克里代侯爵?关于帝王神性信仰的几点思考

Q2 Arts and Humanities Electrum Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.4467/20800909el.23.012.17329
C. Alarcón Hernández, Fernando Lozano Gómez
{"title":"克里代侯爵?关于帝王神性信仰的几点思考","authors":"C. Alarcón Hernández, Fernando Lozano Gómez","doi":"10.4467/20800909el.23.012.17329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are abundant examples of negative assessments of cultic honors to Roman emperors by nineteenth- and twentieth-century researchers. In the minds of historians raised in modern societies, in which monotheistic Abrahamic religions usually reign supreme, this is a completely understandable a priori approach; nevertheless, it hinders a correct understanding of Roman society in antiquity. This paper examines the need to provide a complex answer to the question of whether the inhabitants of the Roman world really believed in the divinity of their rulers. A complex answer to the question can only emerge from a historical contextualization of the phenomenon under analysis, an examination of the imperial cult within the wider changes that were taking place in Roman religion at the time, and application of the necessary empathetic approach.","PeriodicalId":38045,"journal":{"name":"Electrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hunc deum quis credet? Some Considerations on the Belief in the Divinity of Emperors\",\"authors\":\"C. Alarcón Hernández, Fernando Lozano Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.4467/20800909el.23.012.17329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are abundant examples of negative assessments of cultic honors to Roman emperors by nineteenth- and twentieth-century researchers. In the minds of historians raised in modern societies, in which monotheistic Abrahamic religions usually reign supreme, this is a completely understandable a priori approach; nevertheless, it hinders a correct understanding of Roman society in antiquity. This paper examines the need to provide a complex answer to the question of whether the inhabitants of the Roman world really believed in the divinity of their rulers. A complex answer to the question can only emerge from a historical contextualization of the phenomenon under analysis, an examination of the imperial cult within the wider changes that were taking place in Roman religion at the time, and application of the necessary empathetic approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4467/20800909el.23.012.17329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/20800909el.23.012.17329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

19世纪和20世纪的研究人员对罗马皇帝崇拜荣誉的负面评价有很多例子。在现代社会中成长起来的历史学家心目中,一神论的亚伯拉罕宗教通常是至高无上的,这是一种完全可以理解的先验方法;然而,它阻碍了对古代罗马社会的正确理解。对于罗马世界的居民是否真的相信他们统治者的神性这一问题,本文探讨了提供一个复杂答案的必要性。这个问题的复杂答案只能来自于对所分析现象的历史背景化,在当时罗马宗教发生的更广泛的变化中对帝国崇拜的检查,以及必要的移情方法的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hunc deum quis credet? Some Considerations on the Belief in the Divinity of Emperors
There are abundant examples of negative assessments of cultic honors to Roman emperors by nineteenth- and twentieth-century researchers. In the minds of historians raised in modern societies, in which monotheistic Abrahamic religions usually reign supreme, this is a completely understandable a priori approach; nevertheless, it hinders a correct understanding of Roman society in antiquity. This paper examines the need to provide a complex answer to the question of whether the inhabitants of the Roman world really believed in the divinity of their rulers. A complex answer to the question can only emerge from a historical contextualization of the phenomenon under analysis, an examination of the imperial cult within the wider changes that were taking place in Roman religion at the time, and application of the necessary empathetic approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Electrum
Electrum Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Electrum has been published since 1997 by the Department of Ancient History at the Jagiellonian University in Cracow as a collection of papers and monographs. In 2010 it starts as journal with one monographic issue per year. Journal publishes scholarly papers embodying studies in history and culture of Greece, Rome and Near East from the beginning of the First Millennium BC to about AD 400. Contributions are written in English, German, French and Italian. The journal publishes books reviews.
期刊最新文献
Recruited for the Local Army, despite faraway from their Home: two Cases from the Province of Moesia Superior Mulieres in Military Milieu of Troesmis Edward M. Anson, Ptolemy I Soter: Themes and Issues, Bloomsbury Academic, London–New York 2023, 221 pp. + 5 maps; ISBN 978-1-350-26080-1 Lucia Vison à, La guerre contre l’Autre. Les campagnes parthiques dans l’oeuvre de Plutarque, (Culture antiche. Studi e testi – 36), Edizioni dell’Orso, Alessandria 2023, 144 pp.; ISSN 1824-243X; ISBN 978-88-3613-354-3 Population at Callatis and Odessus: The Roman Soldiers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1