南斯拉夫解体史学研究中的范式与叙事

J. Juhasz
{"title":"南斯拉夫解体史学研究中的范式与叙事","authors":"J. Juhasz","doi":"10.1080/25739638.2022.2164120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article gives an overview on the historiography of the disintegration of Yugoslavia, focusing primarily on Western academic literature. It briefly presents the debates about the wars of the 1990s, summarizing the orientalist/balkanist interpretations, the explanation of the “failed Westernization,” and concepts of Greater-Serbian aggression and Great Power rivalry. The study concludes that all interpretations – except for the extremist branch of the Orientalist paradigm (which focused on the so-called primordial ethnic hatred) and the excesses of national narratives – have, to a varying degree, rational substance. They all make a contribution to the multidisciplinary and multicausal understanding of the disintegration of Yugoslavia in certain aspects. The study further establishes that enough knowledge has been accumulated by now to enable historians to gain – while not a “full and accurate,” but a reliable – picture of what happened. However, greater availability of primary sources as well as a broader comparative approach is still needed.","PeriodicalId":37199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe","volume":"30 1","pages":"405 - 416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paradigms and narratives in the historiography on the disintegration of Yugoslavia\",\"authors\":\"J. Juhasz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25739638.2022.2164120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The article gives an overview on the historiography of the disintegration of Yugoslavia, focusing primarily on Western academic literature. It briefly presents the debates about the wars of the 1990s, summarizing the orientalist/balkanist interpretations, the explanation of the “failed Westernization,” and concepts of Greater-Serbian aggression and Great Power rivalry. The study concludes that all interpretations – except for the extremist branch of the Orientalist paradigm (which focused on the so-called primordial ethnic hatred) and the excesses of national narratives – have, to a varying degree, rational substance. They all make a contribution to the multidisciplinary and multicausal understanding of the disintegration of Yugoslavia in certain aspects. The study further establishes that enough knowledge has been accumulated by now to enable historians to gain – while not a “full and accurate,” but a reliable – picture of what happened. However, greater availability of primary sources as well as a broader comparative approach is still needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"405 - 416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25739638.2022.2164120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25739638.2022.2164120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文以西方学术文献为主要研究对象,对南斯拉夫解体的史学进行了综述。它简要介绍了关于20世纪90年代战争的辩论,总结了东方主义/巴尔干主义的解释,对“失败的西方化”的解释,以及大塞尔维亚侵略和大国竞争的概念。该研究得出结论,除了东方主义范式的极端主义分支(专注于所谓的原始种族仇恨)和民族叙事的过度之外,所有的解释都在不同程度上具有理性实质。它们都有助于多学科和多配偶在某些方面理解南斯拉夫的解体。这项研究进一步证实,到目前为止,已经积累了足够的知识,使历史学家能够了解所发生的事情,虽然不是“全面准确”,但却是可靠的。然而,仍然需要更多的初级来源以及更广泛的比较方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Paradigms and narratives in the historiography on the disintegration of Yugoslavia
ABSTRACT The article gives an overview on the historiography of the disintegration of Yugoslavia, focusing primarily on Western academic literature. It briefly presents the debates about the wars of the 1990s, summarizing the orientalist/balkanist interpretations, the explanation of the “failed Westernization,” and concepts of Greater-Serbian aggression and Great Power rivalry. The study concludes that all interpretations – except for the extremist branch of the Orientalist paradigm (which focused on the so-called primordial ethnic hatred) and the excesses of national narratives – have, to a varying degree, rational substance. They all make a contribution to the multidisciplinary and multicausal understanding of the disintegration of Yugoslavia in certain aspects. The study further establishes that enough knowledge has been accumulated by now to enable historians to gain – while not a “full and accurate,” but a reliable – picture of what happened. However, greater availability of primary sources as well as a broader comparative approach is still needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Post-1989 women’s struggle between career growth and everyday duties CEEC stock markets in the post-communist era: evolutions and convergences “The revolution born out of a swear”: populist humour, carnivalization, and mass protest in Romania “East, East, East Germany!” The (other) reunification of football fan culture and the roots of an east german exceptionalism Legal, illegal, either way informal: examining continuities of small-scale entrepreneurship between late socialism and postsocialism in Czechia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1