联盟的军队:巴西进步联盟的非国家行动者

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Latin Americanist Pub Date : 2021-12-10 DOI:10.1353/tla.2021.0031
Graydon Dennison
{"title":"联盟的军队:巴西进步联盟的非国家行动者","authors":"Graydon Dennison","doi":"10.1353/tla.2021.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to expose how US non-state actors played a critical role in the implementation of the Alliance for Progress in Brazil. By mid-1962, President Kennedy's idealism waned in the face of João Goulart's recalcitrance. The Brazilian president saw US aid for what it was – intervention – and encouraged his supporters to resist Alliance measures at all costs. To help mitigate this resistance and grow support for the program at home, the Kennedy administration called on the wider American public. The public answered the call. Three groups stand out in their involvement with the Alliance for Progress in Brazil – American labor unions, the Catholic Church, and universities affiliated with the newly created Partners of the Alliance program. These non-state actors worked with the State Department's Agency for International Development to steer sectors of Brazilian society away from Communist influence and into the orbit of US foreign aid policy. In so doing, these public actors became the \"chosen instrument\" of the US government in their mission to politically reorient Brazil. Unfortunately, for Brazil, groups of US citizens became vectors for right-wing politics that aided the rise of the Castello Branco military regime. For the Alliance was officially a state-to-state program, scholars tend to overlook the role of non-state actors in its history. By weaving labor unions, the Catholic Church, and American universities into the narrative, the US public's active involvement becomes clearer than ever.","PeriodicalId":42355,"journal":{"name":"Latin Americanist","volume":"65 1","pages":"460 - 480"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Army of the Alliance: Non-State Actors of the Alliance for Progress in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Graydon Dennison\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tla.2021.0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to expose how US non-state actors played a critical role in the implementation of the Alliance for Progress in Brazil. By mid-1962, President Kennedy's idealism waned in the face of João Goulart's recalcitrance. The Brazilian president saw US aid for what it was – intervention – and encouraged his supporters to resist Alliance measures at all costs. To help mitigate this resistance and grow support for the program at home, the Kennedy administration called on the wider American public. The public answered the call. Three groups stand out in their involvement with the Alliance for Progress in Brazil – American labor unions, the Catholic Church, and universities affiliated with the newly created Partners of the Alliance program. These non-state actors worked with the State Department's Agency for International Development to steer sectors of Brazilian society away from Communist influence and into the orbit of US foreign aid policy. In so doing, these public actors became the \\\"chosen instrument\\\" of the US government in their mission to politically reorient Brazil. Unfortunately, for Brazil, groups of US citizens became vectors for right-wing politics that aided the rise of the Castello Branco military regime. For the Alliance was officially a state-to-state program, scholars tend to overlook the role of non-state actors in its history. By weaving labor unions, the Catholic Church, and American universities into the narrative, the US public's active involvement becomes clearer than ever.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin Americanist\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"460 - 480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin Americanist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tla.2021.0031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin Americanist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tla.2021.0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文旨在揭示美国非国家行为体如何在巴西实施“进步联盟”中发挥关键作用。到1962年年中,肯尼迪总统的理想主义在约翰·奥·古拉特的反抗下逐渐消退。巴西总统看到了美国援助的本质——干预——并鼓励他的支持者不惜一切代价抵制联盟的措施。为了减轻这种阻力,增加国内对该计划的支持,肯尼迪政府呼吁更广泛的美国公众。公众响应了号召。在参与巴西进步联盟的过程中,有三个团体脱颖而出——美国工会、天主教会和隶属于新成立的联盟伙伴项目的大学。这些非国家行为体与美国国务院国际开发署(Agency for International Development)合作,引导巴西社会的各个部门远离共产主义的影响,进入美国对外援助政策的轨道。在这样做的过程中,这些公共行为者成为美国政府在政治上重新定位巴西的使命中“选择的工具”。不幸的是,对巴西来说,美国公民群体成为右翼政治的载体,帮助了卡斯特罗·布兰科(Castello Branco)军事政权的崛起。由于该联盟在官方上是一个国家对国家的项目,学者们往往忽视了非国家行为体在其历史上的作用。通过将工会、天主教会和美国大学纳入叙事,美国公众的积极参与变得比以往任何时候都更加清晰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Army of the Alliance: Non-State Actors of the Alliance for Progress in Brazil
Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to expose how US non-state actors played a critical role in the implementation of the Alliance for Progress in Brazil. By mid-1962, President Kennedy's idealism waned in the face of João Goulart's recalcitrance. The Brazilian president saw US aid for what it was – intervention – and encouraged his supporters to resist Alliance measures at all costs. To help mitigate this resistance and grow support for the program at home, the Kennedy administration called on the wider American public. The public answered the call. Three groups stand out in their involvement with the Alliance for Progress in Brazil – American labor unions, the Catholic Church, and universities affiliated with the newly created Partners of the Alliance program. These non-state actors worked with the State Department's Agency for International Development to steer sectors of Brazilian society away from Communist influence and into the orbit of US foreign aid policy. In so doing, these public actors became the "chosen instrument" of the US government in their mission to politically reorient Brazil. Unfortunately, for Brazil, groups of US citizens became vectors for right-wing politics that aided the rise of the Castello Branco military regime. For the Alliance was officially a state-to-state program, scholars tend to overlook the role of non-state actors in its history. By weaving labor unions, the Catholic Church, and American universities into the narrative, the US public's active involvement becomes clearer than ever.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Latin Americanist
Latin Americanist HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Jorge Luis Borges’s Gauchesca and the Issue of Genre Death Keep the Bones Alive: Missing People and the Search for Life in Brazil by Graham Denyer Willis (review) “Our Hemisphere”? The United States in Latin America, from 1776 to the Twenty-First Century by Britta H. Crandall and Russell C. Crandall (review) Communicating Coffee: Owners and Workers’ Role and Experiences during the Rise of Specialty Cafés in Two Mexican Cities, 2010–20 Brazilian Politics on Trial: Corruption & Reform under Democracy by Luciano Da Ros and Matthew M. Taylor (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1