C. Mattos, M. A. Carvalho, J. J. Carvalho, P. Santos, J. Pires, I. Brum
{"title":"超窄径种植体治疗牙槽嵴缩小1例报告","authors":"C. Mattos, M. A. Carvalho, J. J. Carvalho, P. Santos, J. Pires, I. Brum","doi":"10.4236/jbnb.2020.112007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Narrow-diameter implants (3.0 - 3.5 mm range) have been introduced for the replacement of teeth with insufficient bone structure and/or limited mesiodistal or interimplant spaces, and appear to offer clinical results similar to those obtained with implants of greater diameter. Studies using extra-narrow-diameter implants (2.8 mm) are scarce. Case Presentation: A 59-year-old male patient received two extra-narrow-diameter implants, 2.8 × 11 mm in the region between elements 11 and 14. Together, two 3.5 × 8.5 mm SYSTHEX® platform 4.1 implants were installed in the region of elements 15 and 16 to provide greater stability in the occlusion. Of four previous implants on the maxillary left side, one in the region between the elements 23 and 24 that was located in a very apical position and vestibularized was removed. The provisional was already installed on the elements 11, 21, and 22 with the metal cores already prepared and with the Globteck® implants in the region of the elements 23, 24, and 27. The functional and esthetic results were satisfactory. Conclusions: Insertion of extra-narrow-diameter implants of 2.8 mm in the maxillary anterior region is a reliable option in a patient with absence of elements 12 and 13, restoring masticatory function and aesthetics in the upper arch.","PeriodicalId":68623,"journal":{"name":"生物材料与纳米技术(英文)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Extra-Narrow-Diameter Implants in Reduced Alveolar Ridge: A Case Report\",\"authors\":\"C. Mattos, M. A. Carvalho, J. J. Carvalho, P. Santos, J. Pires, I. Brum\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/jbnb.2020.112007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Narrow-diameter implants (3.0 - 3.5 mm range) have been introduced for the replacement of teeth with insufficient bone structure and/or limited mesiodistal or interimplant spaces, and appear to offer clinical results similar to those obtained with implants of greater diameter. Studies using extra-narrow-diameter implants (2.8 mm) are scarce. Case Presentation: A 59-year-old male patient received two extra-narrow-diameter implants, 2.8 × 11 mm in the region between elements 11 and 14. Together, two 3.5 × 8.5 mm SYSTHEX® platform 4.1 implants were installed in the region of elements 15 and 16 to provide greater stability in the occlusion. Of four previous implants on the maxillary left side, one in the region between the elements 23 and 24 that was located in a very apical position and vestibularized was removed. The provisional was already installed on the elements 11, 21, and 22 with the metal cores already prepared and with the Globteck® implants in the region of the elements 23, 24, and 27. The functional and esthetic results were satisfactory. Conclusions: Insertion of extra-narrow-diameter implants of 2.8 mm in the maxillary anterior region is a reliable option in a patient with absence of elements 12 and 13, restoring masticatory function and aesthetics in the upper arch.\",\"PeriodicalId\":68623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"生物材料与纳米技术(英文)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"生物材料与纳米技术(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/jbnb.2020.112007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生物材料与纳米技术(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jbnb.2020.112007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:窄直径种植体(3.0-3.5 mm范围)已被引入用于替换骨结构不足和/或近中或种植间隙有限的牙齿,并且似乎提供了与较大直径种植体相似的临床结果。使用超窄直径植入物(2.8毫米)的研究很少。病例介绍:一名59岁男性患者接受了两个超窄直径植入物,在元件11和14之间的区域为2.8×11 mm。两个3.5×8.5 mm SYSTHEX®平台4.1植入物一起安装在元件15和16的区域,以提供更大的咬合稳定性。在上颌左侧先前的四个植入物中,位于元件23和24之间的区域中的一个位于非常顶端的位置并且前庭化的植入物被移除。临时支架已经安装在元件11、21和22上,金属芯已经准备好,Globtec®植入物位于元件23、24和27的区域。功能和美观效果令人满意。结论:对于没有元件12和13的患者,在上颌前部区域插入2.8 mm的超窄直径植入物是一种可靠的选择,可以恢复上弓的咀嚼功能和美观。
Use of Extra-Narrow-Diameter Implants in Reduced Alveolar Ridge: A Case Report
Background: Narrow-diameter implants (3.0 - 3.5 mm range) have been introduced for the replacement of teeth with insufficient bone structure and/or limited mesiodistal or interimplant spaces, and appear to offer clinical results similar to those obtained with implants of greater diameter. Studies using extra-narrow-diameter implants (2.8 mm) are scarce. Case Presentation: A 59-year-old male patient received two extra-narrow-diameter implants, 2.8 × 11 mm in the region between elements 11 and 14. Together, two 3.5 × 8.5 mm SYSTHEX® platform 4.1 implants were installed in the region of elements 15 and 16 to provide greater stability in the occlusion. Of four previous implants on the maxillary left side, one in the region between the elements 23 and 24 that was located in a very apical position and vestibularized was removed. The provisional was already installed on the elements 11, 21, and 22 with the metal cores already prepared and with the Globteck® implants in the region of the elements 23, 24, and 27. The functional and esthetic results were satisfactory. Conclusions: Insertion of extra-narrow-diameter implants of 2.8 mm in the maxillary anterior region is a reliable option in a patient with absence of elements 12 and 13, restoring masticatory function and aesthetics in the upper arch.