{"title":"共归纳数据结构的自动推理技术","authors":"N. Peltier","doi":"10.1093/logcom/exad028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Some techniques are proposed for reasoning on co-inductive structures. First, we devise a sound axiomatization of (conservative extensions) of such structures, thus reducing the problem of checking whether a formula admits a co-inductive model to a first-order satisfiability test. We devise a class of structures, called regularly co-inductive, for which the axiomatization is complete (for other co-inductive structures, the proposed axiomatization is sound, but not complete). Then, we propose proof calculi for reasoning on such structures. We first show that some of the axioms mentioned above can be omitted if the inference rules are able to handle rational terms. Furthermore, under some conditions, some other axioms may be replaced by an additional inference rule that computes the solutions of fixpoint equations. Finally, we show that a stronger completeness result can be established under some additional conditions on the signature.","PeriodicalId":50162,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Logic and Computation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some techniques for reasoning automatically on co-inductive data structures\",\"authors\":\"N. Peltier\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/logcom/exad028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Some techniques are proposed for reasoning on co-inductive structures. First, we devise a sound axiomatization of (conservative extensions) of such structures, thus reducing the problem of checking whether a formula admits a co-inductive model to a first-order satisfiability test. We devise a class of structures, called regularly co-inductive, for which the axiomatization is complete (for other co-inductive structures, the proposed axiomatization is sound, but not complete). Then, we propose proof calculi for reasoning on such structures. We first show that some of the axioms mentioned above can be omitted if the inference rules are able to handle rational terms. Furthermore, under some conditions, some other axioms may be replaced by an additional inference rule that computes the solutions of fixpoint equations. Finally, we show that a stronger completeness result can be established under some additional conditions on the signature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Logic and Computation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Logic and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exad028\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Logic and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exad028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Some techniques for reasoning automatically on co-inductive data structures
Some techniques are proposed for reasoning on co-inductive structures. First, we devise a sound axiomatization of (conservative extensions) of such structures, thus reducing the problem of checking whether a formula admits a co-inductive model to a first-order satisfiability test. We devise a class of structures, called regularly co-inductive, for which the axiomatization is complete (for other co-inductive structures, the proposed axiomatization is sound, but not complete). Then, we propose proof calculi for reasoning on such structures. We first show that some of the axioms mentioned above can be omitted if the inference rules are able to handle rational terms. Furthermore, under some conditions, some other axioms may be replaced by an additional inference rule that computes the solutions of fixpoint equations. Finally, we show that a stronger completeness result can be established under some additional conditions on the signature.
期刊介绍:
Logic has found application in virtually all aspects of Information Technology, from software engineering and hardware to programming and artificial intelligence. Indeed, logic, artificial intelligence and theoretical computing are influencing each other to the extent that a new interdisciplinary area of Logic and Computation is emerging.
The Journal of Logic and Computation aims to promote the growth of logic and computing, including, among others, the following areas of interest: Logical Systems, such as classical and non-classical logic, constructive logic, categorical logic, modal logic, type theory, feasible maths.... Logical issues in logic programming, knowledge-based systems and automated reasoning; logical issues in knowledge representation, such as non-monotonic reasoning and systems of knowledge and belief; logics and semantics of programming; specification and verification of programs and systems; applications of logic in hardware and VLSI, natural language, concurrent computation, planning, and databases. The bulk of the content is technical scientific papers, although letters, reviews, and discussions, as well as relevant conference reviews, are included.