicalId":37527,"journal":{"name":"Critical Military Studies","volume":"6 1","pages":"118 - 139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337486.2019.1631727","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exposing wounds: Joseph Cundall and Robert Howlett’s royal assignment\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Bates\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23337486.2019.1631727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article explores Joseph Cundall and Robert Howlett’s little-known photographs of wounded soldiers taken during the Crimean War (1854–1856). These images are an important source in the history of war representation, following Charles Bell’s vivid paintings of gunshot wounds in the wake of the Battle of Waterloo and preceding World War One images of facial mutilation. Commissioned by Queen Victoria during her publicized visits to military hospitals at Chatham and kept for posterity in a royal album entitled ‘Crimean Portraits 1854–6ʹ, Cundall and Howlett’s photographs reveal the monarchy’s close interest in the wounded. I explore royal motives for memorializing rank and file soldiers and their injuries, arguing that the images are shaped by humanitarian and medical interests, as well as royal desire to commemorate survival and bodily resilience. I consider the photographs alongside contemporary reports and prints in newspapers and medical journals depicting the wounded, to give a sense of the cultural significance of the wounded soldier during the Crimean War. By situating Cundall and Howlett’s photographs against the political and emotional conflicts of the war and examining the representation of the individual sufferer, I ask to what extent they participate in, and challenge, wider narratives of healing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Military Studies\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"118 - 139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337486.2019.1631727\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Military Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2019.1631727\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Military Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2019.1631727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exposing wounds: Joseph Cundall and Robert Howlett’s royal assignment
ABSTRACT This article explores Joseph Cundall and Robert Howlett’s little-known photographs of wounded soldiers taken during the Crimean War (1854–1856). These images are an important source in the history of war representation, following Charles Bell’s vivid paintings of gunshot wounds in the wake of the Battle of Waterloo and preceding World War One images of facial mutilation. Commissioned by Queen Victoria during her publicized visits to military hospitals at Chatham and kept for posterity in a royal album entitled ‘Crimean Portraits 1854–6ʹ, Cundall and Howlett’s photographs reveal the monarchy’s close interest in the wounded. I explore royal motives for memorializing rank and file soldiers and their injuries, arguing that the images are shaped by humanitarian and medical interests, as well as royal desire to commemorate survival and bodily resilience. I consider the photographs alongside contemporary reports and prints in newspapers and medical journals depicting the wounded, to give a sense of the cultural significance of the wounded soldier during the Crimean War. By situating Cundall and Howlett’s photographs against the political and emotional conflicts of the war and examining the representation of the individual sufferer, I ask to what extent they participate in, and challenge, wider narratives of healing.
期刊介绍:
Critical Military Studies provides a rigorous, innovative platform for interdisciplinary debate on the operation of military power. It encourages the interrogation and destabilization of often taken-for-granted categories related to the military, militarism and militarization. It especially welcomes original thinking on contradictions and tensions central to the ways in which military institutions and military power work, how such tensions are reproduced within different societies and geopolitical arenas, and within and beyond academic discourse. Contributions on experiences of militarization among groups and individuals, and in hitherto underexplored, perhaps even seemingly ‘non-military’ settings are also encouraged. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to double-blind peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees. The Journal also includes a non-peer reviewed section, Encounters, showcasing multidisciplinary forms of critique such as film and photography, and engaging with policy debates and activism.